Re: [Geotools-devel] *proposal* (new version): Support for three-dimensional envelopes and bounding box filters

+1 from me. On 30/07/12 17:11, Niels Charlier wrote: > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Support+for+three-dimensional+envelopes+and+bounding+box+filters > > Okay, so I decided to remove the Envelope3D class, and merge it with > ReferencedEvelope3D, and make ReferencedEvelope3D derived fro

Re: [Geotools-devel] *proposal* (new version): Support for three-dimensional envelopes and bounding box filters

Thanks Niels +1 For me now, and yes I was slack as I was supposed to help you fix up the proposal after voting -1 :( -- Jody Garnett On Monday, 30 July 2012 at 7:11 PM, Niels Charlier wrote: > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Support+for+three-dimensional+envelopes+and+bounding+bo

Re: [Geotools-devel] Geotools 8.0 release note (draft)

That looks good,We tend to broadcast major release announcements a bit further then a normal release, as such we should find some more content - as this release has taken a while. Ideas:1) List the high value changes since 2.7.x (rather than jus

[Geotools-devel] Geotools 8.0 release note (draft)

Please let me know if you want anything added. The Geotools community is pleased to announce the availability of Geotools 8.0 for download on sourceforge. * geotools-8.0-bin.zip * geotools-8.0-doc.zip * geo

[Geotools-devel] [jira] (GEOT-4213) FunctionName conflict between FilterFunction_numPoints and Filter_Function_numInteriorRing

Jody Garn

Re: [Geotools-devel] *proposal* (new version): Support for three-dimensional envelopes and bounding box filters

Yeah it should definitely be in there. BBOX3D is the filter interface, which extends BBOX. On 07/30/2012 05:04 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: Looking much better Niels, i think this will slot in much cleaner. Is BBOX3D a new interface? I was just looking through the patch and not seeing it defi

[Geotools-devel] [Hudson] Build failed in Hudson: geotools-master-jdbc #36

See -- [...truncated 1381 lines...] at org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(ReflectionUtils.java:164) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.Provid

[Geotools-devel] [Hudson] Build failed in Hudson: geotools-master-jdbc #35

See -- [...truncated 1380 lines...] at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(ReflectionUtils.j

[Geotools-devel] [jira] (GEOT-4212) Backslashes will be squished on mysql datastore

Jo Ka

Re: [Geotools-devel] *proposal* (new version): Support for three-dimensional envelopes and bounding box filters

Looking much better Niels, i think this will slot in much cleaner. Is BBOX3D a new interface? I was just looking through the patch and not seeing it defined there although i do see the BBOX3DImpl class defined. On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 2:11 AM, Niels Charlier wrote: > > http://docs.codehaus.org/

[Geotools-devel] [Hudson] Hudson build is back to normal : geotools-master-jdbc #33

See -- This message is automatically generated by Hudson. For more information on Hudson, see: http://hudson-ci.org/ -- Live Security Virtual Conference Ex

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Board] Asking permission for re-licensing from LGPL to Apache

Hello Ben Thanks you very much for your reply. There is some notes in-line, followed by a request to the OSGeo board and a modification of our request to the GeoTools PMC. Le 30/07/12 08:00, Ben Caradoc-Davies a écrit : > although I am a member of the PMC, I am now writing as an individual: >

[Geotools-devel] *proposal* (new version): Support for three-dimensional envelopes and bounding box filters

http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Support+for+three-dimensional+envelopes+and+bounding+box+filters Okay, so I decided to remove the Envelope3D class, and merge it with ReferencedEvelope3D, and make ReferencedEvelope3D derived from ReferencedEnvelope. I hope this addresses the previously