Re: [Geotools-devel] Removing old/unused/aborted

I can copy the code over; (I recently used them with Simon Greener who was looking at measure support - details in Jira). But I don't want to cause trouble for the first person to build with oracle. -- Jody Garnett On Sunday, 15 May 2011 at 7:38 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at

Re: [Geotools-devel] Removing old/unused/aborted

On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: > 2) Need to rescue the SDO test cases from oracle-spatial (the jdbc-ng only > took the SDO class and not the test cases). > > Be my guest and go ahead. > > I don't have oracle to verify the test; I am just saying that this work is > not done;

Re: [Geotools-devel] Removing old/unused/aborted

1) Need to remove the following from docs. > The following... ? >From the previous email (that I was replying to): -sql-datastore -oracle-spatial -gpx2 -geometryless -mysql -db2 Looks like mebedward has already done the deed. Thanks! > > 2) Need to rescue the SDO test cases from oracle-spatial (t

Re: [Geotools-devel] Removing old/unused/aborted

On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: > A couple more things need to be done for this to be closed off. > 1) Need to remove the following from docs. The following... ? > 2) Need to rescue the SDO test cases from oracle-spatial (the jdbc-ng only > took the SDO class and not the tes

Re: [Geotools-devel] Removing old/unused/aborted

A couple more things need to be done for this to be closed off. 1) Need to remove the following from docs. 2) Need to rescue the SDO test cases from oracle-spatial (the jdbc-ng only took the SDO class and not the test cases). 3) Need to sort out Jira; what is the call on this can I mark all of

Re: [Geotools-devel] Removing old/unused/aborted

Looks like support for coverages from Matlab 5 data files. On 09/05/11 20:38, Jody Garnett wrote: > What is "matfile5"? -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineering Team Leader CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian Resources Research Centre -

Re: [Geotools-devel] Removing old/unused/aborted

matfile5 reads (some) matlab5 version 5, the only one (to our knowledge) that is documented. Regards, Simone Giannecchini --- Ing. Simone Giannecchini GeoSolutions S.A.S. Founder Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054  Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39

Re: [Geotools-devel] Removing old/unused/aborted

Sounds good; I also had a couple of questions; probably stuff I just don't use: What is "matfile5"? Can we rename gt-swt to just swt. I am sorry we have to keep postgis-versioned / postgis for now; one thing we could do as a temporary measure is disable the factory for the postgis module (or com

Re: [Geotools-devel] Removing old/unused/aborted

Dear All, as per our emails, I am about to remove: -sql-datastore -oracle-spatial -gpx2 -geometryless -mysql -db2 Regards, Simone Giannecchini --- Ing. Simone Giannecchini GeoSolutions S.A.S. Founder Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054  Massarosa

Re: [Geotools-devel] Removing old/unused/aborted

Please remove the old db2 module. It even seems that I am the only guy using the new db2-ng module. There are no mails concerning db2 on the user lists (geotools and geoserver) and I will not invest one second for bug fixing in the old module. Quoting Simone Giannecchini : > Dear All, > tr

Re: [Geotools-devel] Removing old/unused/aborted

The svn repository moved some time ago to osgeo hardware: - http://svn.osgeo.org/geotools/trunk/modules/unsupported/excel/ GeoTools and GeoServer in general get along very well together so installation would stay simple; Ian Turton also expressed interest in the Excel plugin and may be able to i

Re: [Geotools-devel] Removing old/unused/aborted

Hi, I actually completed and submitted the changes to the GeoServer Excel output format plugin. You can see the code here: http://svn.codehaus.org/geoserver/trunk/src/extension/excel/src/main/java/org/geoserver/wfs/response/

Re: [Geotools-devel] Removing old/unused/aborted

On 7 May 2011 19:44, Jody Garnett wrote: > Quick question; the excel plugin was mentioned recently on the geoserver > (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-4461) list by Shane. > Shane we we considering dropping things from GeoTools unsupported that do > not have a friend. > Perhaps you would cons

Re: [Geotools-devel] Removing old/unused/aborted

Dear All, trying to reach a first step in this cleaning effort, I have identified this list: - caching? Looks like an abandoned module to me - db2 - mysql - oracle-spatial - sql-datastore - geometryless - gpx2 Can I move forward and remove these modules? We can then discuss about better ways to h

Re: [Geotools-devel] Removing old/unused/aborted

Quick question; the excel plugin was mentioned recently on the geoserver (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-4461) list by Shane. Shane we we considering dropping things from GeoTools unsupported that do not have a friend. Perhaps you would consider becoming co-module maintainer with Ian Turto

Re: [Geotools-devel] Removing old/unused/aborted

On 7 May 2011 03:07, Jody Garnett wrote: > Asking people to grab stuff from the past would also work for me; the > downside is we cannot > ask people to fix things in the past. > So what would the procedure be; they would ask on the email list if they can > work on "excel" for example; and > copy

Re: [Geotools-devel] Removing old/unused/aborted

That's not the angle we're trying to hit here. We have customers, and potential > ones, complaining that GeoTools is full of "junk" and they point at the > unsupported modules. So it's a cleanup angle, has nothing to do with > that is useful or not useful from the pov or GeoServer and uDig. I don't

Re: [Geotools-devel] Removing old/unused/aborted

On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 6:52 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: > This discussion is striking me badly as many of these represent our > technical direction; and I am not interested in killing them just because > they are not used by geoserver or uDig. That's not the angle we're trying to hit here. We have cu

Re: [Geotools-devel] Removing old/unused/aborted

On 7 May 2011 14:52, Jody Garnett wrote: > So let me suggest a more radical move: > - kick unsupported into a separate branch (we already don't make it as part > of our download; lets not make it as part of our maven build either), and we > can supply instructions on how to build the code. This wo

Re: [Geotools-devel] Removing old/unused/aborted

This discussion is striking me badly as many of these represent our technical direction; and I am not interested in killing them just because they are not used by geoserver or uDig. I think a larger issue is that some of these modules have not attracted any "replacement" module maintainer. Perh

Re: [Geotools-devel] Removing old/unused/aborted

As with Justin I would like to keep postgis versioned around (I expect I will soon have budget to formally port it to jdbc-ng). I had a request for vpf via private email recently; so it is still used. There is a completely useless "gpx2" module. whatnick was interested in jts-wrapper and geometr

Re: [Geotools-devel] Removing old/unused/aborted

On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Simone Giannecchini > wrote: > > Ciao a tutti, > > after hearing complaints about the size of geotools when checking out > > from svn I decided > > to take a look at what we could remove/reduce. > > > > Here is s

Re: [Geotools-devel] Removing old/unused/aborted

On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Simone Giannecchini wrote: > Ciao a tutti, > after hearing complaints about the size of geotools when checking out > from svn I decided > to take a look at what we could remove/reduce. > > Here is some modules which I think we could remove, of course I need > to tal

[Geotools-devel] Removing old/unused/aborted

Ciao a tutti, after hearing complaints about the size of geotools when checking out from svn I decided to take a look at what we could remove/reduce. Here is some modules which I think we could remove, of course I need to talk to you guys in order to understand what can be achieved: - caching? Lo