Re: [Geotools-devel] openrewrite for geotools

On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 12:28 AM patrick way wrote: > For now, I will put together some pull requests for some of the more > simple cleanup > > and security >

Re: [Geotools-devel] openrewrite for geotools

Greetings Jody and Adrea, The OpenRewrite JUnit 5 conversion is close enough so that the final manual effort is a reasonable task. The rewrite conversion differs from IntelliJ in that code is selectively auto-formatted, reducing the number of changes to review; also, some additional conversions

Re: [Geotools-devel] openrewrite for geotools

On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 2:08 AM patrick way wrote: > While the JUnit migration is large and complex, there are quite a few > smaller tasks that might also benefit the project. > The JUnit migration could be taken care of by IntelliJ too.. but we still have a bunch of classes that are JUnit3

Re: [Geotools-devel] openrewrite for geotools

Patrick: I am not quite sure how to answer your email. We of course welcome volunteers; and you are welcome to drop in to one of our project meetings (an invite/reminder is sent out every two weeks). I liked your use of GeoTools to refine your tools - the amazing quality control checks that are

[Geotools-devel] openrewrite for geotools

Hello, I am a geo-spatial enthusiast and member of the OpenRewrite team. Between 2002 and 2010, I leveraged GeoTools for a geo-spatially enabled restricted materials permitting program in California. At the time, I was too busy and not able to contribute. Now that I have an opportunity, I would