[Geotools-devel] [jira] (GEOT-4713) Add support for citext data in the postgis data store

Title: Message Title Andrea Aime created an issue

[Geotools-devel] Backporting one liner improvement on stable series

Hi, I've just completed a patch provided by a GeoTools user to support the citext postgresql extension data type ( http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/citext.html) by adding a online test for it: https://github.com/geotools/geotools/commit/0d3fbe332c62530090b3798b50b5c023d7f4fe68 The patch p

Re: [Geotools-devel] Backporting one liner improvement on stable series

I have no objection. On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 4:48 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > I've just completed a patch provided by a GeoTools user to support > the citext postgresql extension data type ( > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/citext.html) > by adding a online test for it: > > https:/

[Geotools-devel] 10.5 release

Hi all, Looking at the road map [1] there is no planned 10.5 release but just wanted to double check no-one would object to one. Reason is for the GeoGit project to take advantage of the recent changes to the spatialite module, which is where the fix actually originated from. If no objections I h

Re: [Geotools-devel] 10.5 release

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Justin Deoliveira < jdeol...@boundlessgeo.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Looking at the road map [1] there is no planned 10.5 release but just > wanted to double check no-one would object to one. Reason is for the GeoGit > project to take advantage of the recent changes

Re: [Geotools-devel] 10.5 release

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > The roadmap has a typo, 10.5 should be released April 18th along with > GeoServer 2.4.5. > I mean, at least I believe it's a typo, not sure if Jody had an actual > reason to skip a number in GeoTools (but not in GeoServer) > > >> >> If no objec

Re: [Geotools-devel] 10.5 release

I see, thanks Andrea. So how would people feel about a small tweak to the roadmap. - GeoTools 10.5 release now - GeoTools 10.6 released April 18th in conjunction with GeoServer 2.4.5 If no objections I will update the roadmap to reflect. On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:

Re: [Geotools-devel] 10.5 release

Just a typo, I am also waiting to see if everyone likes the "single roadmap" (and I can remove the per release one). I thought that 10.5 was scheduled for next month? Jody Garnett On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 4:35 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Justin Deoliveira < > jdeol

Re: [Geotools-devel] 10.5 release

Caught up with Justin, updated the schedule. Still owe everyone a blog post explaining the schedule change and will do so this week. Jody Garnett On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 6:15 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: > Just a typo, I am also waiting to see if everyone likes the "single > roadmap" (and I can remo

[Geotools-devel] [jira] (GEOT-4714) Allow normal sqlite and spatialite sqlite jdbc drivers to co-exist

Title: Message Title Justin Deoliveira created an issue

Re: [Geotools-devel] Backporting one liner improvement on stable series

+1. Such a tiny change, so much test coverage. Please go ahead. Kind regards, Ben. On 25/02/14 19:48, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > I've just completed a patch provided by a GeoTools user to support > the citext postgresql extension data type > (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/citext.html)

Re: [Geotools-devel] Backporting one liner improvement on stable series

Hey Andrea, I figured you might want this in the 10.5 release and I would like to go ahead with building it so I took the liberty of backporting this. Hope that is ok. On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies < ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au> wrote: > +1. Such a tiny change, so much test

[Geotools-devel] GeoPackage GridFormat for Rasters

Hi all! I recently worked on adding a GridFormat for geopackage rasters. The geopackage module already has a really nice mosaic gridformat for geopackage tiles that I borrowed from extensively. I did this before realizing that the geopackage standard dropped raster support, so I am not sure i

Re: [Geotools-devel] 10.5 release

Justin, OneGeology are eagerly awaiting the release of GeoServer 2.4.5 (originally scheduled for February), and cannot wait until April. If they get 2.4.5 or 2.5.0 by 15 March, they will publicise it as their reference platform. Too early for 2.5.0, so 2.4.5 (which has

Re: [Geotools-devel] Backporting one liner improvement on stable series

On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 2:43 AM, Justin Deoliveira < jdeol...@boundlessgeo.com> wrote: > Hey Andrea, I figured you might want this in the 10.5 release and I would > like to go ahead with building it so I took the liberty of backporting > this. Hope that is ok. > Ah yes, thank you, very thoughtful

Re: [Geotools-devel] 10.5 release

On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 6:11 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies < ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au> wrote: > Justin, > > OneGeology are eagerly awaiting the release of > GeoServer 2.4.5 (originally scheduled for February), and cannot wait > until April. If they get 2.4.5 or 2.5.0 by 15 Mar