Re: [Geotools-devel] Out-of-date subversion config in user manual

> Good thinking. With enough ../../ it should work. One problem might be > builds that checkout only the docs subtree; I checked the > geotools-trunk-docs Hudson and it checks out the top level so should > work fine. > > That is not an issue; many of the "live" code examples use /../../mod

Re: [Geotools-devel] Out-of-date subversion config in user manual

Good thinking. With enough ../../ it should work. One problem might be builds that checkout only the docs subtree; I checked the geotools-trunk-docs Hudson and it checks out the top level so should work fine. On 22/05/12 12:33, Jody Garnett wrote: > Can you just fix the source RST? You should b

Re: [Geotools-devel] Out-of-date subversion config in user manual

Can you just fix the source RST? You should be able to pull the original as a relative path right into the docs. -- Jody Garnett On Tuesday, 22 May 2012 at 12:06 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Jody, > > Rini spotted that the subversion config attached to the user guide > instructions is a

Re: [Geotools-devel] extensive / interactive tests build broken in gt-swing module

Interesting. Nevermind... i take it back, the module builds now :) I think I see what is happening. The FEST stuff seems to take control over the mouse and if you try to mess with it that is what seems to lead to failures. If i build the module and don't try to do anything else with my computer it

Re: [Geotools-devel] Schema support for kml 2.0 and 2.2, General geotools catalog Service support

Hey Frank, On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Frank Gasdorf wrote: > Thanks Justin, > > this is a good point to start! I've done something similar but was nut > sure about the xmlcodgen configurations. The main difference > was the property "destinationPackage" 've set to > org.geotools.kml.v2_2.b

Re: [Geotools-devel] Online tests before release?

That would be excellent! Given the amount of effort invested by you and other core developers in online jdbc unit tests, it would be great to run them more often, for both kinds of database, postgres *and* oracle: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cSZfUnCK5qk I could not get even Oracle XE to insta

Re: [Geotools-devel] Online tests before release?

Yes, ideally we would run the jdbc tests continuously or even nightly but unfortunately this is not that simple as it requires database infrastructure to be setup. Straight forward in the postgresql case, not so straight forward in the oracle case. It is on my sort of long term todo list to get th

[Geotools-devel] Out-of-date subversion config in user manual

Jody, Rini spotted that the subversion config attached to the user guide instructions is an old version: http://docs.geotools.org/latest/userguide/_downloads/config The link is on this page: http://docs.geotools.org/latest/userguide/advanced/build/install/svn.html In particular, the attached con

[Geotools-devel] Online tests before release?

Should we be running online tests, such as those for jdbc plugins, before cutting a release? I don't see Hudson coverage. I still see local failures like this: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-4046 -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineer CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Austra

Re: [Geotools-devel] extensive / interactive tests build broken in gt-swing module

Those are different to the tests that were failing for Jody and, once again, they are all passing for my system. It could be that the FEST / Swing testing approach is not robust across platforms which, if true, more or less sinks any hope of having enough test coverage to move gt-swing out of unsup

Re: [Geotools-devel] 8.0-RC1 deployed to maven

Okay with that I will tag and bag geotools then. On 22/05/2012, at 3:42 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Awesome, but unfortunately cite tests are in a sort of sad state right now > for geoserver 2.2.x and we won't be mandating that we pass them for > 2.2-beta2. > > I wil push out the geose

Re: [Geotools-devel] Schema support for kml 2.0 and 2.2, General geotools catalog Service support

Thanks Justin, this is a good point to start! I've done something similar but was nut sure about the xmlcodgen configurations. The main difference was the property "destinationPackage" 've set to org.geotools.kml.v2_2.bindings But it seems to me, that (most) of the bindings are identical over th

[Geotools-devel] [Hudson] Hudson build is back to normal : geotools-2.7.x-docs #312

See -- This message is automatically generated by Hudson. For more information on Hudson, see: http://hudson-ci.org/ -- Live Security Virtual Conference Ex

Re: [Geotools-devel] 8.0-RC1 deployed to maven

Awesome, but unfortunately cite tests are in a sort of sad state right now for geoserver 2.2.x and we won't be mandating that we pass them for 2.2-beta2. I wil push out the geoserver release later today. Thanks Jody. On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > Morning Justin: > > I h

Re: [Geotools-devel] Schema support for kml 2.0 and 2.2, General geotools catalog Service support

Hey Frank, I actually started this work a while back on a github branch. It would be great if you could resurrect it! https://github.com/jdeolive/geotools/tree/kml -Justin On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Frank Gasdorf wrote: > Hello List, > > in the new uDig plugin for kml/kmz support we ar

Re: [Geotools-devel] extensive / interactive tests build broken in gt-swing module

Yeah, I also see failures in this module. Results : Failed tests: dragPanMap(org.geotools.swing.tool.PanToolTest) clickZoomAtCentreOfMap(org.geotools.swing.tool.ZoomOutToolTest) labelTextIsFittedProperly(org.geotools.swing.dialog.DialogUtilsTest) Tests in error: filterByCode(org.geotools

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] starting 3D work

Hello Niels: > There was a referencing 3d module that pretty abandoned - not sure if there > is anything there worth your time. > So at this point I want to touch base with you guys, let you know these plans > and hear if there are any requirements I need to be aware of. I am also > interested

[Geotools-devel] starting 3D work

Hi everyone, I am in the process of initiating work on the extension of the 3D features in geotools and geoserver. As I understand there have been some recent developments in this area, including the support of W3DS requests and fixing the postgis 3d back-end. At this point, as I understand, the

Re: [Geotools-devel] extensive / interactive tests build broken in gt-swing module

I'm unable to reproduce this. Using latest trunk code, all tests pass on my system (osx 10.6.8, Java 1.6.0_29) including the JTextReporter tests that you cite as failing. Are the tests failing for anyone else ? Michael -