Re: [Geotools-devel] Time to remove GDAL support from the OSX Github action?

2024-06-11 Thread Roar Brænden
Hi Torben, Impressive tweaking. I haven't looked into the troubles you're facing with the last build, but I've had problems using GDAL >3.7.1 in a Docker container. Best regards, Roar Brænden > 12. jun. 2024 kl. 05:05 skrev Torben Barsballe : > > I've made an

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-users] forwarding GEBCO WMS fails - help needed

2024-04-25 Thread Roar Brænden
> 24. apr. 2024 kl. 15:34 skrev Andrea Aime : > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 3:30 PM Roar Brænden <mailto:roar.brenden...@gmail.com>> wrote: > What I'm confused about is how the two classes should influence on what is > sent as Accept-header. Nothing in the code

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-users] forwarding GEBCO WMS fails - help needed

2024-04-24 Thread Roar Brænden
exception. What I'm confused about is how the two classes should influence on what is sent as Accept-header. Nothing in the code indicates something like that. Best regards, Roar Brænden ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.s

Re: [Geotools-devel] Deployment of Javadocs

2024-03-26 Thread Roar Brænden
Jody Garnett > > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 8:55 AM Roar Brænden <mailto:roar.brenden...@gmail.com>> wrote: > Hi, > > Recently I've been looking at Javadocs, and I see that there are no > -javadoc.jar at the Maven repository repo.osgeo.org <http://repo.osg

[Geotools-devel] Deployment of Javadocs

2024-03-26 Thread Roar Brænden
ore obvious to download it with Maven from a repository. Is there a reason why these aren't published to the repository when releasing a new project? Best regards, Roar Brænden ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourc

Re: [Geotools-devel] Time to remove GDAL support from the OSX Github action?

2024-01-25 Thread Roar Brænden
heir manual at present: > https://gdal.org/api/java/index.html <https://gdal.org/api/java/index.html> > -- > Jody Garnett > > > On Jan 24, 2024 at 11:23:57 PM, Roar Brænden <mailto:roar.brenden...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have some expe

Re: [Geotools-devel] Time to remove GDAL support from the OSX Github action?

2024-01-24 Thread Roar Brænden
orks either. The solution for me was to build the GDAL libraries from sources, an even then there are some settings and tweaks to make it run with GeoTools. So my recommendation is to drop it. Regards, Roar Brænden > 22. jan. 2024 kl. 20:05 skrev Jody Garnett : > > I can look at

[Geotools-devel] Test failures in gt-jdbc-h2gis

2024-01-24 Thread Roar Brænden
Hi, After being away from Geotools development for a while, I had some problem to run "mvn clean install -Dall". The failure was in gt-jdbc-h2gis and it was complaining about some h2 db files having wrong version in header. In GitHub I found a PR

Re: [Geotools-devel] Remove opengis: merge underway

2023-09-07 Thread Roar Brænden
Hi, I've gone through my portfolio of GeoTools examples, and this was a remarkable effort. I haven't found a single issue. Well done! Best regards, Roar Brænden > 6. sep. 2023 kl. 03:37 skrev Jody Garnett : > > Merge is complete, build server is chewing over the builds j

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 218: Control remote HTTP requests sent by GeoTools \ GeoServer

2023-03-23 Thread Roar Brænden
use. > > Generally speaking, I'd expect it to be handled in a similar way to the > LoggingHTTPClient. > > Cheers > Andrea > > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 8:49 PM Roar Brænden <mailto:roar.brenden...@gmail.com>> wrote: > Hi, > > This looks like

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 218: Control remote HTTP requests sent by GeoTools \ GeoServer

2023-03-22 Thread Roar Brænden
rtunity for future work simplifying the application. > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 12:49 PM Roar Brænden <mailto:roar.brenden...@gmail.com>> wrote: > Hi, > > This looks like something I've been thinking about. Would love to implement > such a solution. Too bad I&

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 218: Control remote HTTP requests sent by GeoTools \ GeoServer

2023-03-22 Thread Roar Brænden
t that will log a warning or throw an exception. How could that object get enough information to give the user good feedback on which store / layer / process the admin needs to change? I suppose that varies from case to case and would be for a later version. Best regards, Roar Brænden >

