On 12/05/10 14:21, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Yeah, sorry. For this specific case I knew the app-schema crew did not
> have any stake in 1.7.x/2.5.x (afaik you jumped straight from a 1.6.x
> branch to 2.0.x, correct?) so I just went ahead
Yes, you are quite right: app-schema jumped from 1.6.x/2.4.x stra
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> It is more likely that feedback will show a better way to do it; and
> that you will end up refactoring your work/approach. This clause is
> put in there for people running up against a deadline.
And as a tool to avoid work stagnation against PMC inaction.
A deep inspect
Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto:
>> Ok, removed the builds. That freed 1.6GB of hard drive space,
>> which is quite a bit given we only had 3GB left.
>> Hopefully that will keep the builds server going for another
>> while.
>
> Now that you've done it, I'd like to say yes, do it! :-)
>
> Seven hou
On 12/05/2010, at 2:28 PM, Michael Bedward wrote:
>> We are border line here; this was more of andrea being polite.
>
> Andrea is always polite (except to whiners :)
>
>> For proposals the min time is something like 10 days; with the ability to
>> commit after
>> three days (even if voting is n
> We are border line here; this was more of andrea being polite.
Andrea is always polite (except to whiners :)
> For proposals the min time is something like 10 days; with the ability to
> commit after
> three days (even if voting is not complete).
Developers' guide says...
- svn access for ch
We are border line here; this was more of andrea being polite.
For proposals the min time is something like 10 days; with the ability to
commit after three days (even if voting is not complete).
So we are already on top of this one :-)
Jody
On 12/05/2010, at 12:54 PM, Michael Bedward wrote:
>
On 12/05/10 10:54, Michael Bedward wrote:
> Yes, perhaps we could resolve to have a minimum time for review of
> proposals. What about three working days (ie. Monday - Friday) ?
Thanks, Michael, I think that would be a good rule of thumb. Or as
little as 24 hours for minor changes.
--
Ben Carad
On 12 May 2010 11:47, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
>
> the hope that, in the future, if you want my input you will give me a
> chance to provide it. :-)
Yes, perhaps we could resolve to have a minimum time for review of
proposals. What about three working days (ie. Monday - Friday) ?
Michael
-
On 12/05/10 01:25, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Andrea Aime ha scritto:
>> Hi,
>> lately we're a bit short on space on the main Hudson server:
>> http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/
>>
>> It would be useful to remove a bit of the older builds, like
>> the GeoTools 2.5.x one and the GeoServer 1.7.x ones.
>>
>
Andrea Aime ha scritto:
> Hi,
> lately we're a bit short on space on the main Hudson server:
> http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/
>
> It would be useful to remove a bit of the older builds, like
> the GeoTools 2.5.x one and the GeoServer 1.7.x ones.
>
> I think they are not being useful anymore, a
Michael Bedward ha scritto:
> On 11 May 2010 20:16, Andrea Aime wrote:
>> I think they are not being useful anymore, anyways, no?
>>
>
> I guess it would be a good idea to check on the user list to see if
> anyone there will be affected.
I'd rather not do that. Reasoning: we need that space to ke
On 11 May 2010 20:16, Andrea Aime wrote:
>
> I think they are not being useful anymore, anyways, no?
>
I guess it would be a good idea to check on the user list to see if
anyone there will be affected.
Michael
--
__
For my parts this would be ok. I will not do any backports to these versions.
Quoting Andrea Aime :
> Hi,
> lately we're a bit short on space on the main Hudson server:
> http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/
>
> It would be useful to remove a bit of the older builds, like
> the GeoTools 2.5.x one an
Hi,
lately we're a bit short on space on the main Hudson server:
http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/
It would be useful to remove a bit of the older builds, like
the GeoTools 2.5.x one and the GeoServer 1.7.x ones.
I think they are not being useful anymore, anyways, no?
Cheers
Andrea
--
Andrea A
14 matches
Mail list logo
