Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: Refactor ImageMosaic index management

Thanks, proposal is clear, scope/purpose clear, technical details are easier to follow with class diagram. +1 And it looks like you are pretty much done the work, except for user docs... -- Jody Garnett On 21 June 2016 at 17:04, Devon Tucker wrote: > Yes, it's ready

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: Refactor ImageMosaic index management

Yes, it's ready for review :D On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > We can always squash the commits when merging to master. > > Is the proposal ready for review now? > > -- > Jody Garnett > > On 21 June 2016 at 16:55, Devon Tucker

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: Refactor ImageMosaic index management

We can always squash the commits when merging to master. Is the proposal ready for review now? -- Jody Garnett On 21 June 2016 at 16:55, Devon Tucker wrote: > Ok so after going down the road of using the PropertiesCollector interface > for doing the granule geometry

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: Refactor ImageMosaic index management

Ok so after going down the road of using the PropertiesCollector interface for doing the granule geometry handling and decided to go with my original plan of creating a separate interface for this. I have updated the proposal accordingly. Also, I created a pull request for reference, since it

[Geotools-devel] [JIRA] (GEOT-5447) PropertyDataStore fails to write geometries with 3d ordinates

Title: Message Title Andrea Aime

[Geotools-devel] [JIRA] (GEOT-5446) SimpleFeatureImpl.equals fails to tell apart features with same 2d ordinates, but different z

Title: Message Title Andrea Aime