Vincent Heurteaux wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Le 25 janv. 07 à 12:30, Vincent Schut a écrit :
>
>
>> BTW I do install JAI &co myself from cvs, not from portage (don't even
>> know if it's there).
>>
> There is a JAI ebuild in portage, but you have to define a
> PORTDIR_OVERLAY and to create an al
Hello,
Le 25 janv. 07 à 12:30, Vincent Schut a écrit :
> BTW I do install JAI &co myself from cvs, not from portage (don't even
> know if it's there).
There is a JAI ebuild in portage, but you have to define a
PORTDIR_OVERLAY and to create an alternative ebuild with a greater
version number,
Andrea Aime wrote:
> Vincent Schut ha scritto:
>
>> Cédric Briançon wrote:
>>
>>> Vincent Schut a écrit :
>>>
>>>
FYI: I just did my regular rebuild of gt 2.3.x branch, and everything
built fine.
This is with sun-jdk 1.5.0_10.
>>> It's
Ciao Andrea,
Ah, another one having issues with Java on Gentoo.
Have you installed your jdk from portage? Justin was having problems
with that jdk too and solved it by installing an official jdk from
Sun.
We've experienced problems in the past with Blackdown jdk wich is the
default one on
Vincent Schut ha scritto:
> Cédric Briançon wrote:
>> Vincent Schut a écrit :
>>
>>> FYI: I just did my regular rebuild of gt 2.3.x branch, and everything
>>> built fine.
>>> This is with sun-jdk 1.5.0_10.
>>>
>>>
>> It's weird, I haven't succeeded in compiling the branch 2.3.x with jdk
>
Vincent Schut a écrit :
> Cédric Briançon wrote:
>> Vincent Schut a écrit :
>>
>>> FYI: I just did my regular rebuild of gt 2.3.x branch, and
>>> everything built fine.
>>> This is with sun-jdk 1.5.0_10.
>>>
>>>
>> It's weird, I haven't succeeded in compiling the branch 2.3.x with
>> jdk 1
Cédric Briançon wrote:
> Vincent Schut a écrit :
>
>> FYI: I just did my regular rebuild of gt 2.3.x branch, and everything
>> built fine.
>> This is with sun-jdk 1.5.0_10.
>>
>>
> It's weird, I haven't succeeded in compiling the branch 2.3.x with jdk
> 1.5.0_09...
> I've installed a jdk
Vincent Schut a écrit :
> FYI: I just did my regular rebuild of gt 2.3.x branch, and everything
> built fine.
> This is with sun-jdk 1.5.0_10.
>
It's weird, I haven't succeeded in compiling the branch 2.3.x with jdk
1.5.0_09...
I've installed a jdk 1.4.2_13 and it works ...
Thanks for this advic
> * There is also a mysterious test failure in main (I don't remember
> which one exactly). This test pass fine with Java 4 and 5 but fails
> with Java 6. I have not investigated this issue further.
>
Oh, yes, I have a fix for that too, there were a number of them. They
stem from the fact that
Geotools do not compiles with Java 6. I already reported this issue a
few weeks ago. There is two problems:
* Introduction of new methods in javax.sql.DataSource. This is not the
first time that Sun introduces new methods in JDBC interfaces. It does
happen at every new JDBC release. Lets remin
James Macgill ha scritto:
> So,
>
> I hit errors like this the other night when trying to build geotools
> for the first time in ages.
>
> For me it was the introduction of Wrapper in 1.6 (which uses
> generics).
Indeed you're right, it does not compile with java 6.
Hey, this means Sun decided
Same here.
Simone.
On 1/23/07, Vincent Schut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FYI: I just did my regular rebuild of gt 2.3.x branch, and everything
> built fine.
> This is with sun-jdk 1.5.0_10.
>
> Cheers,
> Vincent.
>
> James Macgill wrote:
> > So,
> >
> > I hit errors like this the other night whe
FYI: I just did my regular rebuild of gt 2.3.x branch, and everything
built fine.
This is with sun-jdk 1.5.0_10.
Cheers,
Vincent.
James Macgill wrote:
> So,
>
> I hit errors like this the other night when trying to build geotools
> for the first time in ages.
>
> For me it was the introduction o
So,
I hit errors like this the other night when trying to build geotools
for the first time in ages.
For me it was the introduction of Wrapper in 1.6 (which uses
generics). Building against a 1.4 classes archive is one option, the
other is to add the methods in the wrapper interface but using Ob
This is quite strange man, I just did a full mvn clean install and
everything worked for me here.
Does it work for you andrea?
Simone.
On 1/23/07, Cédric Briançon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrea Aime a écrit :
> > Cédric Briançon ha scritto:
> >> Simone Giannecchini a écrit :
> >
> C:\pr
Andrea Aime a écrit :
> Cédric Briançon ha scritto:
>> Simone Giannecchini a écrit :
>
C:\projets\geotools\branches\2.3.x\module\referencing\src\org\geotools\referenci
ng\factory\epsg\SimpleDataSource.java:[99,7]
org.geotools.referencing.factory.ep
sg.SimpleDataSourc
Cédric Briançon ha scritto:
> Simone Giannecchini a écrit :
>>> C:\projets\geotools\branches\2.3.x\module\referencing\src\org\geotools\referenci
>>>
>>>
>>> ng\factory\epsg\SimpleDataSource.java:[99,7]
>>> org.geotools.referencing.factory.ep
>>> sg.SimpleDataSource is not abstract and does not o
Simone Giannecchini a écrit :
> Ciao Cedric,
> did you update the whole tree of gt 2.3.x?
>
> Simone.
>
Yes, I have updated all my gt2.3.x directory. When I launch "mvn
install" from the root directory of branches/2.3.x, I fail on the
referencing module, so I have tried to build only the coverage
Ciao Cedric,
did you update the whole tree of gt 2.3.x?
Simone.
On 1/23/07, Cédric Briançon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello I've just updated my version of Geotools2.3.1, and the compilation
> breaks on coverage and referencing modules (the same for maven with
> jdk1.6 and 1.5.0_09). Here is t
Hello I've just updated my version of Geotools2.3.1, and the compilation
breaks on coverage and referencing modules (the same for maven with
jdk1.6 and 1.5.0_09). Here is the stack traces :
C:\projets\geotools\branches\2.3.x\module\coverage>mvn install
[INFO] Scanning for projects...
[INFO]
---
20 matches
Mail list logo
