Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools 23-RC ready for testing - part II the return of testing

2020-03-10 Thread Jody Garnett
Some notes from testing the project download: 1) README.md links - broken link to https://docs.geotools.org/stable/developer/procedures/contribute.html - broken link to: https://docs.geotools.org/stable/developer/procedures/pull_requests.html 2) VERSION.txt Does not have the correct

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools 23-RC ready for testing - part II the return of testing

2020-03-10 Thread Jody Garnett
Build is once again complete, please test artifacts and report back: - https://build.geoserver.org/view/release/job/geotools-release/230/artifact/build/release/distribution/23-RC/ Andrea if testing is successful please proceed with geowebcache, or I will catch it tomorrow after work. -- Jody

Re: [Geotools-devel] geopkg issue

2020-03-10 Thread Jody Garnett
Thanks David, reviewing now - I have some questions we can discuss on the ticket. (My own understanding of geopackage is no doubt the limiting factor here) -- Jody Garnett On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 at 14:17, David Blasby wrote: > I put together a pull request - very minor change. I also put in a

Re: [Geotools-devel] geopkg issue

2020-03-10 Thread David Blasby
I put together a pull request - very minor change. I also put in a test case that messes with the timezone -- hopefully this will make sure this doesn't happen again. https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/2837 Thanks for the help/ideas/code Andrea! Couldn't have done it without you! dave

Re: [Geotools-devel] geopkg issue

2020-03-10 Thread Andrea Aime
I've found the flags related to local date handling: https://github.com/geotools/geotools/blob/029dc5c8ccc503de3cfd7f4d1c939d8056c260c4/modules/library/metadata/src/main/java/org/geotools/util/factory/GeoTools.java#L239

[Geotools-devel] geopkg issue

2020-03-10 Thread David Blasby
I'll look into the problem this afternoon. The timezone handling in sql lite is very limited and confusing. Cheers, David ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools 23-RC ready for testing

2020-03-10 Thread Ian Turton
JDBC stores I think. This certainly sounds familiar Ian On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 at 10:05, Andrea Aime wrote: > Btw, I think Ian at one point worked on a setting on whether to prefer > local time zone vs GMT... but I don't > quite remember what it is supposed to affect... GML encoders? Converters?

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools 23-RC ready for testing

2020-03-10 Thread Nuno Oliveira
Hi all, thx for the release Jody, got a green build here: [INFO] Reactor Summary for GeoTools 23-RC: [INFO]  [INFO] GeoTools ... SUCCESS [  0.768 s] [INFO] Build tools for Geotools 2 . SUCCESS [  0.044 s] [INFO] Maven plugins for

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools 23-RC ready for testing

2020-03-10 Thread Andrea Aime
Btw, I think Ian at one point worked on a setting on whether to prefer local time zone vs GMT... but I don't quite remember what it is supposed to affect... GML encoders? Converters? Data stores? Cheers Andrea On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 10:48 AM Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi Jody, > tried with a local

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools 23-RC ready for testing

2020-03-10 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi Jody, tried with a local build with no remote repo, the GeoPackage tests fail, seems a timezone issue --- Test set: org.geotools.geopkg.GeoPkgDatetimeTest

Re: [Geotools-devel] proposal: reduce proposal time limit to ten days

2020-03-10 Thread Ian Turton
+0 on length +1 on a limit Ian On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 at 19:36, Jody Garnett wrote: > Our current proposal time limit was set in the days of subversion when we > had a single "trunk" and relatively strong divisions between modules in our > library. The idea being that a 3-day waiting period was

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools 23-RC ready for testing

2020-03-10 Thread Jody Garnett
Build is complete, please test artifacts and report back: - https://build.geoserver.org/view/release/job/geotools-release/229/ Andrea if testing is successful please proceed with geowebcache, or I will catch it after work tomorrow if you are busy. -- Jody Garnett

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools 23.x stable created

2020-03-10 Thread Jody Garnett
Small update, GeoTools 23-RC revision is 98252c14d12485497354e91b617646269534057c (Had to commit the README and documentation links to "stable") -- Jody Garnett On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 at 23:38, Jody Garnett wrote: > Release candidate is underway, thanks for patience on this: > - The 23.x stable

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools 23.x stable created

2020-03-10 Thread Jody Garnett
Release candidate is underway, thanks for patience on this: - The 23.x stable branch has been created, along with jira, and build.geosever.org jobs . - Master is updated to 24-SNAPSHOT - I added an ant