Merged on master, with Daniele's approval.
Any objection to backporting this one to 15.x / 2.9.x?
As this is a new feature and an upgraded dependency, I do not intend to
backport to 14.x / 2.8.x.
Kind regards,
Ben.
On 14/06/16 23:28, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> NetCDF-Java 4.6.6 has been
Or if the March/September cadence is useful to ensure availability, we
could wait until March (that is have a long 2.9.x cycle).
Or we could choose an October release for 2.10.0, that is one month
late. We are trying to make up two months, so we could take one from
2.9.x stable and one from
+1 for rotating the meeting.
All voting is already conducted on the mailing lists, as it should be,
to keep everything open and transparent. Only minor issues are handled
informally. Nothing else can be formally agreed in a PMC / PSC meeting
until all voting members have had a chance to vote.
I was just updating the schedule, based on what I remembered of the
discussion. This is why it is in the meeting notes so we can sort this out.
So if we go the other way are we looking at a November release?
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 12:16 PM Simone Giannecchini <
Hi All,
one thing strikes me here:
"We are looking at a short release cycle due to release delays of 2.9."
Looking as in "yeah, that would be a bad idea"? :)
What is the rationale behind making the life of 2.9 shorter? Its birth
was difficult hence I would expect extra care before moving to
Dear Devon,
a few things:
-0- we should really get rid of this CatalogManager as is (a class
with only static methods as its state its spread over N other classes)
-1- we can already mosaick images with different colormodels (to a
certain extent, it does not make sense to mosaick a float raster
Title: Message Title
Mauro Bartolomeoli
I am not too fond on this name but as a general rule of thumb I always
suggest to refrain from the renaming attitude unless the original name
is _really_ bad.
This is also important as we would have in some cases to keep the old
one around if it was a public class or interface.
Regards,
Simone
Dear Ben,
I just sent a separate email for an overlapping topic.
On our side times between 10 a.m. and 7 p.m.CEST would work.
Regards,
Simone Giannecchini
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts!
Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
==
Ing. Simone Giannecchini
@simogeo
Dear All,
First of all I apologize for the crossposting.
I wanted to discuss alternatives for PSC meetings in order to be able
to attend (and same goes for the other people on this side of the
world).
First thing first, there is no way to find a decent time that would
fit all the interested
10 matches
Mail list logo
