Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] starting transition to github

Just to report back, I went through the steps and confirm it is working for me. -- Jody Garnett On Sunday, 1 July 2012 at 1:21 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > OK, folks, should be good to go. I have set up the organization for the > geotools project project and all those who sent me there git

Re: [Geotools-devel] git docs for transition

> Read it, looks good but I do have questions about pushing. > Say I work off my fork, and then push to canonical... I guess I will have to > push to > my fork as well? > That is, how is one's fork kept in synch with the canonical one, I guess it's > not > something automatic? > > Sorry for the

Re: [Geotools-devel] cutting 8.x branch

Stay on target stay on target :-) The "plan" outlined on the proposal page is to make a release from github to show we made it. After that point I would be happy to branch (cause we would know what we are branching from is solid and releasable). I did volunteer on that page to make an RC3 (or

[Geotools-devel] [Hudson] Hudson build is back to normal : geotools-master-docs #1678

See -- This message is automatically generated by Hudson. For more information on Hudson, see: http://hudson-ci.org/ -- Live Security Virtual Conference

[Geotools-devel] [Hudson] Build failed in Hudson: geotools-master-docs #1677

See -- [...truncated 2457 lines...] Running org.geotools.filter.MultiFilterTest Tests run: 10, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.089 sec Running org.geotools.filter.FilterFil

Re: [Geotools-devel] cutting 8.x branch

On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Hi all, > > With the git changeover winding down what do people think about a timeline > for cutting the 8.x branch and making it the stable branch? > > For us geoserver folks we would like to follow suite as soon as possible, > however

[Geotools-devel] cutting 8.x branch

Hi all, With the git changeover winding down what do people think about a timeline for cutting the 8.x branch and making it the stable branch? For us geoserver folks we would like to follow suite as soon as possible, however we still have to go through our proposal process for a switch to git. Wh

Re: [Geotools-devel] replacing svn revision info plugin

On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Justin Deoliveira > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> With the switch to git i have removed the execution of the svn revision >> plugin since it will now fail. Now, this leaves the question of what to >> replace it wit

Re: [Geotools-devel] git docs for transition

On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Justin Deoliveira > wrote: > >> Hey guys, >> >> I put together a first draft of a doc targeted at geotools committers. >> >> >> https://github.com/jdeolive/geotools/blob/gitdoc/docs/developer/procedures/git.rst

Re: [Geotools-devel] git docs for transition

On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Hey guys, > > I put together a first draft of a doc targeted at geotools committers. > > > https://github.com/jdeolive/geotools/blob/gitdoc/docs/developer/procedures/git.rst > > Highlights of the doc: > > * Describes how we structure and

Re: [Geotools-devel] replacing svn revision info plugin

On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Hi all, > > With the switch to git i have removed the execution of the svn revision > plugin since it will now fail. Now, this leaves the question of what to > replace it with. The obvious choice is what we tried before: > > https://git

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] starting transition to github

On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Justin Deoliveira > wrote: > >> OK, folks, should be good to go. I have set up the organization for the >> geotools project project and all those who sent me there github id (and >> those i knew of before hand

Re: [Geotools-devel] thoughts about git release and branching model

On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 3:32 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Michael Bedward < > michael.bedw...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 30 June 2012 16:47, Andrea Aime wrote: >> >> > Master wise, if we want to release a milestone, we just tag the master? >> > However this will requi

Re: [Geotools-devel] thoughts about git release and branching model

On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Michael Bedward wrote: > On 30 June 2012 16:47, Andrea Aime wrote: > > > Master wise, if we want to release a milestone, we just tag the master? > > However this will require a "out of the pool" > > period, even if a small one. > > My reading of Justin's proposed

Re: [Geotools-devel] thoughts about git release and branching model

On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 12:47 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 3:59 AM, Justin Deoliveira > wrote: > >> >> 1. master - unstable, under active development, equivalent of what was >> trunk >> 2. n.x -> stable, under active "stable" developer >> 3. (n-1).x -> previous stable, b

Re: [Geotools-devel] state of github switch

On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: > Great idea Justin - that is thinking on your feet. I have successfully to > fork, and get set up from github. > > Your instructions showed up here: > - > https://github.com/geotools/geotools/blob/master/docs/user/advanced/build/source.rst >

[Geotools-devel] replacing svn revision info plugin

Hi all, With the switch to git i have removed the execution of the svn revision plugin since it will now fail. Now, this leaves the question of what to replace it with. The obvious choice is what we tried before: https://github.com/ktoso/maven-git-commit-id-plugin Which works fairly well for t

Re: [Geotools-devel] state of github switch

Great idea Justin - that is thinking on your feet. I have successfully to fork, and get set up from github. Your instructions showed up here: - https://github.com/geotools/geotools/blob/master/docs/user/advanced/build/source.rst I took a detour to match how I do things for uDig (well actually t

[Geotools-devel] [Hudson] Hudson build is back to normal : geotools-master #4439

See -- This message is automatically generated by Hudson. For more information on Hudson, see: http://hudson-ci.org/ -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclu

[Geotools-devel] [Hudson] Build failed in Hudson: geotools-master #4438

See -- Started by an SCM change Checkout:workspace / - hudson.remoting.LocalChannel@7e7ad43 Using strategy: Default Checkout:workspace /

Re: [Geotools-devel] state of github switch

OK, let's do it. For now I have just cleared out the svn commiter list except for a select few folks so none should hopefully have commit rights anymore. On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 3:06 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: > For number 2 ask on OSGeo channel and/or email sac committee. > > -- > Jody Garnett > >

Re: [Geotools-devel] prepping for git transition

account id: - https://github.com/jive Fork: - https://github.com/jive/geotools Note: Need to change the description from "Mirror of central GeoTools svn repository" -- Jody Garnett On Saturday, 30 June 2012 at 12:12 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Hi all, > > As we make the transition to gi

Re: [Geotools-devel] thoughts about git release and branching model

I would like to start the 9.x release branch early as uDig will be making use of milestone releases. -- Jody Garnett On 30/06/2012, at 12:00 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: Hi all, With the transition to git I have been thinking about how to manage branches/tags/etc... with respect to releases. H

Re: [Geotools-devel] thoughts about git release and branching model

On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Michael Bedward wrote: > On 30 June 2012 16:47, Andrea Aime wrote: > > > Master wise, if we want to release a milestone, we just tag the master? > > However this will require a "out of the pool" > > period, even if a small one. > > My reading of Justin's propose

Re: [Geotools-devel] state of github switch

For number 2 ask on OSGeo channel and/or email sac committee. -- Jody Garnett On 30/06/2012, at 12:09 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: Hi all, So I think from my side everything is in order to do the switch. However still a few things. 1. The proposal still lacks a couple of votes. http://docs

Re: [Geotools-devel] thoughts about git release and branching model

On 30 June 2012 16:47, Andrea Aime wrote: > Master wise, if we want to release a milestone, we just tag the master? > However this will require a "out of the pool" > period, even if a small one. My reading of Justin's proposed scheme was that milestones would never be coming from the master bran

Re: [Geotools-devel] state of github switch

Added my vote too (+1) Zitat von Andrea Aime : > On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 4:08 AM, Justin Deoliveira > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> So I think from my side everything is in order to do the switch. However >> still a few things. >> >> 1. The proposal still lacks a couple of votes. >> >> http://do