Re: [Geotools-devel] cascading WFS

2009-03-03 Thread Gabriel Roldán
Hi Tim, glad to see you've been making good progress on this, and also glad to hear you're interested in becomming a commiter for the wfs module. What you need to do to make that happen is to create a jira issue explaining the bug/improvement/whatever (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT) and

Re: [Geotools-devel] cascading WFS

2009-02-16 Thread Keane, Tim
Gabriel- I have been working on producing the requests and responses as you suggested. However, I am having a no luck getting ArcGIS Server's WFS to properly apply Filters to GetFeature requests. So for now I am going to back burner this. Thanks for your help. -Tim

Re: [Geotools-devel] cascading WFS

2009-02-12 Thread Gabriel Roldan
On Thursday 12 February 2009 15:32:22 Keane, Tim wrote: Gabriel- I have been working on producing the requests and responses as you suggested. However, I am having a no luck getting ArcGIS Server's WFS to properly apply Filters to GetFeature requests. So for now I am going to back burner

Re: [Geotools-devel] cascading WFS

2009-02-12 Thread Jody Garnett
Correct ESRI WFS implementation - issues are here: - http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/UDIG-1287 - http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1501 So how about a GML2 and GML3 implementation based on justin's framework :-) I have had a couple of questions about the GMLDataStore in the last month; we

Re: [Geotools-devel] cascading WFS

2009-02-05 Thread Gabriel Roldan
Hi Tim, cc'ing the list confirmed we lack a binding in our parser for the ows:extendedCapabilities element. What would be good in order to make sure we support ArcGIS server is for you to create a JIRA issue for it (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT), assign to the data-wfs module, me