Re: [Geotools-devel] EPSG factories: H2 vs JavaDB

2009-06-11 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Andrea Aime wrote: > so it seems we might need to reach an agreement on the embedded db to use. I am +0 on H2 and -0 on JavaDB/Derby, on the basis of the devil we know, and to reduce duplication. I am not all that happy with H2. My attempts to fix a nasty EPSG empty-/tmp fail-once unit test (se

Re: [Geotools-devel] EPSG factories: H2 vs JavaDB

2009-06-11 Thread Andrea Aime
Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto: > Andrea Aime wrote: >> so it seems we might need to reach an agreement on the embedded db to >> use. > > I am +0 on H2 and -0 on JavaDB/Derby, on the basis of the devil we know, > and to reduce duplication. > > I am not all that happy with H2. My attempts to fix

Re: [Geotools-devel] EPSG factories: H2 vs JavaDB

2009-06-11 Thread Michael Bedward
2009/6/11 Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > What does geotoolkit use? [*runs and hides*] > Dear me, you are a stirrer sometimes :-) +1 for H2 (I've no problems with it being a solo effort at present) +0 for JavaDB at some stage if demand and resources are there Michael --

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: partial 3d data handling

2009-06-11 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Andrea Aime wrote: > Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto: >> In 2D+1, is the main difference that the third dimension ignored by some >> operations, such as coordinate transforms? I suspect 2D+1 will be OK for >> line-strings, except when you try to change datum. > > Indeed. However there is no guaran

[Geotools-devel] Partial 3d support patch ready for review

2009-06-11 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi all, if anybody wants to review or try out partial 3d support I've attached a 2.5.x patch at http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2537 With that one I managed to create nice 3D KML outputs from polygons and lines in GeoServer (GML generated is still 2D, I guess we might want to unlock the 3d na

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: partial 3d data handling

2009-06-11 Thread Simone Giannecchini
Ciao Andrea, please, see below... --- Ing. Simone Giannecchini GeoSolutions S.A.S. Owner - Software Engineer Via Carignoni 51 55041 Camaiore (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584983027 fax: +39 0584983027 mob:+39 333 8128928 http://www.geo-solut

[Geotools-devel] Does anybody mind if I remove the Refractions repo ref. from 2.5.x?

2009-06-11 Thread Andrea Aime
As the subject says, I would like to remove that reference. The builds on 2.5.x have been stuck all the day due to the repo being down (maven waits for a looong timeout, much longer than my scarce patience). Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from t

Re: [Geotools-devel] Does anybody mind if I remove the Refractions repo ref. from 2.5.x?

2009-06-11 Thread Justin Deoliveira
I just did so locally so +1. I believe the opengeo repo should cover all that the refractions repo does. -Justin Andrea Aime wrote: > As the subject says, > I would like to remove that reference. The builds on 2.5.x have been > stuck all the day due to the repo being down (maven waits for a looo

Re: [Geotools-devel] Does anybody mind if I remove the Refractions repo ref. from 2.5.x?

2009-06-11 Thread Christian Müller
Oh ys, sometimes I was wondering why the builds last so long but did not dig deeper. +1 Andrea Aime writes: > As the subject says, > I would like to remove that reference. The builds on 2.5.x have been > stuck all the day due to the repo being down (maven waits for a looong > timeout, much

Re: [Geotools-devel] Does anybody mind if I remove the Refractions repo ref. from 2.5.x?

2009-06-11 Thread Simone Giannecchini
+1 --- Ing. Simone Giannecchini GeoSolutions S.A.S. Owner - Software Engineer Via Carignoni 51 55041 Camaiore (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584983027 fax: +39 0584983027 mob:+39 333 8128928 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://simboss.blogspot

[Geotools-devel] default geometries of simple features

2009-06-11 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Some changes to the implementation of SimpleFeature.getDefaultGeometry() are causing some problems with geoserver cite tests. The changes in question are described here: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2403 As stated in the issue, the method before the changes was inconsistent with the co

Re: [Geotools-devel] default geometries of simple features

2009-06-11 Thread Gabriel Roldan
Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Some changes to the implementation of SimpleFeature.getDefaultGeometry() > are causing some problems with geoserver cite tests. The changes in > question are described here: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2403 > > As stated in the issue, the method before th

Re: [Geotools-devel] Does anybody mind if I remove the Refractions repo ref. from 2.5.x?

2009-06-11 Thread Ian Turton
+1 Ian -- Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deplo

Re: [Geotools-devel] [ExternalEmail] Re: [Geoserver-devel] config de svn

2009-06-11 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Leandro wrote: >> No puedo descargar el archivo de configuración >> http://docs.geoserver.org/1.7.x/developer/config >> I can not download the configuration file >> http://docs.geoserver.org/1.7.x/developer/config > > I think the svn config should be in svn. Both GT and

[Geotools-devel] Proposal: svn externals in new svn 1.5 format in the GeoTools repo?

2009-06-11 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
I want to add a relative svn external in the new format introduced in svn 1.5, which permits relative paths. This is a great improvement for maintenance because it removes host names and makes internal externals (I am turning into Rumsfeld) robust against branching. This *will* cause those usin

Re: [Geotools-devel] Does anybody mind if I remove the Refractions repo ref. from 2.5.x?

2009-06-11 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
+1, please do. I recently had the misfortune of building 2.4.x, and a dead repo for Jetty made it an agony. Anyone who culls dead or broken repos has my thanks. Andrea Aime wrote: > As the subject says, > I would like to remove that reference. The builds on 2.5.x have been > stuck all the day du

Re: [Geotools-devel] Does anybody mind if I remove the Refractions repo ref. from 2.5.x?

2009-06-11 Thread Michael Bedward
+1 and thanks Andrea Michael -- Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing

Re: [Geotools-devel] EPSG factories: H2 vs JavaDB

2009-06-11 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Andrea Aime wrote: > Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto: >> I am not all that happy with H2. My attempts to fix a nasty EPSG [.. rambling anecdote ...] > You mean HSQL here? We're not using H2 for EPSG factories at the moment. You are quite right. I must get more sleep. While H2 and HSQL share a devel

Re: [Geotools-devel] EPSG factories: H2 vs JavaDB

2009-06-11 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Michael Bedward wrote: > 2009/6/11 Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: >> What does geotoolkit use? [*runs and hides*] > Dear me, you are a stirrer sometimes :-) It's a talent. But seriously, I hope one day we will reunite with the Lost Tribe of GeoTools. -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineer, CSIRO

Re: [Geotools-devel] [ExternalEmail] Re: EPSG factories: H2 vs JavaDB

2009-06-11 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: >>> What does geotoolkit use? [*runs and hides*] >> JavaDB (the one that comes along with the JDK). > > Hmm, that is one reason to use it. How easy is to switch from JavaDB to Derby? Or has JavaDB undergone the usual copy-to-prevent-bugfixes approach usually employed by

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: svn externals in new svn 1.5 format in the GeoTools repo?

2009-06-11 Thread Andrea Aime
Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto: > I want to add a relative svn external in the new format introduced in > svn 1.5, which permits relative paths. This is a great improvement for > maintenance because it removes host names and makes internal externals > (I am turning into Rumsfeld) robust against b