xml.
The AppSchema configuration defines how it is mapped to complex
types using xpaths.
Russell Petty
Justin Deoliveira jdeol...@opengeo.org
27/06/2009 01:54 AM
To
russell.pe...@dpi.vic.gov.au
cc
geotools dev geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject
Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposed new
+0 from me once again
Michael
--
___
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
.
Russell Petty
Justin Deoliveira jdeol...@opengeo.org
27/06/2009 01:54 AM
To
russell.pe...@dpi.vic.gov.au
cc
geotools dev geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject
Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposed new Webservices module
This is mostly the fault of Jody and myself. We chatted with Russel
2009/6/27 Justin Deoliveira wrote:
This is mostly the fault of Jody and myself. We chatted with Russel
personally and did not emphasise the part of the process in which Russel
should have first described his module to the mailing list.
Actually I'm relieved to hear that. I was assuming that
Nope:
A couple of clarifications ...
- I did ask if Russell had read the developers guide; since he was
already building with maven to work with Ben's team; and had the
geotools configuration stuff sorted out I thought we would be okay
- I gave him the link to the how to support your module;
+0 from me, I know nothing about it
--
___
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
-0, because I do not want to be a showstopper but as a PMC member I do
not think it is fair to accept a new module about which we know
nothing, especially from a new committer, therefore I was close to say
-1.
I'd say that it would be great to have some more information about the
scope and
This is mostly the fault of Jody and myself. We chatted with Russel
personally and did not emphasise the part of the process in which Russel
should have first described his module to the mailing list.
+1, since I already know the intent, but Russel (or Ben) can you provide
the background
russell.pe...@dpi.vic.gov.au ha scritto:
Hi Jody,
As we just discussed on the phone, I would like to propose a new
webservices module. This is a special type of data store that can hook
into AppSchema. This then allows complex features to be generated from a
webservice backend.
The
I can back fill a bit of information here; Mr Petty is covered under
CSIRO's blanket code contribution agreement. Now about that
confidentiality footer
Jody
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Andrea Aimeaa...@opengeo.org wrote:
russell.pe...@dpi.vic.gov.au ha scritto:
Hi Jody,
As we just
Thanks, Jody. I can confirm that Russell's work is owned by CSIRO, and
thus covered by the same CSIRO contributor agreement that covers me.
+1 on accepting the webservices module as an unsupported module.
Jody Garnett wrote:
I can back fill a bit of information here; Mr Petty is covered under
Hi Jody,
As we just discussed on the phone, I would like to propose a new
webservices module. This is a special type of data store that can hook
into AppSchema. This then allows complex features to be generated from a
webservice backend.
Russell Petty
Notice:
This email and any attachments
12 matches
Mail list logo
