What I'm hoping to do using get_iplayer is to be able to compare such
results with an analysis or decoding to LPCM of the flv by other means.
i.e. use ffmpeg or similar. I'm wondering if anyone else here has already
done this, or has comments that would help.
Hi
Are you asking for
Jim Lesurf j...@audiomisc.co.uk wrote:
One complication here I've already hit is that IIUC the xfce mint distro
I'm using doesn't provide ffmpeg but avcodec (?) I've installed a local
version of ffmpeg but am unsure of how avcodec may differ from this in
ways that may affect what I have in
On 08 Nov, Jeremy Nicoll - ml get_iplayer
jn.ml.gti...@wingsandbeaks.org.uk wrote:
Jim Lesurf j...@audiomisc.co.uk wrote:
One complication here I've already hit is that IIUC the xfce mint
distro I'm using doesn't provide ffmpeg but avcodec (?) I've installed
a local version of ffmpeg but
On 08 Nov, batguano999 batguano...@zoho.com wrote:
What I'm hoping to do using get_iplayer is to be able to compare such
results with an analysis or decoding to LPCM of the flv by other means.
i.e. use ffmpeg or similar. I'm wondering if anyone else here has
already done this, or has
On 2014/11/08 09:47, Jim Lesurf wrote:
What I'm hoping to do using get_iplayer is to be able to compare such
results with an analysis or decoding to LPCM of the flv by other means.
i.e. use ffmpeg or similar. I'm wondering if anyone else here has already
done this, or has comments that would
Something possibly relevant avconv Used in Preference to ffmpeg Where
Available changed in 2.83; see notes at:
https://github.com/dinkypumpkin/get_iplayer/wiki/release283
and also changes in 2.87 Important note re: obsolete FFmpeg versions:
(also for avconv) - see:
On 08 Nov, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
On 2014/11/08 09:47, Jim Lesurf wrote:
but not avcodec. (Or have I got its name wrong? Afraid I've forgotten
if my memory was ever much better than nowdays. :-) )
The projects are ffmpeg and libav (a fork of ffmpeg). One of the
With 2.84 etc this worked. With 2.90 (I've not used any of the intermediate
versions), specifying for example:
--fatfilename --whitespace --file-prefix $GRAB-SN130-002369 R=nameshort -
Sseriesnum Eepisodenum - E=episodetitle 'E=episode' P=pid M=mode
Z=duration F=firsbcastdate L=lastbcastdate
Jeremy Nicoll - ml get_iplayer jn.ml.gti...@wingsandbeaks.org.uk wrote:
With 2.84 etc this worked. With 2.90 (I've not used any of the
intermediate versions), specifying for example:
--fatfilename --whitespace --file-prefix $GRAB...
produces a final file name like:
$GRAB...
Oops. It
Blasted mailing list, I sent the message below as a personal reply, AGAIN. I
simply cannot get my brain to accept how this list works. I'm on half a dozen
other mailing lists all of which work the other way round ie. replies go to the
list. Mutter.
--
Owen Smith owen.sm...@cantab.net
On 08/11/2014 12:40, Jeremy Nicoll - ml get_iplayer wrote:
--fatfilename --whitespace --file-prefix $GRAB-SN130-002369 R=nameshort -
--whitespace changed with 2.87. See the 2.87 release notes.
___
get_iplayer mailing list
On 08/11/2014 13:52, dinkypumpkin wrote:
On 08/11/2014 12:40, Jeremy Nicoll - ml get_iplayer wrote:
--fatfilename --whitespace --file-prefix $GRAB-SN130-002369
R=nameshort -
--whitespace changed with 2.87. See the 2.87 release notes.
Sorry - seems you already knew that. Will look again.
On 08 Nov, Owen Smith owen.sm...@cantab.net wrote:
Blasted mailing list, I sent the message below as a personal reply,
AGAIN. I simply cannot get my brain to accept how this list works. I'm
on half a dozen other mailing lists all of which work the other way
round ie. replies go to the list.
cough Me to. Read it in an email list or newsgroup the default reply should
be back to the list/group otherwise threads dive off into private email. The
use of Reply All means that the sender has to edit the recipient's or the
recipient annoyingly gets the posting twice.
Probably in the best
The person that runs this mailing list has VERY firm views about how they
should work. This is at odds with every other mailing I have ever been on,
which must be around 50 by now. He feels it should work the same way as a
direct email sent to multiple people, in that Reply goes just to the
On 08/11/2014 13:58, dinkypumpkin wrote:
On 08/11/2014 13:52, dinkypumpkin wrote:
On 08/11/2014 12:40, Jeremy Nicoll - ml get_iplayer wrote:
--fatfilename --whitespace --file-prefix $GRAB-SN130-002369
R=nameshort -
--whitespace changed with 2.87. See the 2.87 release notes.