Re: [Geotools-devel] Coverage reprojection as a Process

2022-10-24 Thread Roar Brænden
Hi, Thanks for the answer. It's in conjunction with DEM I'm looking at it. I think it will need some more investigation, but then I know there's no reprojection within gt-process-raster at the moment. Roar Brænden > 24. okt. 2022 kl. 18:49 skrev Jody Garnett : >

[Geotools-devel] Coverage reprojection as a Process

2022-10-24 Thread Roar Brænden
a process based on the Resample operation? Thanks a lot. Best regards, Roar Brænden ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Re: [Geotools-devel] AttributeDescriptor reporting wrong type name

2022-05-27 Thread Roar Brænden
der(factory); builder.setName("location"); builder.setTypeName("gml:PointPropertyType"); builder.setBinding(Point.class); AttributeDescriptor attribute = builder.buildDescriptor(); Best regards, Roar Brænden > 27. mai 2022 kl. 03:33 skrev Jody Garnett : > > I reme

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal for the HTTPResponse interface

2022-05-27 Thread Roar Brænden
should be handled by the delegating http client. And I think they do. I will have another look at the examples, and also your suggestion with getResponseStream(boolean allowErrorResponse). Best regards, Roar Brænden > 27. mai 2022 kl. 04:32 skrev Jody Garnett : > > Thanks for the propos

[Geotools-devel] AttributeDescriptor reporting wrong type name

2022-05-25 Thread Roar Brænden
orward fixing this, or are people so used to this that they don't bother? Best regards, Roar Brænden ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

[Geotools-devel] Proposal for the HTTPResponse interface

2022-05-25 Thread Roar Brænden
reely visible. https://github.com/geotools/geotools/wiki/HTTPResponse-handling-error-responses <https://github.com/geotools/geotools/wiki/HTTPResponse-handling-error-responses> Could you please have a look, and maybe give some feedback? Best regards, R

Re: [Geotools-devel] WMTS projections

2022-02-02 Thread Roar Brænden
r even better how to prevent using a factory if it's on the class path. Best regards, Roar Brænden > 2. feb. 2022 kl. 10:05 skrev Andrea Aime : > > On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 9:44 AM Roar Brænden <mailto:roar.brenden...@gmail.com>> wrote: > Hi, > > Got it! > &g

Re: [Geotools-devel] WMTS projections

2022-02-02 Thread Roar Brænden
ority. Why is gt-epsg-hsql removed in the first round and not gt-epsg-wkt? Wouldn't it be preferable to loop through the list of all factories once, and instead move those respecting forceXY forward? Best regards, Roar Brænden > 31. jan. 2022 kl. 15:22 skrev Jody Garnett : > > I th

Re: [Geotools-devel] WMTS projections

2022-01-31 Thread Roar Brænden
oxes. If the latter. How do we do that? I've seen many approaches, but they doesn't seem to handle everything. Best regards, Roar Brænden > 30. jan. 2022 kl. 22:32 skrev Jody Garnett : > > First up thank you for the work, I spotted a couple documentation examples > tha

[Geotools-devel] WMTS projections

2022-01-26 Thread Roar Brænden
Hi, For the last year I've been working with the gt-wmts module. I've tried to clarify the responsibilties between WebMapTileServer and WMTSTileService. The first one building on OGC web service modules, and gimmick the WMTS standard. While the other one WMTSTileServer representing a single WMS

[Geotools-devel] More gt-tile-client clean up

2021-09-29 Thread Roar Brænden
projects/GEOT/issues/GEOT-6989 And a PR is delivered here: https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/3646 Best regards, Roar Brænden ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Re: [Geotools-devel] WFS ComplexFeature and object representation

2021-08-31 Thread Roar Brænden
e there is some bugs there, so I will make some tickets for those. Maybe I will do something about the documentation as well. Thanks for your time, Jody. Regards, Roar Brænden > 1. sep. 2021 kl. 00:21 skrev Jody Garnett : > > Sorry I do not have more time for this, there are a

Re: [Geotools-devel] WFS ComplexFeature and object representation

2021-08-31 Thread Roar Brænden
hrow new RuntimeException("There should've been a \"navn\" element."); } Any feedback would be welcome. Regards, Roar Brænden > 31. aug. 2021 kl. 17:35 skrev Jody Garnett : > > The use of complex features is mostly confined to the app-schema module

[Geotools-devel] WFS ComplexFeature and object representation

2021-08-31 Thread Roar Brænden
. It should be called kommunenavn, and AdministrativEnhetNavnType is superfluous. Do anyone have an idea why it's done like it is today, or do anyone have an opinion about my changes? It would be nice to hear about them. How could I go forward to implement these changes? Best regards, R

Re: [Geotools-devel] Interest in null checks?

