Re: [Geotools-devel] removing xerces dependency

2012-10-25 Thread Michael Bedward
Thanks for that explanation Justin. I know Martin still tries to cater for Java < 1.5 but xerces is not used in any of the core classes that make up the JTS maven artifacts. Michael On 26 October 2012 10:40, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > > Btw, i did this on the branch i pushed up, that is added a

Re: [Geotools-devel] removing xerces dependency

2012-10-25 Thread Justin Deoliveira
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Michael Bedward wrote: > On 26 October 2012 06:24, Gabriel Roldan wrote: > > re xerces, we'd also need to exclude it from the JTS dependency: > > [INFO] | +- com.vividsolutions:jts:jar:1.12:compile > > [INFO] | | \- xerces:xercesImpl:jar:2.7.1:compile (version

Re: [Geotools-devel] removing xerces dependency

2012-10-25 Thread Michael Bedward
On 26 October 2012 06:24, Gabriel Roldan wrote: > re xerces, we'd also need to exclude it from the JTS dependency: > [INFO] | +- com.vividsolutions:jts:jar:1.12:compile > [INFO] | | \- xerces:xercesImpl:jar:2.7.1:compile (version managed from > 2.4.0) > The JTS jars from Maven only include th

Re: [Geotools-devel] removing xerces dependency

2012-10-25 Thread Gabriel Roldan
re xerces, we'd also need to exclude it from the JTS dependency: [INFO] | +- com.vividsolutions:jts:jar:1.12:compile [INFO] | | \- xerces:xercesImpl:jar:2.7.1:compile (version managed from 2.4.0) I'm in favor of reducing the number of embedded databases, but taking bdb je off might be good enou

Re: [Geotools-devel] Dealing with extended capabilities in ows 1.0 with encoder delegates

2012-10-25 Thread Andrea Aime
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Hey Andrea, > > SO yeah, the way the encoder delegate works now is if an object to be > encoded doesn't match a binding, it is checked as an instance of > EncoderDelegate. And if so the encoder control is passed off to it. So > indeed on

Re: [Geotools-devel] removing xerces dependency

2012-10-25 Thread Andrea Aime
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: > So what do we have let for embedded database solution? hsql for gt-epsg-hsql > ... Right, at the moment we have hsql in geotools for the EPSG database, and Berkely DB + H2 in GeoServer for other purposes Berkely DB can be removed on trunk u

Re: [Geotools-devel] Redoing 8.3 release

2012-10-25 Thread Alessio Fabiani
Hello Jody, yes, basically when I launched Hdson scripts to produce the release artifacts I have not specified the revision ID on the REV field since I tought it was automatic. So basically I released the master branch instead of 8.x one. == Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solu