Re: [Geotools-devel] Spatial Relations - Alternative Syntax

2008-10-21 Thread Mauricio Pazos
I added the release pan column in the Tasks table. http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Extention+of+CQL+to+match+abilities+of+Filter#Tasks On Tuesday 21 October 2008 20:29:53 Mauricio Pazos wrote: > On Tuesday 21 October 2008 15:07:23 Andrea Aime wrote: > > Both syntaxes are fine to me, I'd

Re: [Geotools-devel] Spatial Relations - Alternative Syntax

2008-10-21 Thread Mauricio Pazos
On Tuesday 21 October 2008 15:07:23 Andrea Aime wrote: > Both syntaxes are fine to me, I'd suggest to choose > the one that keeps the module the simplest and/or > takes less time to implement. I agree, the first syntax (function like) is implemented. My idea is to close this iteration now and exte

Re: [Geotools-devel] Spatial Relations - Alternative Syntax

2008-10-21 Thread Andrea Aime
Mauricio Pazos ha scritto: > Hi list, I am working in the TXT proposal > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Extention+of+CQL+to+match+abilities+of+Filter > > A week ago, we was analysing a possibility to improve the spatial relation > predicates. > > Nowadays, TXT implements the spatial p

[Geotools-devel] Spatial Relations - Alternative Syntax

2008-10-21 Thread Mauricio Pazos
Hi list, I am working in the TXT proposal http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Extention+of+CQL+to+match+abilities+of+Filter A week ago, we was analysing a possibility to improve the spatial relation predicates. Nowadays, TXT implements the spatial predicate - OGC Filter 1.1 - That is EQU