Hi Andrea,
I just tried applying your patch to trunk which contains some of my
recent additions.
All went well with patching, build and tests :-)
cheers
Michael
--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal
Hi,
I've been experimenting a little with connection pools performance
and it seems the C3P0 connection pool
(http://sourceforge.net/projects/c3p0/)
is designed for slightly better scalability than the DBCP one we're
using today.
In particular in a WMS request benchmark, and when reaching the h
I think that all deployments in a J2EE container should use the connection
pooling of the chosen container.
I do not see the importance of a change but perhaps I have overseen
something. ?
Andrea Aime writes:
> Hi,
> I've been experimenting a little with connection pools performance
> and i
My 2 cents,
DBCP is not usually recommended in the JEE environments where I have
worked (mainly JBOSS) while c3p0 is usually highly recommended.
Simone.
---
Ing. Simone Giannecchini
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Owner - Software Engineer
Via Carignoni 51
5
Christian Müller ha scritto:
> I think that all deployments in a J2EE container should use the
> connection pooling of the chosen container.
> I do not see the importance of a change but perhaps I have overseen
> something. ?
Simple: setting up a JNDI connection pool is _hard_ for most of the
pe
PostgisNG and Oracle NG are using access by name instead of positional access
--
Key: GEOT-2635
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2635
Project: GeoTools
Iss
Ciao Simone,
I've provided the background info and a link to sample data as required by
your comment on the jira. When you have a chance please take a look at it.
I'd be greate if I get the go ahead to commit the patch before the
upcoming 2.5.7 release, or to work out any inconvenient with i
Gabriel Roldan ha scritto:
> Ciao Simone,
>
> I've provided the background info and a link to sample data as required
> by your comment on the jira. When you have a chance please take a look
> at it. I'd be greate if I get the go ahead to commit the patch before
> the upcoming 2.5.7 release, or
Andrea Aime wrote:
> Simple: setting up a JNDI connection pool is _hard_ for most of the
> people (go ask Ben how much time he wasted setting it up, and
> I can tell you I cursed Tomcat for a good two hours before I got my
> JNDI pool working).
This is a documentation issue. Decent examples, such
Christian Müller wrote:
> I think that all deployments in a J2EE container should use the connection
> pooling of the chosen container.
Christian, as reminded me, GeoTools datastores may be used without a
J2EE container. I think this is what Andrea is proposing: a change to
the connection pool
Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto:
> Andrea Aime wrote:
>> Simple: setting up a JNDI connection pool is _hard_ for most of the
>> people (go ask Ben how much time he wasted setting it up, and
>> I can tell you I cursed Tomcat for a good two hours before I got my
>> JNDI pool working).
>
> This is a do
Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto:
> Christian Müller wrote:
>> I think that all deployments in a J2EE container should use the
>> connection pooling of the chosen container.
>
> Christian, as reminded me, GeoTools datastores may be used without a
> J2EE container. I think this is what Andrea is pr
app-schema does not recognise substitution groups of abstract types
---
Key: GEOT-2636
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2636
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Bug
13 matches
Mail list logo
