OTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; gep-ed@listserve1.allegheny.edu
Sent: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 9:21 pm
Subject: Re: Critique on Amory Lovins / RMI
I think that -- as Bram and others had noted earlier, and as the piece by
amien White that I recommended on this list argues --
>
> To: Ronnie Lipschutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Geoffrey Wandesforde-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Bram Büscher'"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Matthew Paterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; willett
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Global Environmental Educ
AIL PROTECTED]>; willett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Global Environmental Education
Sent: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:35 pm
Subject: Re: Critique on Amory Lovins / RMI
GEPED folks:
Lovins' stuff in the 1970s was interesting for numerous reasons, but in many
ways much more interesting than his ma
gt; >deployed remains, as an intrinsic element of
> >policy design, unclear and uncertain. The
> >market will apparently reveal them in the
> >fullness of time. The UC LCFS report, including
> >a technical volume and a policy analysis volume,
> >is available for download f
n Behalf Of Bram Büscher
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 12:29 AM
To: Matthew Paterson; willett
Cc: Global Environmental Education
Subject: RE: Critique on Amory Lovins / RMI
Thanks for this clarification Matthew. Perhaps I
was too quick in my assertion, but why I felt
especially uncomfortable w
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bram Büscher
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 12:29 AM
To: Matthew Paterson; willett
Cc: Global Environmental Education
Subject: RE: Critique on Amory Lovins / RMI
Thanks for this clarification Matthew. Perhaps I was too quick in my
assertion, but why I
Title: RE: Critique on Amory Lovins / RMI
Thanks for this clarification Matthew. Perhaps I was too quick in my assertion, but why I felt especially uncomfortable with the way in which Lovins presented (as such interesting) technological innovations, was that it actually obfuscates wider
371
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web site: http://www.socialsciences.uottawa.ca/pol/eng/index.asp
From: willett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 15:39:59 -0500
To: Bram Büscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Global Environmental Education
Subject: Re: Critique on Amory Lovins /
Two decades ago, Denton Morrison published a couple of aritlces in the
sociological literatuares laying out all of Lovin's social science
assertions found in earlier books. He wasn't really critical but it
was clear that even the earlier work had huge numbers of unproven
assertions about s
John Meyer
> Critique on Amory Lovins / RMI
> Dear All,
>
> I was at the Berlin conference of the Human Dimensions of Global Change
> yesterday and attended a (video conference) presentation by dr. Amory
> Lovins of the Rocky Mountain institute. I have seen few people so bluntl
Title: Critique on Amory Lovins / RMI
Dear All,
I was at the Berlin conference of the Human Dimensions of Global Change yesterday and attended a (video conference) presentation by dr. Amory Lovins of the Rocky Mountain institute. I have seen few people so bluntly reduce all environmental
11 matches
Mail list logo
