Re: [Geotools-devel] Elasticsearch community module

2020-02-02 Thread sjudeng
so. The document would > not be a perfect fit but you could fill it out as an individual (not an > organization), list “not applicable” for employees as nobody is working on > your behalf, and then name the software component being donated. > — > Jody > > On Sat, Jan 25, 20

Re: [Geotools-devel] Elasticsearch community module

2020-01-25 Thread sjudeng
#x27;s how we'll be able to move forward on the PR without getting individual/corporate CLAs signed for each of them? Once it's merged what if a new contributor wanted to contribute to the module but also couldn't sign the CLA? On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 7:18 AM sjudeng wrote: > Hi Jod

Re: [Geotools-devel] Elasticsearch community module

2020-01-24 Thread sjudeng
CLA, > rather than to just the sentence on copyright ... > > If you want to pursue this with NGA management we can do so via Open > Source Geospatial Foundation, they have been stuck on this for *years*. > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 7:03 PM sjudeng wrote: > >> Jody and And

Re: [Geotools-devel] Elasticsearch community module

2020-01-22 Thread sjudeng
Tools-side) and GPL (GeoServer-side), is the inclusion of the associated source code not similar to the inclusion of similarly licensed third-party dependency libraries, which include contributors that haven't signed the OSGeo CLA? On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 8:18 PM sjudeng wrote: > Hello

Re: [Geotools-devel] Elasticsearch community module

2020-01-13 Thread sjudeng
at 1:41 AM Andrea Aime wrote: > On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 3:11 AM sjudeng wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> If there is interest I'd like to try again to get ElasticGeo contributed >> to GeoTools/GeoServer as a community module. >> > > I don't remember

[Geotools-devel] Elasticsearch community module

2020-01-12 Thread sjudeng
Would everyone need to have a CLA on file for the contribution to be successful? https://github.com/sjudeng/geotools/tree/elasticsearch https://github.com/sjudeng/geoserver/tree/elasticsearch ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforg

Re: [Geotools-devel] Public domain contribution

2017-06-13 Thread sjudeng
That's right. Going this route simplified the project configuration since separate jars are no longer needed for different ES versions (e.g. same modules/binaries work with both ES2 and ES5). Also of course it's always good when plugin install instructions don't involve removing core GeoServer jars

Re: [Geotools-devel] Public domain contribution

2017-06-13 Thread sjudeng
com/ngageoint/elasticgeo/blob/df1234c3d56f43a0cdd46c98545798a92a6c0fd6/pom.xml#L39> ). On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 4:42 PM, sjudeng wrote: > Jody, > > Thanks for your quick response. It does sound like a pain. I'll look into > the CLA. > > On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Jody Garne

Re: [Geotools-devel] Public domain contribution

2017-06-02 Thread sjudeng
gt;> >> So this is really not a lot of fun; do you have a legal requirement to >> use the public domain? Or are you just looking for an alternative to your >> employer signing a code contribution agreement? >> >> >> -- >> Jody Garnett >> >> On

[Geotools-devel] Public domain contribution

2017-06-02 Thread sjudeng
Is it possible to make a public domain contribution to GeoTools and GeoServer without a CLA? I'm interested in contributing an Elasticsearch plugin (https://github.com/ngageoint/elasticgeo), which is licensed based on the GeoTools (LGPL) and GeoServer (GPL) components. My contributions to the plugi