Re: [Geotools-devel] Promoting gt-ysld to a supported module

somewhere - http://docs.geotools.org/latest/userguide/welcome/architecture.html -- Jody Garnett On 26 January 2017 at 17:18, Torben Barsballe wrote: > Okay, in that case gt-ysld would become an extension. > Thanks Jody. That should probably be documented somewhere. > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 5

Re: [Geotools-devel] Promoting gt-ysld to a supported module

Okay, in that case gt-ysld would become an extension. Thanks Jody. That should probably be documented somewhere. On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > plugins extend factory SPI somehow > extensions add more stuff on top of the core geotools library > > -- > Jody Garnett > > On

Re: [Geotools-devel] Promoting gt-ysld to a supported module

plugins extend factory SPI somehow extensions add more stuff on top of the core geotools library -- Jody Garnett On 26 January 2017 at 15:16, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > +1. Thanks, Torben, that is quite thorough. > > Jody, do we have a policy for which supported modules are plugins and > which

Re: [Geotools-devel] Promoting gt-ysld to a supported module

Thanks, Torben. It does look to me like gt-ysld meets the definition of a plugin. Jody, any opinion? Kind regards, Ben. On 27/01/17 12:48, Torben Barsballe wrote: > Ben: > > With respect to plugins vs extensions, I did find some "definitions" here: > http://docs.geotools.org/latest/developer/pro

Re: [Geotools-devel] Promoting gt-ysld to a supported module

Ben: With respect to plugins vs extensions, I did find some "definitions" here: http://docs.geotools.org/latest/developer/procedures/check.html Torben On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > +1. Great work on this Torben. > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 4:17 PM Ben Caradoc-Davies

Re: [Geotools-devel] Promoting gt-ysld to a supported module

+1. Great work on this Torben. On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 4:17 PM Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > +1. Thanks, Torben, that is quite thorough. > > Jody, do we have a policy for which supported modules are plugins and > which are extensions? I noticed that Torben used the term "plugin" and > realised that

Re: [Geotools-devel] Promoting gt-ysld to a supported module

+1. Thanks, Torben, that is quite thorough. Jody, do we have a policy for which supported modules are plugins and which are extensions? I noticed that Torben used the term "plugin" and realised that I do not know if we have rules. Is there a difference, or is this just an historical oddity? Ki

Re: [Geotools-devel] Promoting gt-ysld to a supported module

+1 -- Jody Garnett On 26 January 2017 at 10:41, Torben Barsballe wrote: > The gt-ysld module is now ready to be considered for a supported module. > > I would like to request that this module be approved for inclusion as a > supported plugin in the upcoming 16.2 / 17-beta releases. > The module

Re: [Geotools-devel] Promoting gt-ysld to a supported module

The gt-ysld module is now ready to be considered for a supported module. I would like to request that this module be approved for inclusion as a supported plugin in the upcoming 16.2 / 17-beta releases. The module conforms to the requirements

Re: [Geotools-devel] draft blog post for 15.4 is ready

Thanks Ian, - added a title - "release" and "maintenance" labels - you got the reminder that this is the last 15.x release; I changed the "upgrade now" from a passive recommend planning your upgrade, to a more direct "upgrade now" (the time for plans has passed). - Not sure of the value of cutting

[Geotools-devel] draft blog post for 15.4 is ready

If any one who is good at speeling or grammer would like to check it. Ian -- Ian Turton -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot__