I see; since I have not applied any of the changes from trunk this does not
apply for what I am doing right now.
Thanks for the explanation.
Jody
On 27/04/2010, at 11:27 PM, Michael Bedward wrote:
>> What does reintegrate do?
>>
>
> From the svn book...
>
> Notice our use of the --reintegra
> What does reintegrate do?
>
>From the svn book...
Notice our use of the --reintegrate option this time around. The
option is critical for reintegrating changes from a branch back into
its original line of development—don't forget it! It's needed because
this sort of “merge back” is a different
On 27/04/2010, at 11:11 PM, Michael Bedward wrote:
> Hi Jody,
>
>> Just noticed you updated the example apps to use SimpleFeatureIterator - did
>> you learn anything during updating of note?
>
> They were just trivial changes and the apps worked afterwards :)
>
>> I did not do any search and re
Hi Jody,
> Just noticed you updated the example apps to use SimpleFeatureIterator - did
> you learn anything during updating of note?
They were just trivial changes and the apps worked afterwards :)
> I did not do any search and replace for these ones; do you think it is worth
> it?
You mean i
Thanks Micheal;
Just noticed you updated the example apps to use SimpleFeatureIterator - did
you learn anything during updating of note?
I did not do any search and replace for these ones; do you think it is worth it?
I am going through the motions locally to apply the patch to trunk; the comman
Hi Jody,
The new code builds for me without any problems.
Michael
--
___
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/li
I have gone ahead and done that on the branch; no surprises. Will run tests now
and then commit.
Other then that I would like to go ahead on this proposal; it should be as
simple as an svn merge.
Jody
On 27/04/2010, at 2:32 PM, Michael Bedward wrote:
> +1
>
> I've tested the code on the simp
You're a champion :-)
On 27 April 2010 14:53, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Well if that will kick it over the line I will try and add it tonight.
> Jody
>
--
___
Geotools-devel mailin
Well if that will kick it over the line I will try and add it tonight.
Jody
On 27/04/2010, at 2:32 PM, Michael Bedward wrote:
> +1
>
> I've tested the code on the simple-features branch and had no problems
> so far (osx, java 5)
>
> As per another thread, it would be great to also have SimpleFe
+1
I've tested the code on the simple-features branch and had no problems
so far (osx, java 5)
As per another thread, it would be great to also have SimpleFeatureIterator.
Michael
--
On 27/04/10 01:05, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Jody Garnett ha scritto:
>>> As stated before I like the direction this is going, just worried a
>>> bit about the timing and the fact this would make porting patches
>>> over from 2.6.x to trunk (or vice versa) harder for a few months
>>> (until we release 2
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
>> As stated before I like the direction this is going, just worried a
>> bit about the timing and the fact this would make porting patches
>> over from 2.6.x to trunk (or vice versa) harder for a few months
>> (until we release 2.7.0)
>
>
> So is that worry enough for
On 26/04/2010, at 7:11 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> This hits another thing I've been hating quite a bit working on GSS,
> having to either sprinkle generics all around turning the code into
> an unreadable soup or bear up with Eclipse
> complaints about the code not having the generics.
I have been
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> I have updated the proposal in a few spots as per questions on IRC:
> - http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Clean+up+Generics+from+DataStore
This hits another thing I've been hating quite a bit working on GSS,
having to either sprinkle generics all around turning t
I have updated the proposal in a few spots as per questions on IRC:
- http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Clean+up+Generics+from+DataStore
Discussion has already started (see SimpleFeatureSource proposal ready email).
Jody--
15 matches
Mail list logo
