> Where is this information recorded?
OSGeo keeps them on file. You can talk to i...@osgeo.org if you need to check
or retrieve a copy.
As an example I had to ask for Maurcio a couple of weeks ago - since Axios is
no longer in business we wanted to establish that they understood their
employee
aters even further?
-Original Message-
From: Ben Caradoc-Davies [mailto:ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au]
Sent: Monday, 17 June 2013 1:24 PM
To: Andrea Aime
Cc: geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Geotools-devel] Updated contributor guide to reflect small-patch
policy
On 14/06/
-dav...@csiro.au]
> Sent: Monday, 17 June 2013 1:24 PM
> To: Andrea Aime
> Cc: geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Geotools-devel] Updated contributor guide to reflect
> small-patch policy
>
> On 14/06/13 16:28, Andrea Aime wrote:
>> What worries me is that w
On 14/06/13 16:28, Andrea Aime wrote:
> What worries me is that we demand a test to be added for each
> contribution, so people will be hard pressed
> to find an existing class to use in order to contribute the fix without
> having to add a file.
> Maybe we can be gentle and add a empty test class
Emailed.
--
Jody Garnett
On Friday, 14 June 2013 at 5:36 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies
> mailto:ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au)> wrote:
> > Jody,
> >
> > here is an update for the contributor guide to reflect the small patch
> > policy, as discus
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies <
ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au> wrote:
> On 14/06/13 15:49, Andrea Aime wrote:
>
>> Do app-schema tests have headers? None of the modules I'm familiar with
>> has headers in test classes, that I remember at least
>>
>
> Every one I wrote or cleane
On 14/06/13 15:53, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Nice. Should we ask them to cc the devel list when they send the
> contributor agreement?
> meh, as I write it I realize that would make their signature
> public, which is bad.
> The idea was to get immediate confirmation that the agreement was
> actuall
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies <
ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au> wrote:
> Yes. We have confirmed that there is no need to send the original.
Nice. Should we ask them to cc the devel list when they send the
contributor agreement?
meh, as I write it I realize that would make
On 14/06/13 15:49, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Do app-schema tests have headers? None of the modules I'm familiar with
> has headers in test classes, that I remember at least
Every one I wrote or cleaned up has them. But headers are not required
to enforce copyright; without them, no rights are lost. I
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies <
ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au> wrote:
> Yes. We are redistributing tests, just not to end users.
>
> In my view, tests are code too and need headers and copyright.
>
Do app-schema tests have headers? None of the modules I'm familiar with
has hea
On 14/06/13 15:45, Andrea Aime wrote:
> One more thing. You say new file, should we qualify new non testing file?
> If someone is adding a testing resource, or a new test class, stuff that
> does not get redistributed
> along with the binaries... should they sign anyways?
Yes. We are redistributin
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies <
ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au> wrote:
> Yes. We have confirmed that there is no need to send the original.
One more thing. You say new file, should we qualify new non testing file?
If someone is adding a testing resource, or a new test class, s
Yes. We have confirmed that there is no need to send the original.
On 14/06/13 15:36, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Very quick recap, there is one thing I don't remember.
> The new contribution agreement can be faxed or e-mailed, right?
--
Ben Caradoc-Davies
Software Engineer
CSIRO Earth Science and Res
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies <
ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au> wrote:
> Jody,
>
> here is an update for the contributor guide to reflect the small patch
> policy, as discussed at Monday's committee meeting:
> https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/212
Very quick recap, the
Thanks. Merged.
On 14/06/13 15:23, Jody wrote:
> +1
>
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
> On Friday, 14 June 2013 at 4:57 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
>
>> Jody,
>>
>> here is an update for the contributor guide to reflect the small patch
>> policy, as discussed at Monday's committee meeting:
>> https://gith
+1
--
Jody Garnett
On Friday, 14 June 2013 at 4:57 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> Jody,
>
> here is an update for the contributor guide to reflect the small patch
> policy, as discussed at Monday's committee meeting:
> https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/212
>
> - Patches that add n
Jody,
here is an update for the contributor guide to reflect the small patch
policy, as discussed at Monday's committee meeting:
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/212
- Patches that add new files require a contributor agreement, small
patches to existing files do not.
- A little rewordi
17 matches
Mail list logo
