Hi Jody,
Upon a little further investigation I don't think I need to do anything
with the casting functions. I think all that needs to be done is to add
a check so that no casting is done if both objects are Numbers.
So for my case if I add
if (v1 instanceof Number && v2 instanceof Number)
I'm creating Quantile breaks in uDig on a shapefile with five features
numbered 1-5. Since I'm asking for 5 "bins" I'm getting one item in
each bin. The Quantile Function creates the following RangedClassifier:
1 - 1
2 - 2
3 - 3
4 - 4
5 - 5
Which would be okay except the SLD generated from suc
Voting is open to all developers :) So your +1 is welcome.
As for my vote, i am +1 on H2. But agree with Andrea that we should not
rule out a JavaDB version, what is one of the benefits of the
referencing plugin system. But if we have resources backing H2, then
let's go with H2.
andrea antonel
wfs 1.0 client sets feature type url to dft location
Key: GEOT-2544
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2544
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Bug
Components: data wfs
Affe
Simone Giannecchini ha scritto:
> Besides what I wrote in the other email, I have been looking at
> referenced envelope as an implementation of bbox, because that' what
> really is. It also implements envelope for interoperability, but it is
> 2D only.
> Right now we are talking about changing the
---
Ing. Simone Giannecchini
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Owner - Software Engineer
Via Carignoni 51
55041 Camaiore (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584983027
fax: +39 0584983027
mob:+39 333 8128928
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://simboss.blogspot.co
Hi,
as anticipated in the proposal I'm working on keeping the
coordinate dimension information inside the GeometryDescriptor
hint. However, I'm having a question and facing a difficulty.
Tthe descriptor user map is mutable. Is this expected?
I find somewhat strange, and would allow code to make th
Simone Giannecchini ha scritto:
>> The main reason to have a 3d envelope class is to be able
>> and return the 3d envelope of 3d data sets as well.
>> As an alternative I guess I could sublcass ReferencedEnvelope,
>> but that would create even more confusion...
>
>
> It would probably make sense
---
Ing. Simone Giannecchini
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Owner - Software Engineer
Via Carignoni 51
55041 Camaiore (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584983027
fax: +39 0584983027
mob:+39 333 8128928
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://simboss.blogspot.co
Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto:
> Andrea Aime wrote:
>> Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto:
>>> In 2D+1, is the main difference that the third dimension ignored by
>>> some operations, such as coordinate transforms? I suspect 2D+1 will
>>> be OK for line-strings, except when you try to change datum.
>>
Another fact about Derby.
Derby is fully DB2 compatible (sql and jdbc) and you can switch easily to a
"DB2 Community Edition" which is the full powered db2 product without
clustering.
But I dont want to produce additional work and this is not an extremly
important question, so I will leave th
Hi, aware of the fact that I can't vote, I will anyway give my comment
(in case of an even, this might count as a 0.0001) :)
+1 for H2 for obvious JGrass reasons and because the indexes seems to
be not too far
+1 for spatialite whenever it will come
Ciao,
Andrea
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 10:18 AM
Hi,
so it seems we might need to reach an agreement on the embedded db to use.
H2 pros:
- frequent releases
- fast
- already used in GeoWebCache, GeoServer and JGrass
- already used in GeoTools modules
- can probably use the EPSG sql dumps directly (it
has sql compatibility modes for mysql, ora
Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto:
> Andrea Aime wrote:
>> Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto:
>>> Consulting with a knowledgeable stakeholder yielded these examples of
>>> interesting 3D geospatial data:
>>> - 3-D line-string (wells and boreholes, atmospheric and ocean soundings)
>> This is 2d+1, will be
Andrea Aime wrote:
> Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto:
>> Consulting with a knowledgeable stakeholder yielded these examples of
>> interesting 3D geospatial data:
>> - 3-D line-string (wells and boreholes, atmospheric and ocean soundings)
> This is 2d+1, will be handled by the proposal
>> - TIN (geol
Leandro wrote:
> No puedo descargar el archivo de configuración
> http://docs.geoserver.org/1.7.x/developer/config
> I can not download the configuration file
> http://docs.geoserver.org/1.7.x/developer/config
I think the svn config should be in svn. Both GT and GS can use the same
one. I would p
16 matches
Mail list logo
