Hi list, I am working in the TXT proposal
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Extention+of+CQL+to+match+abilities+of+Filter
A week ago, we was analysing a possibility to improve the spatial relation
predicates.
Nowadays, TXT implements the spatial predicate - OGC Filter 1.1 - That is
Mauricio Pazos ha scritto:
Hi list, I am working in the TXT proposal
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Extention+of+CQL+to+match+abilities+of+Filter
A week ago, we was analysing a possibility to improve the spatial relation
predicates.
Nowadays, TXT implements the spatial
On Tuesday 21 October 2008 15:07:23 Andrea Aime wrote:
Both syntaxes are fine to me, I'd suggest to choose
the one that keeps the module the simplest and/or
takes less time to implement.
I agree, the first syntax (function like) is implemented. My idea is to close
this iteration now and extend
