On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 11:45 PM, Jody Garnett jody.garn...@gmail.comwrote:
Andrea do we have any chance of doing what the OGC wants? Ie cutting cold
turkey over to the new/official xlink schema (even for all the old
schemas?).
I understand they have retroactively applied the official xlink
On 04/12/12 23:41, Andrea Aime wrote:
However, all the schemas in the main gml 3.2 are also different in some way,
thought I've not verified to what extent)
When Justin created the original GML 3.2.1 bindings, he modified or
removed several types in xsd files to break cyclic type definitions
Not sure what is actionalble out of this thread but would it help to update
all of our internal schemas to the latest schemas that contain all the
xlink fixes? Especially the gml 3.2 schema which seems to have factored out
all the iso schema (gcd, gmx, etc...)
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 2:25 AM, Ben
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Justin Deoliveira jdeol...@opengeo.orgwrote:
Not sure what is actionalble out of this thread but would it help to
update all of our internal schemas to the latest schemas that contain all
the xlink fixes? Especially the gml 3.2 schema which seems to have
