>>
>> Cheers
>> Andrea
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 9:49 AM Patrick Valsecchi <
>> patrick.valsec...@camptocamp.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> From the [1] page, if I try to download the JAR, I get the [2] link
Hello,
>From the [1] page, if I try to download the JAR, I get the [2] link.
Following this link leads to a "Authorization Required" error
Is something missconfigured on the server?
Thanks
[1] https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.geotools/gt-main/20.3
[2]
http://download.osgeo.org/webdav/geot
Hello,
While investigating a bug [1] in MapFish print, I've found what I consider
a bug in DefaultFeatureCollection.getBounds method.
Maybe I'm wrong, but I usually assume that a getter is thread safe at the
instance level as long as the instance is not modified by another thread.
So I was a bit
Hi,
I've followed Ben's recommendations (thanks Ben) and hooked SchemaResolver
into the Parser. It was a bit tricky to find out where to hook it, but now
it works fine.
For those having the same problem in their project, here is my commit:
https://github.com/mapfish/mapfish-print/commit/3e1bb081a
Hi
After investigating some transient slowness in Mapfish Print (a webapp that
uses GeoTools V11.0) I've found out that for each and every GML it is
parsing, it is downloading the XSDs from external web sites. For example
[1].
That causes us several problems:
1. Very very slow if the web site
Pull request updated.
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Patrick Valsecchi <
> patrick.valsec...@camptocamp.com> wrote:
>
>> Where can I add this configuration? I'm not aware of a GeoTools
>> configuration file
> by a flag or parameter.
> Having a configurable batching size, defaulting to 1, would probably be a
> good way, with
> some documentation explaining the benefits and risks of increasing the
> batch size to a
> value greater than one
>
> Cheers
> Andrea
>
>
>
While reviewing my batch insert pull request [1], Andrea Aime did a couple
of coments [2] [3] that calls for a broader discussion.
In summary, I'm trying to improve the GeoTools performance when inserting a
lot of features in the DB. For that, I need to group the insertions
together in order to le
Title: Message Title
Patrick Valsecchi created an issue
nce.
If a main contributor could have a look at my modifs and tell me if I'm on
a good track, I would be very happy.
Thanks and CU.
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Patrick Valsecchi <
> patrick.valsec...@camptocamp.com> wrot
Hi,
I'm using geogig to import/export data from/to Oracle. As I was a bit
surprised by the slowness of the export operation, I've looked a bit at how
it's done.
Geogig asks geotools to insert one feature at a time. As I was planning to
fix that and gouping the insertions a bit, I've looked at how
I'm a bit rusty in Oracle, but if I remember well, oracle parses and builds
a plan only once. Then, when the same query comes again, it uses the cached
plan. So the optimization of ignoring the second expression of the OR is
made impossible because of the variable bindings.
Also, that maybe explai
two different bboxes, at least),
> see this presentation, it contains
> a description as to why we have to create two bbox filters, towards the
> end:
>
>
> http://www.slideshare.net/geosolutions/mapping-the-world-beyond-web-mercator-foss4g-2015?related=1
>
> Cheers
> Andrea
>
HI,
When you do a WMS GetFeatureInfo in geoserver, the query it builds is a bit
sub-optimal:
SELECT OSM_ID,NAME,TYPE,GEOM as GEOM FROM WWW_DATA.BAHNEN_21781 WHERE
(SDO_FILTER(GEOM, ?, '
mask=anyinteract querytype=WINDOW') = 'TRUE' OR SDO_FILTER(GEOM, ?,
'mask=anyinteract querytype=WINDOW') =
'TR
14 matches
Mail list logo
