I have gone ahead and done that on the branch; no surprises. Will run tests now
and then commit.
Other then that I would like to go ahead on this proposal; it should be as
simple as an svn merge.
Jody
On 27/04/2010, at 2:32 PM, Michael Bedward wrote:
+1
I've tested the code on the
Hi Jody,
The new code builds for me without any problems.
Michael
--
___
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Thanks Micheal;
Just noticed you updated the example apps to use SimpleFeatureIterator - did
you learn anything during updating of note?
I did not do any search and replace for these ones; do you think it is worth it?
I am going through the motions locally to apply the patch to trunk; the
Hi Jody,
Just noticed you updated the example apps to use SimpleFeatureIterator - did
you learn anything during updating of note?
They were just trivial changes and the apps worked afterwards :)
I did not do any search and replace for these ones; do you think it is worth
it?
You mean in
On 27/04/2010, at 11:11 PM, Michael Bedward wrote:
Hi Jody,
Just noticed you updated the example apps to use SimpleFeatureIterator - did
you learn anything during updating of note?
They were just trivial changes and the apps worked afterwards :)
I did not do any search and replace for
What does reintegrate do?
From the svn book...
Notice our use of the --reintegrate option this time around. The
option is critical for reintegrating changes from a branch back into
its original line of development—don't forget it! It's needed because
this sort of “merge back” is a different
I see; since I have not applied any of the changes from trunk this does not
apply for what I am doing right now.
Thanks for the explanation.
Jody
On 27/04/2010, at 11:27 PM, Michael Bedward wrote:
What does reintegrate do?
From the svn book...
Notice our use of the --reintegrate
I have updated the proposal in a few spots as per questions on IRC:
- http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Clean+up+Generics+from+DataStore
Discussion has already started (see SimpleFeatureSource proposal ready email).
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
I have updated the proposal in a few spots as per questions on IRC:
- http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Clean+up+Generics+from+DataStore
This hits another thing I've been hating quite a bit working on GSS,
having to either sprinkle generics all around turning
On 26/04/2010, at 7:11 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
This hits another thing I've been hating quite a bit working on GSS,
having to either sprinkle generics all around turning the code into
an unreadable soup or bear up with Eclipse
complaints about the code not having the generics.
I have been
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
As stated before I like the direction this is going, just worried a
bit about the timing and the fact this would make porting patches
over from 2.6.x to trunk (or vice versa) harder for a few months
(until we release 2.7.0)
So is that worry enough for a +0? Or
On 27/04/10 01:05, Andrea Aime wrote:
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
As stated before I like the direction this is going, just worried a
bit about the timing and the fact this would make porting patches
over from 2.6.x to trunk (or vice versa) harder for a few months
(until we release 2.7.0)
So
+1
I've tested the code on the simple-features branch and had no problems
so far (osx, java 5)
As per another thread, it would be great to also have SimpleFeatureIterator.
Michael
--
Well if that will kick it over the line I will try and add it tonight.
Jody
On 27/04/2010, at 2:32 PM, Michael Bedward wrote:
+1
I've tested the code on the simple-features branch and had no problems
so far (osx, java 5)
As per another thread, it would be great to also have
You're a champion :-)
On 27 April 2010 14:53, Jody Garnett jody.garn...@gmail.com wrote:
Well if that will kick it over the line I will try and add it tonight.
Jody
--
___
15 matches
Mail list logo
