Simone Giannecchini ha scritto:
> I guess that is a +1 :-)
Yep, it is
Cheers
Andrea
--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.
--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting -
I guess that is a +1 :-)
Simone.
---
Ing. Simone Giannecchini
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Founder - Software Engineer
Via Carignoni 51
55041 Camaiore (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584983027
fax: +39 0584983027
mob:+39 333 8128928
http://www.geo-sol
Simone Giannecchini ha scritto:
> Ciao Andrea, Alessio,
> I guess we are past that, we already discussed taking over the
> ownership in the past.
> I would simply suggest to have alessio as the new module mantainer
> with me and daniele, to back him up.
>
> Do you have any feedback about my plan f
Ciao Andrea, Alessio,
I guess we are past that, we already discussed taking over the
ownership in the past.
I would simply suggest to have alessio as the new module mantainer
with me and daniele, to back him up.
Do you have any feedback about my plan for temporal as I expressed it
on my previous e
Alessio Fabiani ha scritto:
> Hi guys,
>
> if you all agree I would start the porting of the temporal module to trunk.
>
> Here is the documentation page
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/GeoAPI+Temporal+Implementation
>
> also the IP review is there.
>
> The only pending issue is tha
Hi guys,
if you all agree I would start the porting of the temporal module to trunk.
Here is the documentation page
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/GeoAPI+Temporal+Implementation
also the IP review is there.
The only pending issue is that actually the module mantainer is Mehdi
Sidhoum
Ciao Jody,
my opinion is that the long term goal is to have temporal part of
referencing since we need to rely on the notion of temporalcrs and in
the end what iso 19108 can be seen as a companion to direct position
classes and the like.
This of course involves working also at the geoapi level, the
> About this last sentence, I propose also to merge directly the temporal
> stuff into the referencing module instead of having a separate module on
> library.
> What do you think about that?
> Cheers,
> Alessio.
It makes sense from an abstraction point of view; however right now we
are
Alessio Fabiani ha scritto:
> Hello Jody,
>
> thanks for the reply ... I agree to move the discussion on GeoApi ml and
> try to find an agreement as soon as possible in order to fill this gap.
>
> It is also worth to point out that it is quite urgent, imho, to move
> forward this matter and to
Hello Jody,
thanks for the reply ... I agree to move the discussion on GeoApi ml and try
to find an agreement as soon as possible in order to fill this gap.
It is also worth to point out that it is quite urgent, imho, to move forward
this matter and to have soon an improvement of the referencing
Hi Alessio:
Thanks for starting the discussion.
On 20/11/2009, at 1:38 PM, Alessio Fabiani wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm working a bit on the unsupported temporal module for ISO 19108
> implementation ... actually is in a quite good state even if still remain
> something to implement
> (http://do
11 matches
Mail list logo
