Re: [Geotools-devel] state of github switch

2012-06-30 Thread Andrea Aime
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 4:08 AM, Justin Deoliveira jdeol...@opengeo.orgwrote: Hi all, So I think from my side everything is in order to do the switch. However still a few things. 1. The proposal still lacks a couple of votes.

Re: [Geotools-devel] thoughts about git release and branching model

2012-06-30 Thread Andrea Aime
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 3:59 AM, Justin Deoliveira jdeol...@opengeo.orgwrote: 1. master - unstable, under active development, equivalent of what was trunk 2. n.x - stable, under active stable developer 3. (n-1).x - previous stable, being phased out For each stable branch we also

Re: [Geotools-devel] state of github switch

2012-06-30 Thread christian . mueller
Added my vote too (+1) Zitat von Andrea Aime andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it: On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 4:08 AM, Justin Deoliveira jdeol...@opengeo.orgwrote: Hi all, So I think from my side everything is in order to do the switch. However still a few things. 1. The proposal still lacks a

Re: [Geotools-devel] thoughts about git release and branching model

2012-06-30 Thread Michael Bedward
On 30 June 2012 16:47, Andrea Aime andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it wrote: Master wise, if we want to release a milestone, we just tag the master? However this will require a out of the pool period, even if a small one. My reading of Justin's proposed scheme was that milestones would never be

Re: [Geotools-devel] state of github switch

2012-06-30 Thread Jody Garnett
For number 2 ask on OSGeo channel and/or email sac committee. -- Jody Garnett On 30/06/2012, at 12:09 PM, Justin Deoliveira jdeol...@opengeo.org wrote: Hi all, So I think from my side everything is in order to do the switch. However still a few things. 1. The proposal still lacks a couple of

Re: [Geotools-devel] thoughts about git release and branching model

2012-06-30 Thread Andrea Aime
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Michael Bedward michael.bedw...@gmail.com wrote: On 30 June 2012 16:47, Andrea Aime andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it wrote: Master wise, if we want to release a milestone, we just tag the master? However this will require a out of the pool period, even if a

Re: [Geotools-devel] thoughts about git release and branching model

2012-06-30 Thread Jody Garnett
I would like to start the 9.x release branch early as uDig will be making use of milestone releases. -- Jody Garnett On 30/06/2012, at 12:00 PM, Justin Deoliveira jdeol...@opengeo.org wrote: Hi all, With the transition to git I have been thinking about how to manage branches/tags/etc... with

Re: [Geotools-devel] prepping for git transition

2012-06-30 Thread Jody Garnett
account id: - https://github.com/jive Fork: - https://github.com/jive/geotools Note: Need to change the description from Mirror of central GeoTools svn repository -- Jody Garnett On Saturday, 30 June 2012 at 12:12 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: Hi all, As we make the transition to github

Re: [Geotools-devel] state of github switch

2012-06-30 Thread Justin Deoliveira
OK, let's do it. For now I have just cleared out the svn commiter list except for a select few folks so none should hopefully have commit rights anymore. On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 3:06 AM, Jody Garnett jody.garn...@gmail.comwrote: For number 2 ask on OSGeo channel and/or email sac committee. --

[Geotools-devel] [Hudson] Hudson build is back to normal : geotools-master #4439

2012-06-30 Thread Hudson
See http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geotools-master/4439/ -- This message is automatically generated by Hudson. For more information on Hudson, see: http://hudson-ci.org/ -- Live Security Virtual Conference

Re: [Geotools-devel] state of github switch

2012-06-30 Thread Jody Garnett
Great idea Justin - that is thinking on your feet. I have successfully to fork, and get set up from github. Your instructions showed up here: - https://github.com/geotools/geotools/blob/master/docs/user/advanced/build/source.rst I took a detour to match how I do things for uDig (well actually

[Geotools-devel] replacing svn revision info plugin

2012-06-30 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Hi all, With the switch to git i have removed the execution of the svn revision plugin since it will now fail. Now, this leaves the question of what to replace it with. The obvious choice is what we tried before: https://github.com/ktoso/maven-git-commit-id-plugin Which works fairly well for