Sorry - seems
On Sat, 8 Nov 2014 14:36:19 +
Owen Smith owen.sm...@cantab.net wrote:
The person that runs this mailing list has VERY firm views about how
they should work. This is at odds with every other mailing I have
ever been on, which must be around 50 by now. He feels it should work
the same way
I read most of my email on my iPad 3, I find it much more convenient than
firing up my Windows laptop. I can use the iPad wherever in the house I happen
to be. I doubt Apple are going to listen to my requests to change the email
software, and anyway I don't agree it does anything wrong. It
And when I Reply to All my own posting, it does go To: the list. So this is
partly down to how other people are sending to the list. I suspect if they CC'd
the list, then Reply to All also CC's the list, which is correct behaviour. So
why are people CCing a mailing list in the first place?
--
On 5 November 2014 16:40, C E Macfarlane c.e.macfarl...@macfh.co.uk wrote:
I believe that there is some policy concerning things like word-processor
documents and spreadsheets, but I'm not aware of anything that covers
publicly available raw electronic data.
You've evidently not seen the
Just use reply all. If somebody doesn't like duplicates, they can go
to http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/get_iplayer and set
Avoid duplicate copies of messages? to yes.
Thanks for that, now set. Not an option I've seen before but then I'm not in
the habit of exploring mailman
On 08 Nov, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
Just use reply all. If somebody doesn't like duplicates, they can go to
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/get_iplayer and set Avoid
duplicate copies of messages? to yes.
I'll try that and see if it puts the *list* address in
On 08 Nov, Owen Smith owen.sm...@cantab.net wrote:
The person that runs this mailing list has VERY firm views about how
they should work. This is at odds with every other mailing I have ever
been on, which must be around 50 by now. He feels it should work the
same way as a direct email sent to
On 08 Nov, Dave Liquorice allso...@howhill.com wrote:
Just use reply all. If somebody doesn't like duplicates, they can go
to http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/get_iplayer and set
Avoid duplicate copies of messages? to yes.
Thanks for that, now set.
Same here. I'll see what
On 08/11/2014 14:10, Jim Lesurf wrote:
On 08 Nov, Owen Smith owen.sm...@cantab.net wrote:
Blasted mailing list, I sent the message below as a personal reply,
AGAIN. I simply cannot get my brain to accept how this list works. I'm
on half a dozen other mailing lists all of which work the other
Hi Chris
I think you might simply have to use
C:\Program Files (x86)\get_iplayerget_iplayer --prefs-show
(to verify the state of the --aactomp3 flag)
Then use --prefs-del --aactomp3 to clear the flag
C:\Program Files (x86)\get_iplayerget_iplayer --prefs-del --aactomp3
INFO: Deleted option
Hi Kevin - thank you - that did the job. Speeded up my Run PVM too
Chris B.
On 08/11/2014, Kevin Lynch klyn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Chris
I think you might simply have to use
C:\Program Files (x86)\get_iplayerget_iplayer --prefs-show
(to verify the state of the --aactomp3 flag)
Then
One of mine is that i never can see my own postings in Thunderbird,
despite setting my options on the mailing list site to see my own postings
___
get_iplayer mailing list
get_iplayer@lists.infradead.org
On 8 November 2014 19:33, Charles Johnson cehjohn...@gmail.com wrote:
One of mine is that i never can see my own postings in Thunderbird,
despite setting my options on the mailing list site to see my own postings
That is actually Gmail behaviour - it detects that it is the same
message you
On 08/11/14 19:38, Shevek wrote:
That is actually Gmail behaviour - it detects that it is the same
message you sent and doesn't deliver it to your inbox.
Thanks for that. I suppose that could be remedied by sending from a
non-Gmail account
C.
___
On 08/11/14 17:14, Alan Milewczyk wrote:
so why duplicate a copy to an individual, as some seem to do on here?
I suppose in certain cases it might be seen as 'belt and braces'
behaviour (why not?)
___
get_iplayer mailing list
On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 08:38:13PM +, Charles Johnson wrote:
On 08/11/14 17:14, Alan Milewczyk wrote:
so why duplicate a copy to an individual, as some seem to do on here?
I suppose in certain cases it might be seen as 'belt and braces'
behaviour (why not?)
Because it can cause replies to
As requested in the original thread, I've created three patch files.
