Not sure Florence:
Are you thinking of working against the an AnyBinding or something? What is it
that you are looking for?
Jody
On 10/05/2010, at 2:45 PM,
wrote:
> Hi Jody,
>
> I'm currently working on "Complex features support for any attribute"
> (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-
please, discard the previous patch.
Simone.
---
Ing. Simone Giannecchini
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Founder - Software Engineer
Via Carignoni 51
55041 Camaiore (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584983027
fax: +39 0584983027
mob:+39 333 8128928
http:/
Ciao Michael,
I have spent some time meesing up the WritableGridCoverage2D class you
have put together, I am attaching a small patch for trunk.
Here is some sparse thoughts on it:
- Think about how to avoid creation of a large number of {...@link
DirectPosition2D} and {...@link GridCoordinates2D
Nope this is something that is in the planning stage; welcome to planning
please enjoy your stay :-)
So Michael I think we need a bit more information:
- what are the restrictions on publishing to the maven central or sonyatype?
- we can marshal our unsupported modules into different piles depend
Hi Simone,
I confess that it had fallen out the back of my head until I saw Ben's
reply to Jody about the problem of some unsupported modules not
meeting Maven Central criteria.
I guess the most useful thing to do is for me to draft a proposal.
Michael
On 10 May 2010 15:13, Simone Giannecchini
I'm more than happy to do the sphinx editing rather than burden Martin
(or other contributors) from having to come to grips with it. I think
we'll get more help from folks that way :-)
Michael
On 10 May 2010 15:33, Simone Giannecchini
wrote:
> Sphinx is what we (should) use for writing document
On 10 May 2010 15:35, Simone Giannecchini wrote:
> Well, if you have something in mind, we could reach some consensus on
> the ml and then factor out a proposal.
Ah... I did a quick draft before seeing your reply:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Split+up+unsupported+modules
It's not mor
Well, if you have something in mind, we could reach some consensus on
the ml and then factor out a proposal.
I would happy to help as I can to reduce the monster size of
unsupported modules.
Simone.
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 7:31 AM, Michael Bedward
wrote:
> Hi Simone,
>
> I confess that it had fa
Sphinx is what we (should) use for writing documentation.
Please, check these links:
http://docs.geoserver.org/trunk/en/docguide/install.html
http://docs.geoserver.org/trunk/en/docguide/sphinx.html
Simone.
---
Ing. Simone Giannecchini
GeoSolutio
Ciao Michaek,
do you have a plan for this?
Simone.
---
Ing. Simone Giannecchini
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Founder - Software Engineer
Via Carignoni 51
55041 Camaiore (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584983027
fax: +39 0584983027
mob:+39 333 8128928
Hi Jody,
I'm currently working on "Complex features support for any attribute"
(http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3065) issue. But while stepping thru the
code, found that there's no "any" element in the schema which I can work on.
Thus would like to seek some help and find out from you ho
Hi Andrea
> Played with it, looks fine, managed to break it in a couple of ways:
> - by removing the interpolation parameter in the function definition you get
> an NPE
Just added a couple of unit tests: one for mode but no method
parameter; one for method but no mode. Both pass so I must be
mis
Hi all,
Just bumping this discussion from March about splitting up
unsupported, following Ben's comment about issues with these modules
and the idea of publishing GeoTools to Maven Central.
Michael
On 24 March 2010 10:31, Michael Bedward wrote:
> New new list...
>
> Incubator (active developmen
Hi Jody,
> So where do we store the website?
> - http://svn.osgeo.org/geotools/web/ (is a suggestion)
> - http://svn.osgeo.org/geotools/trunk/website <-- and have it link to
> seperatly produced & published docs for 1.7 and 1.6?
I've often got more than one version of trunk on my local machine
On 09/05/2010, at 7:38 PM, Michael Bedward wrote:
> I guess the wiki is dead in terms of being a user-supported resource,
> but it's very much alive in terms of there being a huge amount of
> material there that can be re-used. So much easier than starting from
> scratch ! And although there has
Hi Jody,
Thanks for this. I'm with you on making the docs more formally part
of the code base (ie. out of 'spike') and continuing to move things
into sphinx docs with live code links.
I guess the wiki is dead in terms of being a user-supported resource,
but it's very much alive in terms of there
On 9 May 2010 18:48, Martin Tomko wrote:
>
> No idea what sphinx is, honestly ;) so I just will send this to Michael cc
> simone, if that's ok.
>
More than ok Martin... That would be terrific :)
Michael
--
_
17 matches
Mail list logo
