Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: documentation

2010-05-31 Thread Ian Turton
+1 for me Ian -- Ian Turton -- ___ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: documentation

2010-05-31 Thread Simone Giannecchini
+1 Simone. --- Ing. Simone Giannecchini GeoSolutions S.A.S. Founder - Software Engineer Via Carignoni 51 55041 Camaiore (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584983027 fax: +39 0584983027 mob:+39 333 8128928 http://www.geo-solutions.it

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: documentation

2010-05-30 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: As per discussion I did up a proposal with the plan. http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Sphinx+Documentation+Process +1 for me. This practice works very well in GeoServer. GeoTools is a larger and longer established project, and in my opinion, usually

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: documentation

2010-05-29 Thread Andrea Aime
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: As per discussion I did up a proposal with the plan. http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Sphinx+Documentation+Process +1 Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers.

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: documentation (was: A plan for docs)

2010-05-28 Thread christian . mueller
+1. Does somebody know a tool for converting wiki content into a sphinx format. The transformation has not to be perfect, but it would be a nice starting point for human review / corrections. Quoting Justin Deoliveira jdeol...@opengeo.org: As per discussion I did up a proposal with the

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: documentation

2010-05-28 Thread Andrea Aime
christian.muel...@nvoe.at ha scritto: +1. Does somebody know a tool for converting wiki content into a sphinx format. The transformation has not to be perfect, but it would be a nice starting point for human review / corrections. I did look for one but unfortunately could not fine any.

[Geotools-devel] Proposal: documentation (was: A plan for docs)

2010-05-27 Thread Justin Deoliveira
As per discussion I did up a proposal with the plan. http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Sphinx+Documentation+Process -Justin On 10-05-25 5:28 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: Comments inline; but yes we all agree about the direction. Where we are stuck is on some of the details. On

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: documentation

2010-05-27 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Patch attached to the issue. If there are no objections I will apply the patch and continue on with setting up the build server. On 10-05-27 5:50 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: As per discussion I did up a proposal with the plan.

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: documentation

2010-05-27 Thread Jody Garnett
+1 from me (added to the page). Talking on IRC it appears justin has also updated the template used for the docs as distinct from the main website template. Jody On 28/05/2010, at 12:11 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: Patch attached to the issue. If there are no objections I will apply the

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: documentation

2010-05-27 Thread Michael Bedward
+1 from me too. Thanks very much for doing this Justin, and thanks Jody for suggesting it. It's great to see the docs getting organized. Just to be clear - the docs structure and Hudson build is being set up in both trunk and branches 2.6.x - yes ? Michael