1) This patches get_iplayer v2.90 to use nice with the parameter -n 19,
which by effectively making it run in the background compared with processes
such as serving files, makes it more suitable for embedded devices acting
On Sat, 2014-11-08 at 14:10 +, Jim Lesurf wrote:
On 08 Nov, Owen Smith owen.sm...@cantab.net wrote:
Blasted mailing list, I sent the message below as a personal reply,
AGAIN. I simply cannot get my brain to accept how this list works. I'm
on half a dozen other mailing lists all of which
On 8 November 2014 21:24, David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org wrote:
On Sat, 2014-11-08 at 14:10 +, Jim Lesurf wrote:
On 08 Nov, Owen Smith owen.sm...@cantab.net wrote:
Blasted mailing list, I sent the message below as a personal reply,
AGAIN. I simply cannot get my brain to accept how
David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org wrote:
Now think about what happens if you *don't* do people the courtesy of
copying them directly. Some people will be cut out of the conversation
*entirely*
- only if they weren't mail list subscribers in the first place. Arguably
they shouldn't have been
On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 10:01:46PM +, Colin Law wrote:
However the fact is that this is the way the administrator of the list
want it to work and since he/she donates his free time to maintaining
it we all have to be grateful for that and accept the way it works.
Indeed. David's list, his
On 8 Nov 2014 at 17:14, Alan Milewczyk Alan Milewczyk
a...@soulman1949.com wrote:
On 08/11/2014 14:10, Jim Lesurf wrote:
On 08 Nov, Owen Smith owen.sm...@cantab.net wrote:
Blasted mailing list, I sent the message below as a personal reply,
AGAIN. I simply cannot get my brain to accept how
On Sat, 2014-11-08 at 22:02 +, Jeremy Nicoll - ml get_iplayer wrote:
David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org wrote:
Now think about what happens if you *don't* do people the courtesy of
copying them directly. Some people will be cut out of the conversation
*entirely*
- only if they
I had hoped by saying we'd discussed this before we could avoid all this rant.
Apparently not.
The facts as I see it are:
1) David has a VERY entrenched deeply held belief about this
2) almost no-one else on the list agrees with him in principle
3) notwithstanding 2), many agree David runs the
Cross posting between multiple mailing lists is something that I have a serious
downer on. People don't always agree to their postings being published
elsewhere, or their email address being publicised outside of the lists they
have subscribed to. As such I regard issues about who a reply goes
Agree totally, it's an absolute no-no AFAIAC.
On 08/11/2014 22:40, Owen Smith wrote:
Cross posting between multiple mailing lists is something that I have a serious
downer on. People don't always agree to their postings being published
elsewhere, or their email address being publicised
It looks the BBC have removed the RTMP streams for live TV. At least,
they're no longer where get_iplayer looks for them. If anyone knows
that they are still running, and how to locate them, let me know. Since
the live streams were switched to Adobe HDS a little while back, it's no
surprise
On 08/11/2014 21:24, David Woodhouse wrote:
Your email client — every email client — has (at least) two options for
*how* to reply to an email.
First there's the private reply which goes only to the sender of the
original email.
And then there's the public reply to all which goes to everyone
What is AOD? A TLA I don't recognise (something On Demand?)
--
Owen Smith owen.sm...@cantab.net
Cambridge, UK
On 8 Nov 2014, at 22:52, dinkypumpkin dinkypump...@gmail.com wrote:
It looks the BBC have removed the RTMP streams for live TV. At least,
they're no longer where get_iplayer looks
On 09/11/2014 00:23, Owen Smith wrote:
What is AOD? A TLA I don't recognise (something On Demand?)
Audio On Demand, I think.
___
get_iplayer mailing list
get_iplayer@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/get_iplayer
On 08/11/14 21:08, C E Macfarlane wrote:
As requested in the original thread, I've created three patch files.
1)This patches get_iplayer v2.90 to use nice with the parameter -n 19,
which by effectively making it run in the background compared with processes
such as serving files, makes
On 08/11/14 22:01, Colin Law wrote:
The flaw in this logic is that when I send a message to the list I am
not sending it to individuals, I am sending it to the list.
Not if you are replying to someone's message. Then you are replying to a
message sent by a person - that is who you are
On 08/11/14 23:05, Peter S Kirk wrote:
Yes, David runs the list. However, he should respect the preferences of
list members who as you say almost no-one else on the list agrees with him
in principle.
I very much agree in principle, and in practice.
David's reasoning is sound, and also
Hi all,
When I issue a refresh, I get to see the whole list of programs, not
only the new additions. I think this was not the behaviour until the
new site scraper came along. It is pointless now, but as the iplayer
archive increases to 30 days, it will become even worse. That scroll
shouldn't be
Hi all,
When I issue a refresh, I get to see the whole list of programs, not
only the new additions. I think this was not the behaviour until the
new site scraper came along. It is pointless now, but as the iplayer
archive increases to 30 days, it will become even worse. That scroll
shouldn't be
51 matches
Mail list logo
