Hi,
I have updated the page about the unsupported/temporal module:
modules/unsupported/temporal none sg: daniele
dr: ok.
Assign it to me
Cheers,
Daniele
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Michael Bedward wrote:
Hi Simone,
2009/5/13 Simone Giannecchini wrote:
> modules/library/coverage none sg: I can take it, maybe mb wants to
> help out
I am working with the coverage classes quite a lot in my own projects
and (soon I hope) on the 2.6.x_jaitools branch. So, yes, I'd be happy
to help you with
Ciao all,
just finished editing the document. Here is a summary:
Module Current/Proposed maintaner Notes, suggested action
modules/library/api jgarnettsg: am I the only one who thinks that
this should kill geoapi?
modules/library/coverage nonesg: I can take it, mayb
RE: modules/unsupported/caching
I was working on this a while back and would be happy to try to maintain
this module for now. I don't have any plans to add to it (other than
maybe some more test cases); but I'm happy to look into bugs and attempt
to keep it up to date.
Emily
Andrea Aime wrot
Rob Atkinson ha scritto:
> re geometryless module - it is in use by people using the 1.6 complex
> schema support. I dont plan to do anything else with it: I hope to
> retire it completely by using the app-schema support for complex data
> types and the ability to handle SQL dialects in the jdbc-ng
Nice work. I made a few minor comments for xml-po, some of the demo
modules, postgis module, and the emf demo modules.
I am also +1 on all the ones you flagged as remove. I am looking forward
to a smaller code base, it is long overdue.
-Justin
Andrea Aime wrote:
> Hi all,
> I've created a wiki
re geometryless module - it is in use by people using the 1.6 complex
schema support. I dont plan to do anything else with it: I hope to
retire it completely by using the app-schema support for complex data
types and the ability to handle SQL dialects in the jdbc-ng stack. It
has the status of a le
Christian Müller ha scritto:
> Andrea, should we edit the wiki page directly ?.
I guess so. Just add a comment with your initials in the modules
you have an opinion for.
> As an example, I agreed with David Adler on the new db2-ng module, so
> there will certainly be not further development and
Andrea, should we edit the wiki page directly ?.
As an example, I agreed with David Adler on the new db2-ng module, so there
will certainly be not further development and no support for the old db2
module. We can and should remove it or move it for some time to unsupported
and remove it in th
Hi all,
I've created a wiki page to organise the module
maintainerships reassignment and cleanup, here is it:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Modules+cleanup
Ideally, I would like to find a maintainer for each module,
and at least an expression of interest for unsupported
modules by some
10 matches
Mail list logo
