On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 5:15 AM, Jody Garnett jody.garn...@gmail.com wrote:
If I can recommend calling it transform as the name reshape has caused
no end of confusion. Indeed you will find the current process called
transform.
Cool, will do that
+1 on the new module however!
I am very
Adam
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 5:53 AM, Gabriel Roldan grol...@opengeo.org wrote:
Hi Andrea,
I think this makes for a very welcomed contribution.
Of particular interest to me is the ability to reshape shapefiles.
It's actually something that's been rounding my mind for the last week
anticipating
Looks good, +1 for the module.
I see another possible future use case, access control for individual
attributes. It should be possible to define such a feature hiding some
attributes and use this feature for access control.
Another possibility could be adding converters returning null if a
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 10:17 AM, christian.muel...@nvoe.at wrote:
Looks good, +1 for the module.
I see another possible future use case, access control for individual
attributes. It should be possible to define such a feature hiding some
attributes and use this feature for access control.
Hi,
I'm not saying that you have to do everything at once, can you answer
the simple question above though?
Restating it: How sure you are that you're going to implement proper
encoding of 3D bboxes at the very least for JDBC stores (and possibly
for shapefiles as well?)
I am sorry, I
Andrea,
I am trying to make an overview of all the changes that require me to do
to the patch and proposal to get them passed.
This is what I have so far:
Patch:
Implement
ReferencedEnvelope3D.reference(org.opengis.geometry.Envelope) method
Implement better Transform method
Use
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Niels Charlier ni...@scitus.be wrote:
The current patch and proposal does not include these features. However, I'd
understand that WFS post requests need to at least support the same features
as wfs get requests. Please let me know the minimum requirements with
Afaik this works the way I explained before, that is, the Z dimension is left
unaltered during the reprojection.
Which is not true reprojection, but what we can afford given that the vertical
transformation module is not working
I reprojected from WGS84 to WGS66 which only differ in their Z
On 08/06/2012 12:23 PM, Niels Charlier wrote:
Afaik this works the way I explained before, that is, the Z dimension is left
unaltered during the reprojection.
Which is not true reprojection, but what we can afford given that the
vertical
transformation module is not working
I reprojected
* for the trasform method imho a better, but simple implementation
would be to reproject the x,y and leave the Z
unaltered (but preserve it). This is what JTS.tarnsform(Geometry,
MathTransform) does today, so it would also preserve
consistency within the library
Actually, the
On 08/06/2012 01:56 PM, Niels Charlier wrote:
* for the trasform method imho a better, but simple implementation
would be to reproject the x,y and leave the Z
unaltered (but preserve it). This is what JTS.tarnsform(Geometry,
MathTransform) does today, so it would also preserve
Update
Patch:
+ Implement
ReferencedEnvelope3D.reference(org.opengis.geometry.Envelope) method
+ Implement better Transform method
+ Use CRS.toSRS( bounds.getCoordinateReferenceSystem() ) to return
SRS string in filter class
+ Remove filtervisitor hack and update
Participants
---
Attending:
- Andrea Aime (part)
- Ben Caradoc-Davies
- Jody Garnett
Agenda
==
- Dual-License Request
- Upcoming Board Meeting
- GeoServer PSC refresh
- Security in GeoServer 2.2.x
- Reshape/Transform module in GeoTools
- GeoTools 8 Release
Dual-License Request
Hey guys,
Sorry I couldn't make it today, it is a holiday in Canada and i am not
working a regular working day.
Regarding the security stuff for 2.2.x being a blocker is that referring to
what Christian recently posted? Looks like it, will respond to that thread.
-Justin
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at
Thanks for putting that together Andrea. Looked it over and made some
edits. Mostly just some minor rewording, spelling, etc... You can find the
result here.
https://github.com/jdeolive/geoserver/blob/release_schedule_doc/doc/en/developer/source/release-schedule/index.rst
If you have no
On 07/08/12 00:57, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
Sorry I couldn't make it today, it is a holiday in Canada and i am not
working a regular working day.
And it is the two weeks in which Canada isn't frozen solid. ;-)
Regarding the security stuff for 2.2.x being a blocker is that referring
to what
Geotools 8.0 Released
The Geotools community is pleased to announce the availability of Geotools 8.0
for download on
sourceforgehttp://sourceforge.net/projects/geotools/files/GeoTools%208.0%20Releases/8.0/.
*
18 matches
Mail list logo
