Re: [Geotools-devel] mkdocs proposal

Andrea: 1. To migrate GeoTools I need to make one major improvement to the script -> processing the include-source directives into an equivalent mkdocs extension. Material for MkDocs recommends

Re: [Geotools-devel] mkdocs proposal

Hì Jody, I'm all for the simplest possible approach to writing documentation, and one less syntax to master is a benefit. Some questions: - The automation is impressive, how much work do you reckon it would be migrate GeoTools? - Could you also socialize the idea in GeoServer, so that we

Re: [Geotools-devel] ESRI Shapefile read DBF-only data

Hi, I'm not opposed, but a shapefile has a quite specific definition, it requires a minimum of shp, shx and dbf to be called a shapefile. I may be amenable to allow shapefile datastore to read just dbf files as well, but nowhere in the documentation they should be called "shapefile". I'd go and ad