Thanks Simone. See below.
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 10:55 AM Simone Giannecchini <
simone.giannecch...@geo-solutions.it> wrote:
> Ciao Justing,
> please, read below
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 6:18 PM, Justin Deoliveira
> wrote:
> > Thanks for the input Simone. Comments inline below.
> >
>
Ciao Justing,
please, read below
Regards,
Simone Giannecchini
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts!
Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
==
Ing. Simone Giannecchini
@simogeo
Founder/Director
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via di Montramito 3/A
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone
Thanks for the input Simone. Comments inline below.
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 10:07 AM Simone Giannecchini <
simone.giannecch...@geo-solutions.it> wrote:
> See below..
>
> Regards,
> Simone Giannecchini
> ==
> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts!
> Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more i
See below..
Regards,
Simone Giannecchini
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts!
Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
==
Ing. Simone Giannecchini
@simogeo
Founder/Director
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via di Montramito 3/A
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax:
Hey folks.
I just pushed a branch into my repo that contains a coverage reader for
solr heatmaps:
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/compare/master...jdeolive:solr-heatmap
A few notes.
First, I tried playing around with using simple interpolation for
smoothing. While it provided something ni
Let me know how it goes,
we have some potential work in the pipeline for Solr and this is
_very_ interesting for us.
Regards,
Simone Giannecchini
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts!
Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
==
Ing. Simone Giannecchini
@simogeo
Founder/Direc
Thanks a lot for the feedback guys. Simply using interpolation to do the
smoothing makes a lot of sense! Thanks Simone. I am going to experiment a
bit more and I’ll come back with my findings.
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 7:09 AM Simone Giannecchini <
simone.giannecch...@geo-solutions.it> wrote:
> Ciao
Ciao Justin,
adding to Andrea's, please, read below...
Regards,
Simone Giannecchini
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts!
Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
==
Ing. Simone Giannecchini
@simogeo
Founder/Director
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via di Montramito 3/A
55054 Massaros
I like the approach of using a new kind of coverage reader, the limitation
is of course providing a suitable grid size (even though as an actual
coverage your mathematical surface is not limited to a grid).
--
Jody Garnett
On 6 April 2016 at 13:02, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I’m w
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:02 PM, Justin Deoliveira
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I’m working on a project to expose Solr’s heatmap capability through
> GeoServer. You can find details about Solr heatmaps here:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Spatial+Search (search
> for “Heatmap
Justin,
Ayup, the HeatMap Process already have a notion that you have to mess
with the query.
In a method like invertQuery:
https://github.com/locationtech/geomesa/blob/master/geomesa-process/src/main/scala/org/locationtech/geomesa/process/DensityProcess.scala#L98-L125
one can munge the query
Thanks for the info Jim. Indeed that was my first inclination as well but
once I thought about it I started to struggle with how I could fit it into
the vector pipeline cleanly. HeatmapProcess didn’t seem to really apply
since the aggregation needs to be done on the Solr side and not by the
renderi
Hi Justin,
Since it is somewhat similar, I wanted to share how GeoMesa creates
heatmaps using GeoServer. We have a small WPS which riffs on the
HeatMapProcess (1). That process is called via an SLD. By doing that,
we can have a regular vector layer, but then generate heatmaps for it
withou
Hi folks,
I’m working on a project to expose Solr’s heatmap capability through
GeoServer. You can find details about Solr heatmaps here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Spatial+Search (search
for “Heatmap Faceting”.
But the gist of it is this: If you have a spatial field tha
14 matches
Mail list logo