2021-06-13 Thread Roar Brænden
at would be the best candidate to look into. At first glance I couldn't figure out how to do to though. If anyone could give me some directions, I wouldn't mind having a deeper look at it. Best regards, Roar Brænden > 12. jun. 2021 kl. 19:04 skrev Andrea Aime : > > Hi, >

Re: [Geotools-devel] PMD complexity checks... "cognitive complexity"

2021-06-12 Thread Roar Brænden
Good points, but I have spent a lot of time figuring out NullPointerException within Geotools. Regards, Roar Brænden lør. 12. jun. 2021 kl. 13:29 skrev Andrea Aime : > On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 12:31 PM Roar Brænden > wrote: > >> Hi, >> Looking at that last method, I count

Re: [Geotools-devel] PMD complexity checks... "cognitive complexity"

2021-06-12 Thread Roar Brænden
Hi, Looking at that last method, I counted seven «return null». Is there a PMD for replacing «return null» with Optional? Ian, Java has also changed a bit the last 20 years. Best regards, Roar Brænden lør. 12. jun. 2021 kl. 12:02 skrev Ian Turton : > > > On Sat, 12 Jun 2021 at 10:5

[Geotools-devel] WMTS cascading with versatile url handling

2021-05-21 Thread Roar Brænden
Hi, Recently I got aware of a bug with the WMTS cascading. The bug appears whenever a url set for wmts have it's own query parameters. Those would be omitted. This is solved by this PR: https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/3520 I see there

[Geotools-devel] WMTS online tests

2021-02-01 Thread Roar Brænden
nvironments, so I haven't manage to run the tests. Another thing I had to do was to make an exclusion for xercesImpl from mockrunner-jdbc. It references an old version that in some way got into my class path. Best regards, Roar Brænden ___ GeoTo

Re: [Geotools-devel] Jira open tickets cleanup (in particular, tickets assigned to you)

2021-01-15 Thread Roar Brænden
issue - When I see that I've misunderstood. - Self-assign - Set myself as assignee. Regards, Roar Brænden fre. 15. jan. 2021 kl. 10:35 skrev Andrea Aime : > Hi, > with the next release incoming, can I ask everyone that can be assigned to > tickets in Jira, to > check if they have

Re: [Geotools-devel] ArcSDE module: how about removing it?

2021-01-15 Thread Roar Brænden
Hi, ArcSDE have been deprecated from ESRI. I belive they stopped supporting the server version in 2012-13. Client side it has taken a bit longer, and there have been a piecewise deprecation. I do belive that the last versions of ArcMap doesn't have any support for ArcSDE. Regards, Roar Br

Re: [Geotools-devel] gt-http and gt-http-components proposal

2021-01-12 Thread Roar Brænden
with knowledge to gt-wfs-ng takes a look at the code. Regards, Roar Brænden > 12. jan. 2021 kl. 09:56 skrev Andrea Aime : > > Hi all, > Roar applied the feedback received so far. Wondering if the proposal needs > any update as a consequence? (does not look like, but want to be sure)

Re: [Geotools-devel] gt-http and gt-http-components proposal

2021-01-07 Thread Roar Brænden
ols/http/HTTPResponse.java:[34,60] org.geotools.data.ows.HTTPResponse in org.geotools.data.ows has been deprecated And here is a link to the specific run: https://github.com/geotools/geotools/runs/1662859692?check_suite_focus=true <https://github.com/geotools/geotools/runs/1662859692?check_suite_focus=true

Re: [Geotools-devel] gt-http and gt-http-components proposal

2021-01-05 Thread Roar Brænden
ponse LoggingHTTPClient SimpleHttpClient Regards, Roar Brænden > 5. jan. 2021 kl. 21:55 skrev Jody Garnett : > > Perfect, the proposal is starting to collect votes. > > I had one thing to discuss, use of CommonFactoryFinder? It would be great if > use of this module can be in

