Hello Daniele,
In the meantime, I have gotten feedback from the netcdf-java community
that it is up to the user to put the aggregated files in the proper order.
That still leaves us with the lack of support for decreasing order in
geotools. I made a patch and added it to my aggregation suppor
Hi Daniele,
Did you have any more comments on my last email? Would it make sense to
convert all Strings to Dates, and sort them , in order to find the
minimum and maximum? Isn't that a bit expensive (and repetitive) for
those two methods (you'd be doing it twice while doing it once provides
Yeah, still that implies that the order of the files specified in the
aggregation must be the same as the order of values for the aggregated
dimension inside those files themselves. I can find no such
specification though, but maybe I am missing it. It seems that in the
examples on
http://www.
Hi Niels,
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Niels Charlier wrote:
> On 23-09-16 17:03, Daniele Romagnoli wrote:
>
> I think that once the aggregation is in place, times can be in any order
> as you reported, so I think it's time to revisit the timeVariable min/max
> computation (not sure there a
On 23-09-16 17:03, Daniele Romagnoli wrote:
I think that once the aggregation is in place, times can be in any
order as you reported, so I think it's time to revisit the
timeVariable min/max computation (not sure there are other methods
around based on that supposition. I didn't check it yet).
Hi Niels,
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Niels Charlier wrote:
> HI Daniele,
>
> Thank you for your quick response.
>
> Two remarks though
>
> - I do seem to get from your explanation that it can also be decreasing
> rather than increasing, which means it should at least be possible to work
>
HI Daniele,
Thank you for your quick response.
Two remarks though
- I do seem to get from your explanation that it can also be decreasing
rather than increasing, which means it should at least be possible to
work the other way around, which was the case here. There are only two
files, the la
Hi Niels,
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Niels Charlier wrote:
> Simone, Daniele,
>
> Do you have an opinion on point (3) of this email?
>
> It seems that one of you have written the code that expects a
> chronological order of listed aggregation files.
>
> The logic is in https://github.com/
Simone, Daniele,
Do you have an opinion on point (3) of this email?
It seems that one of you have written the code that expects a
chronological order of listed aggregation files.
The logic is in
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/blob/master/modules/plugin/coverage-multidim/netcdf/src/main
Ben, Sean,
I am also including the geotools list in the discussion, because it
regards both libraries.
I got the aggregation file to work. Apart from some obvious bug fixes
and additions to support the "runtime" dimension in geotools, I had to
make a few changes to the xml file.
What is sti
10 matches
Mail list logo