Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools 20.2 release scheduled for Friday, Jan 18

2019-01-16 Thread Jody Garnett
Thanks Torben, this will be a good test of the updated repository release credentials :) -- Jody Garnett On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 at 15:17, Torben Barsballe wrote: > Hello all, > > Just a reminder that the GeoTools 20.2 release is happening this Friday. > If there are any last-minute changes you

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools 20.2 release scheduled for Friday, Jan 18

2019-01-16 Thread Torben Barsballe
Hello all, Just a reminder that the GeoTools 20.2 release is happening this Friday. If there are any last-minute changes you want in this release, be sure to have them committed/backported before Friday. Cheers, Torben ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list

[Geotools-devel] Jenkins build is back to normal : geotools-java11 #131

2019-01-16 Thread monitor
See ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Re: [Geotools-devel] geotools 2019 budget

2019-01-16 Thread Simone Giannecchini
same line here Regards, Simone Giannecchini == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Simone Giannecchini @simogeo Founder/Director GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313

Re: [Geotools-devel] geotools 2019 budget

2019-01-16 Thread Ian Turton
I think I would need a lot of convincing to support this idea. Is there really any evidence of LGPL putting people off? Ian On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 at 08:46, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 11:14 PM Jody Garnett > wrote: > >> - The idea has also come up (with restriction Apache

Re: [Geotools-devel] geotools 2019 budget

2019-01-16 Thread Andrea Aime
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 11:14 PM Jody Garnett wrote: > - The idea has also come up (with restriction Apache projects have in > using LGPL) to relicense the library. I think the vast majority of the code > base is covered under our code contribution agreement, and could just be > relicensed.