On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Andrea Aime andrea.a...@geo-solutions.itwrote:
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Justin Deoliveira jdeol...@opengeo.orgwrote:
Not sure what is actionalble out of this thread but would it help to
update all of our internal schemas to the latest schemas that
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 11:45 PM, Jody Garnett jody.garn...@gmail.comwrote:
Andrea do we have any chance of doing what the OGC wants? Ie cutting cold
turkey over to the new/official xlink schema (even for all the old
schemas?).
I understand they have retroactively applied the official xlink
On 04/12/12 23:41, Andrea Aime wrote:
However, all the schemas in the main gml 3.2 are also different in some way,
thought I've not verified to what extent)
When Justin created the original GML 3.2.1 bindings, he modified or
removed several types in xsd files to break cyclic type definitions
Not sure what is actionalble out of this thread but would it help to update
all of our internal schemas to the latest schemas that contain all the
xlink fixes? Especially the gml 3.2 schema which seems to have factored out
all the iso schema (gcd, gmx, etc...)
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 2:25 AM, Ben
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Justin Deoliveira jdeol...@opengeo.orgwrote:
Not sure what is actionalble out of this thread but would it help to
update all of our internal schemas to the latest schemas that contain all
the xlink fixes? Especially the gml 3.2 schema which seems to have
Hi,
I was trying to setup the code so that it can validate WCS 2.0 documents,
but
right now it seems mission impossible due to OGC's handywork with Xlink
and deep GML 3.2.1 changes...
Basically, the validation of a WCS 2.0 caps document fails because WCS
refers GML 3.2.1 via the gmlcov schemas,
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Andrea Aime
andrea.a...@geo-solutions.itwrote:
Indeed, GML 3.2.1 seems a lot simpler than the GML 3.2 we have in the
classpath.
Compare this:
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Andrea Aime
andrea.a...@geo-solutions.itwrote:
Hi,
I was trying to setup the code so that it can validate WCS 2.0 documents,
but
right now it seems mission impossible due to OGC's handywork with Xlink
and deep GML 3.2.1 changes...
Basically, the validation
Andrea do we have any chance of doing what the OGC wants? Ie cutting cold
turkey over to the new/official xlink schema (even for all the old schemas?).
I understand they have retroactively applied the official xlink schema to all
the old standards… does that have a chance of working for us?
