So I have reviewed https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/166
And it looks good, I have provided some feedback as I went through the code -
more the kind of stuff you would need to do to bring it up to supported status.
Any word on your paperwork?
--
Jody Garnett
On Tuesday, 19 March
Sounds good, the pull-request provides a good venue for review/feedback.
--
Jody Garnett
On Tuesday, 19 March 2013 at 4:49 PM, Yancy Matherne wrote:
> Thanks Jody.
>
> I have passed the contribution agreement up the ladder. Hopefully the bosses
> can take care of that quickly. Should I
Thanks Jody.
I have passed the contribution agreement up the ladder. Hopefully the bosses
can take care of that quickly. Should I get a pull request going now so people
can start reviewing it?
Thanks,
Yancy Matherne
Software Developer
Geocent, LLC
111 Veterans Blvd., Suite 1600
Metairie, LA
Other than that I will take that as a request for commit access for a new
unsupported module[1]. With justin's support you have a +1 that the module is a
good idea :)
We do ask that module maintainers sign (even for unsupported modules) sign a
code contribution license (so the OSGeo Foundatio
Hi All,
This is a continuation of a thread started in Geoserver-Devel list. I'm adding
the Geotools-Devel list since it was suggested that my code changes are be
suited in the GeoTools repository.
A little background for the new list of people. We are working on a NetCDF
coverage store plugin
