Hi all!
I have been investigating GeoTool's Projection support and found that
CRS.parseText() fails for WagnerV WKT. It seems that an entry is missing in
the org.geotools.referencing.opereation.MathTransformProvider SPI. If I add
the following entry
org.geotools.referencing.operation.projection
Nuno,
that looks like a good idea to me. app-schema has already been
restructured once to accommodate the
modules/unsupported/app-schema/webservice backend. Much of the complex
feature support was later pulled into the complex module. These changes
should make app-schema easier to extend. +1 f
+0. No objection.
On 25/10/16 20:44, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Cough cough... anyone? :-)
>
> Cheers
> Andrea
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Andrea Aime
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I'm writing this mail to propose the move of the geopackge module to
>> supported land.
>> The proposal is backed by this
Builds locally, javadocs, user docs all seem okay, readme links are correct.
--
Jody Garnett
On 26 October 2016 at 16:03, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Issue is now fixed, please review http://ares.boundlessgeo.com/geotools/
> release/16.0 !
>
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
> On 26 October 2016 at 06:29, Ian Tu
Issue is now fixed, please review
http://ares.boundlessgeo.com/geotools/release/16.0 !
--
Jody Garnett
On 26 October 2016 at 06:29, Ian Turton wrote:
> I'm seeing a test failure in gt-imagemosaic
>
> Failed tests:
> HeterogenousCRSTest.testHeterogeneousCRS:56->testMosaic:105 Images are
> visi
And cite has now passed - so we are back in the game.
version = 2.10-SNAPSHOT
git revision = 6fb4c93df94326a9939dba371a5040e03f127a5b
git branch = origin/2.10.x
build date = 26-Oct-2016 21:22
geotools version = 16-SNAPSHOT
geotools revision = b7852cddc7079d0dfe5d7c37203b925aa1ef6deb
geowebcache ve
Yep, I can confirm that now Geotools 16.x builds fine on my laptop, thanks
Devon!
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 9:49 PM, Jody Garnett
wrote:
> Thanks, merged and backported, release should be back on.
>
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
> On 26 October 2016 at 11:15, Devon Tucker wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Apo
Thanks, merged and backported, release should be back on.
--
Jody Garnett
On 26 October 2016 at 11:15, Devon Tucker wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Apologies for the issue. I have a PR ready for a workaround:
>
> https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/1365
>
> Not ideal, but I tried what I thought w
Hello all,
Apologies for the issue. I have a PR ready for a workaround:
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/1365
Not ideal, but I tried what I thought would be the simplest fix and it
didn't work. Unfortunately configuration initialization for ImageMosaic is
a bit messy.
Let me know if th
Ah!
I experienced the same failure while preparing this PR:
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/1363
Then I noticed the Travis build was passing and I thought the failure was
specific to my laptop... seems like it's not.
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Ian Turton wrote:
>
>
> Here i
Here is the screen shot of the failing test images -
Failed tests:
HeterogenousCRSTest.testHeterogeneousCRS:56->testMosaic:105 Images are
visibly different, found 2147483647 different pixels, against a threshold
of 1000
Ian
--
Ian Turton
--
Sorry i was away from internet last week. +1
I am not familiar with the codebase, but glad to see another module added
to the mix. This is the same module shipped by boundless to our customers
giving a start for "used in anger".
--
Jody Garnett
On 20 October 2016 at 03:51, Andrea Aime
wrote:
I'm seeing a test failure in gt-imagemosaic
Failed tests:
HeterogenousCRSTest.testHeterogeneousCRS:56->testMosaic:105 Images are
visibly different, found 2147483647 different pixels, against a threshold
of 1000
Looking at the output shows they are definitely different with what looks
like a pr
goto http://ares.boundlessgeo.com/geotools/release/16.0/ to check out all
that exciting 16.0 goodness.
Ian
--
Ian Turton
--
The Command Line: Reinvented for Modern Developers
Did the resurgence of CLI tooling catch you b
I thought I +1'd this but it was still in draft :-)
Ian
On 26 October 2016 at 09:11, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> And my +1 too, of course. I'm rather surprised to see so little interest
> in geopackage...
>
> Cheers
> Andrea
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 9:47 AM, Simone Giannecchini <
> simone.giannecch
And my +1 too, of course. I'm rather surprised to see so little interest in
geopackage...
Cheers
Andrea
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 9:47 AM, Simone Giannecchini <
simone.giannecch...@geo-solutions.it> wrote:
> Well, if nobody else is interested I'll give my +1.
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Simone Giannecchi
16 matches
Mail list logo
