[Geotools-devel] build/eclipse/codetemplates.xml empty

2011-01-05 Thread v...@csiro
I noticed that the codetemplates look empty or at least when I tried setting the codetemplate in eclipse, it is not showing the header. Am I missing something? -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/build-eclipse-codetemplates-xml-empty-tp5894624p5894624.html Sen

[Geotools-devel] gt-api

2011-01-05 Thread Jody Garnett
The module gt-opengis was added successfully. On 05/01/2011, at 3:31 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > * +0 on a new opengis module. I personally would rather see them in the > geotools api module in favor of adding yet another "infrastructure" module. I had a look at what in gt-api breaks; if it

Re: [Geotools-devel] namespaces part 2

2011-01-05 Thread Jody Garnett
Let me review the proposal ... http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/XPath+NamespaceSupport A couple of things - If you compare with http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Refactor+OpenGIS you can see that it has a JIRA bug mentioned near the top. We use that to make sure the proposal i

Re: [Geotools-devel] proposal

2011-01-05 Thread Jody Garnett
I have updated the proposal with notes reflecting Justin's questions: - http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Refactor+OpenGIS Please review and vote accordingly; I think I have enough votes to proceed currently. I am going to rename to "gt-opengis" now; and will try and look closely at why

Re: [Geotools-devel] Building (non simple) feature types and features

2011-01-05 Thread Jody Garnett
On 04/01/2011, at 5:49 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 1:28 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: >> You are correct; we were waiting on someone to actually need the >> functionality as they would be bin a better position to create a factory and >> builder. > > Yeah, I was hoping that peopl

Re: [Geotools-devel] proposal

2011-01-05 Thread Jody Garnett
Thanks Justin; that is what I needed (I have the commit ready but it was waiting a few +1 votes). The code is considered stable; no api change as the proposal states. I could not use the gt-api module as it depends on metadata; coverage and others. We may be able to refactor once we have all the