I would find the site+reports valuable - building on a weekend would
be fine (the code coverage report and javadocs both take a long time).
Thanks for all the hard work exploring the issue andrea; very good
detective work.
Jody
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 3:24 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Hi,
> I've be
+1 for the reports.
Especially the cobertura reports are useful for examining the test coverage.
Concerning the build resources. I have to find a solution for the ibm
hudson, perhaps we can run the "mvn site" on the ibm hudson box.
Andrea Aime writes:
> Hi,
> I've been playing a bit try
Hi,
I've been playing a bit trying to generate the maven
site, which was reported as non buildable, and non
fixable too.
In fact, at the moment, the generation fails solid, or to be
more precise, enters an infinite loop.
I tracked that down to an interaction between
javadoc aggregation and the si
