On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 2:43 AM, Justin Deoliveira <
jdeol...@boundlessgeo.com> wrote:
> Hey Andrea, I figured you might want this in the 10.5 release and I would
> like to go ahead with building it so I took the liberty of backporting
> this. Hope that is ok.
>
Ah yes, thank you, very thoughtful
Hey Andrea, I figured you might want this in the 10.5 release and I would
like to go ahead with building it so I took the liberty of backporting
this. Hope that is ok.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies <
ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au> wrote:
> +1. Such a tiny change, so much test
+1. Such a tiny change, so much test coverage. Please go ahead.
Kind regards,
Ben.
On 25/02/14 19:48, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Hi,
> I've just completed a patch provided by a GeoTools user to support
> the citext postgresql extension data type
> (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/citext.html)
I have no objection.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 4:48 AM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> Hi,
> I've just completed a patch provided by a GeoTools user to support
> the citext postgresql extension data type (
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/citext.html)
> by adding a online test for it:
>
> https:/
Hi,
I've just completed a patch provided by a GeoTools user to support
the citext postgresql extension data type (
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/citext.html)
by adding a online test for it:
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/commit/0d3fbe332c62530090b3798b50b5c023d7f4fe68
The patch p