Re: [Geotools-devel] state of github switch

2012-06-30 Thread Justin Deoliveira
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Jody Garnett jody.garn...@gmail.comwrote: Great idea Justin - that is thinking on your feet. I have successfully to fork, and get set up from github. Your instructions showed up here: -

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] starting transition to github

2012-06-30 Thread Justin Deoliveira
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Andrea Aime andrea.a...@geo-solutions.itwrote: On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Justin Deoliveira jdeol...@opengeo.orgwrote: OK, folks, should be good to go. I have set up the organization for the geotools project project and all those who sent me there

Re: [Geotools-devel] replacing svn revision info plugin

2012-06-30 Thread Andrea Aime
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Justin Deoliveira jdeol...@opengeo.orgwrote: Hi all, With the switch to git i have removed the execution of the svn revision plugin since it will now fail. Now, this leaves the question of what to replace it with. The obvious choice is what we tried before:

Re: [Geotools-devel] git docs for transition

2012-06-30 Thread Andrea Aime
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Justin Deoliveira jdeol...@opengeo.orgwrote: Hey guys, I put together a first draft of a doc targeted at geotools committers. https://github.com/jdeolive/geotools/blob/gitdoc/docs/developer/procedures/git.rst Highlights of the doc: * Describes how we

Re: [Geotools-devel] git docs for transition

2012-06-30 Thread Justin Deoliveira
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Andrea Aime andrea.a...@geo-solutions.itwrote: On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Justin Deoliveira jdeol...@opengeo.orgwrote: Hey guys, I put together a first draft of a doc targeted at geotools committers.

Re: [Geotools-devel] replacing svn revision info plugin

2012-06-30 Thread Justin Deoliveira
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Andrea Aime andrea.a...@geo-solutions.itwrote: On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Justin Deoliveira jdeol...@opengeo.orgwrote: Hi all, With the switch to git i have removed the execution of the svn revision plugin since it will now fail. Now, this leaves the

[Geotools-devel] cutting 8.x branch

2012-06-30 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Hi all, With the git changeover winding down what do people think about a timeline for cutting the 8.x branch and making it the stable branch? For us geoserver folks we would like to follow suite as soon as possible, however we still have to go through our proposal process for a switch to git.

Re: [Geotools-devel] cutting 8.x branch

2012-06-30 Thread Andrea Aime
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Justin Deoliveira jdeol...@opengeo.orgwrote: Hi all, With the git changeover winding down what do people think about a timeline for cutting the 8.x branch and making it the stable branch? For us geoserver folks we would like to follow suite as soon as

[Geotools-devel] [Hudson] Build failed in Hudson: geotools-master-docs #1677

2012-06-30 Thread Hudson
See http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geotools-master-docs/1677/ -- [...truncated 2457 lines...] Running org.geotools.filter.MultiFilterTest Tests run: 10, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.089 sec Running

[Geotools-devel] [Hudson] Hudson build is back to normal : geotools-master-docs #1678

2012-06-30 Thread Hudson
See http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geotools-master-docs/1678/ -- This message is automatically generated by Hudson. For more information on Hudson, see: http://hudson-ci.org/ -- Live Security Virtual Conference

Re: [Geotools-devel] cutting 8.x branch

2012-06-30 Thread Jody Garnett
Stay on target stay on target :-) The plan outlined on the proposal page is to make a release from github to show we made it. After that point I would be happy to branch (cause we would know what we are branching from is solid and releasable). I did volunteer on that page to make an RC3 (or

Re: [Geotools-devel] git docs for transition

2012-06-30 Thread Jody Garnett
Read it, looks good but I do have questions about pushing. Say I work off my fork, and then push to canonical... I guess I will have to push to my fork as well? That is, how is one's fork kept in synch with the canonical one, I guess it's not something automatic? Sorry for the silly

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] starting transition to github

2012-06-30 Thread Jody Garnett
Just to report back, I went through the steps and confirm it is working for me. -- Jody Garnett On Sunday, 1 July 2012 at 1:21 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: OK, folks, should be good to go. I have set up the organization for the geotools project project and all those who sent me there