Re: [Geotools-devel] gt-http and gt-http-components proposal

2021-01-04 Thread Roar Brænden
Thanks, I think you've nailed the main goal by the proposal. I did some change to the code example though. It would have been great to land this PR, and work with some of the bugs regarding HTTPClient. Regards, Roar Brænden > 4. jan. 2021 kl. 21:49 skrev Jody Garnett : > >

[Geotools-devel] Failing Github Checks

2020-12-30 Thread Roar Brænden
Hi, When committing to an existing PR some of the checks fails with messages like this one: Error: 1,078 [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project gt-imagemosaic: Could not resolve dependencies for project org.geotools:gt-imagemosaic:jar:25-SNAPSHOT: Failed to collect dependencies at commons-

Re: [Geotools-devel] gt-http and gt-http-components proposal

2020-12-23 Thread Roar Brænden
ing what is your feeling between "gt-http" and "gt-web"? > -- I would prefer to use http, as web is too wide. For the moment I have these two projects in the file structure: library / http (gt-http) plugin / http-commons (gt-http-commons) Regards Roar Brænden __

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoServer/GeoTools PMC Meeting at 17:30 UTC tomorrow

2020-12-22 Thread Roar Brænden
> 22. des. 2020 kl. 11:23 skrev Andrea Aime : > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 9:05 AM Roar Brænden <mailto:roar.brenden...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Another point has been the usage of commons-httpclient. This is an old, > unmaintained library that today are used by gt-

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoServer/GeoTools PMC Meeting at 17:30 UTC tomorrow

2020-12-22 Thread Roar Brænden
ill be introduced in a new Jira / PR. The timing of this meeting isn't very practical for me, so I'm afraid I can't attain, but I'm open for any input whether it's at the maillist, JIRA or Github. Regards, Roar Brænden > 21. des. 2020 kl. 18:44 skrev Torben Barsballe

[Geotools-devel] Error in QA task unrelated to changed project

2020-12-20 Thread Roar Brænden
Link to the PR on Github is here: https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/3256/checks?check_run_id=1580791377 <https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/3256/checks?check_run_id=1580791377> Any tip on where to look or how to solve this issue. Is it a bug in GeoTools or in Fmt-Maven-Plugin?

Re: [Geotools-devel] New library gt-http : Special notice for gt-wps / gt-mbstyle / gt-mongodb

2020-12-10 Thread Roar Brænden
ething new in gt-http. I do want to contribute my work on HttpClientFactory. Instead of looking at Apache HttpComponents, which are the successor to Commons HttpClient, I would like to look at the Http Client within JDK 11. Regards, Roar Brænden > 10. des. 2020 kl. 13:29 skrev Mark Prins :

[Geotools-devel] New library gt-http : Special notice for gt-wps / gt-mbstyle / gt-mongodb

2020-12-09 Thread Roar Brænden
cy, I could turn it into a plugin. Any opinions? Best regards, Roar Brænden https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/jira/software/c/projects/GEOT/issues/GEOT-6755 <https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/jira/software/c/projects/GEOT/issues/GEOT-6755> https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/3

[Geotools-devel] Wrong e-mail address in pom.xml

2020-12-08 Thread Roar Brænden
Hi, I was asked to contact the maintainers of certain libraries of Geotools. When doing so I discovered one e-mail address being out of use (gda...@refractions.net ). How should that be reported? As an issue in Jira? Another question that arose when looking at th

Re: [Geotools-devel] [GEOT-6727] WFS MultithreadedHttpClient must not ignore nonProxyHosts

2020-11-09 Thread Roar Brænden
forward? Best regards, Roar Brænden > 29. okt. 2020 kl. 14:29 skrev Andrea Aime : > > Hi Andreas, > this is just my personal opinion, others might want to chime in. > Since MultithreadedHttpClient depends on Commons HTTPclient > I would suggest avoiding gt-main. > >

[Geotools-devel] CoverageCrop color for NoData is wrong

2020-02-03 Thread Roar Brænden
hould make sure that the Source coverage is of the type ARGB, and that I specify a color for destnodata parameter. Is this the right approach. Could this be part of the documentation for the processor? Cheers, Roar Brænden ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing lis