Jody Garnett created GEOT-4124:
--
Summary: NADCONTransform producing warnings when running tests
Key: GEOT-4124
URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-4124
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Wish
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 1:21 AM, Martin Davis mda...@opengeo.org wrote:
Ok, taking care of this inside GeometryCoordinateSequenceTransformer seems
to work in (very) limited testing. I'll open up a ticket for this and
attach the patch - then await word on how best to test (and others can
pitch
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 2:38 AM, Jody Garnett jody.garn...@gmail.com wrote:
Q: Is the OGC changing all existing schemas in a backwards incompatible
way going to get in the way of a release candidate at this time?
+1 on the release candidate, and no, I don't believe we should bend over
Hi,
talking with Chris last week we were discussing the general lack of
coordination
that has been affecting both GeoTools and GeoServer in the last year or so.
It would be nice to try and open a bit communications channels with a means
that gives more opportunity for people to talk about what
A big +1 here. A few thoughts.
I agree voice is more productive but has a few potential drawbacks. Harder
to get a transcript for one. Also some non-native english speakers may
prefer the IRC medium rather than voice, but I will let others comment on
that.
I think the two week recurrence is a
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Andrea Aime andrea.a...@geo-solutions.itwrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 2:38 AM, Jody Garnett jody.garn...@gmail.comwrote:
Q: Is the OGC changing all existing schemas in a backwards incompatible
way going to get in the way of a release candidate at this time?
In general I think it looks great, a few things though. I think given the
current effort to put out releases 1 month is probably asking a bit much
given the resources we have on the project. So I think to do one month
cycles we really do need to better automate our release process with a
hudson
Makes sense. I'll work up a unit test for
GeometryCoordinateSequenceTransformer, and then I'll be working on a test
at the WFS level (since the main goal is to get Z ordinates coming through
WFS).
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 6:00 AM, Andrea Aime andrea.a...@geo-solutions.itwrote:
On Tue, May 1,
Hey Jody,
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Jody Garnett jody.garn...@gmail.comwrote:
Timely email Jody, I meant to send a similar one.
One benefit of waking up before you.
As GeoServer moves closer to 2.2 we want to have an official geotools 8
release to work with.
Yep; with that in
We can try it; I just went through the timezone dance let week for a GSoC
timeslot and ended up with:
-
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?iso=20120514p1=47p2=215p3=179p4=55
With that in mind this slot looked best:
- Monday, 14 May 2012 at 13:00:00
The main help I need from you is checking the documentation landing page
for the different JDBC datastores; the bar remains a single code example.
I just took a run through of the jdbc pages and tweaked the docs. Some of the
literalincludes were pointing to the wrong classes, etc...
Il giorno 01/mag/2012 23:44, Jody Garnett jody.garn...@gmail.com ha
scritto:
We can try it; I just went through the timezone dance let week for a GSoC
timeslot and ended up with:
-
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?iso=20120514p1=47p2=215p3=179p4=55
With that in mind
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Jody Garnett jody.garn...@gmail.com wrote:
The main help I need from you is checking the documentation landing page
for the different JDBC datastores; the bar remains a single code example.
I just took a run through of the jdbc pages and tweaked the docs. Some
Ciao Justin,
I would rather go for voice, as my experience with IRC was not very good.
We are happy to host the meetings with our webex account so that we
can register them and try to make them available afterwards, putting
them somewhere on one of our demo servers.
Baseline rationale behind
Nice so call it GeoTools Tribe open mike :-)
Bring your coffee or beer as appropriate to your timezone; and lets try and get
some releases out again.
--
Jody Garnett
Baseline rationale behind resurrecting the meetings was to have an
agile way to try and coordinate lightly not to add
I do like text records. I think one thing that could work well would
be to etherpad it, so a few people can take relevant notes at once.
Then we can post that etherpad transcript to the blog when we're done.
I'd be happy to try to take lead on writing, as long as there'd be a
couple backups for
On 02/05/12 05:44, Jody Garnett wrote:
With that in mind this slot looked best:
- Monday, 14 May 2012 at
13:00:00http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2012month=5day=14hour=13min=0sec=0p1=47p2=215p3=179
- Rome 3pm
- New York 9am
- Calgary 7am
- Brisbane 11 pm
I
17 matches
Mail list logo
