[Geotools-devel] streaming renderer clip geometry [GEOT-5322]

2015-12-15 Thread Jody Garnett
Follow up to today's meeting and review of https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/1067 Dave was kind enough to talk me through it, reviewed code, fixed up formatting etc... and it looks good to go. There is one part I want to focus on (just to make sure geotools-devel is aware of the change) -

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools / GeoServer Meeting 2015-12-15

2015-12-15 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
GeoTools / GeoServer Meeting 2015-12-15 === Attending - Ben Caradoc-Davies Brad Hards Jody Garnett Jukka Rahkonen Torben Barsballe Andrea Aime Apologies - Ian Turton Agenda -- - GeoServer PSC changes - Releases - Java 8 - FOSS4G (Bonn, A

[Geotools-devel] [JIRA] (GEOT-5323) Remove load library calls preventing java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError

2015-12-15 Thread Jody Garnett [Administrator] (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Jody Garnett [Adminis

Re: [Geotools-devel] Any plans dropping deprecated CQL syntax for 'ID IN'?

2015-12-15 Thread Jody Garnett
Reading the page ... Deprecated Syntax ::= [ "NOT" ] "IN" "(" {"," } ")" ::= New Syntax (since 2.7.rc1) ::= [ "NOT" ] "IN" "(" {"," } ")" ::= | Am I missing something? It looks like the new syntax just allows integers or character strings? -- Jody Garnett On 15

Re: [Geotools-devel] Any plans dropping deprecated CQL syntax for 'ID IN'?

2015-12-15 Thread Andrea Aime
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Mark Prins wrote: > yes; I think it would cause some grief. I'm not pushing for this but > having one syntax flagged as something one should not use doesn't really > make much sense to me if there are no ill side-effects nor plans to drop it. > I agree... perso

Re: [Geotools-devel] Any plans dropping deprecated CQL syntax for 'ID IN'?

2015-12-15 Thread Mark Prins
yes; I think it would cause some grief. I'm not pushing for this but having one syntax flagged as something one should not use doesn't really make much sense to me if there are no ill side-effects nor plans to drop it. Mark 2015-12-15 12:27 GMT+01:00 Andrea Aime : > Hmm... that would be a backwa

Re: [Geotools-devel] Any plans dropping deprecated CQL syntax for 'ID IN'?

2015-12-15 Thread Andrea Aime
Hmm... that would be a backwards compatibility breach, I'm not so eager to remove that support Cheers Andrea On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Mark Prins wrote: > Out of curiosity (and because I'm running into some trouble having tables > with an id column that's not the primary key) what is th

[Geotools-devel] Any plans dropping deprecated CQL syntax for 'ID IN'?

2015-12-15 Thread Mark Prins
Out of curiosity (and because I'm running into some trouble having tables with an id column that's not the primary key) what is the plan (if any) for dropping the deprecated "id in" syntax from CQL? (So that "id" will be handled as an ordinary attribute) >From the docs [1] it seems that it was dep

Re: [Geotools-devel] Asunto: Voting for "Implement-a-pure-java-Dbase-indexing-to-optimize-shapefile-access" proposal

2015-12-15 Thread A Huarte
Hi, I have experimented with a new open dbase-index format. This format is a simple optimized chain of keys and related DBF-records. It is implemented in a new plugin called "gt-shapefile-dbx" and also provides a tool to create these files.  I have written a report with performance results for s