Hi Simon, Andrey
> > 3. After this step, starting a shell failed altogether with
> "c:/msys64/mingw64_shell.bat is
> > not recognised as an internal or external command". And sure enough,
> there is no such file.
> > Presumably it existed in step 1. So perhaps step 2 deleted it?
> > [...]
> >
Hi Simon,
> 3. After this step, starting a shell failed altogether with
> "c:/msys64/mingw64_shell.bat is
> not recognised as an internal or external command". And sure enough, there is
> no such file.
> Presumably it existed in step 1. So perhaps step 2 deleted it?
> [...]
> 4. As you
Tamar
Thank you! Yes, it's in c:/msys64
Since I wrote more odd things have happened.
1. I just left the machine for 10-15 mins and lo! the shell windows opened up.
It just took a lng time.
At this point, starting a new shell no longer took a long time. It all seemed
to be working.
2.
On 27 June 2016 at 13:31, Christopher Done wrote:
> On 27 June 2016 at 10:01, Simon Marlow wrote:
> > On 26 June 2016 at 11:28, Christopher Done wrote:
> >>
> >> I've been pondering how feasible it would be to:
> >>
> >> * Compile
On 27 June 2016 at 10:01, Simon Marlow wrote:
> On 26 June 2016 at 11:28, Christopher Done wrote:
>>
>> I've been pondering how feasible it would be to:
>>
>> * Compile in stages a module with the byte code linker
>> * Keep hold of the Core source
>> *
On 27 June 2016 at 04:11, Edward Z. Yang wrote:
> I don't understand what the bytecode format has to do here. Since
> your suggestion is to just store Core you can just compile to object
> code.
True, I could compile to either as long as I can link it dynamically.
> > Any input
Congrats Simon : )
I use precisely the same machine!
While I haven't run into that particular problem, I do use an alternative
console that might provide a workaround in case you keep running into
trouble:
http://cmder.net/
My setup log is here, which explains how to use Cmder with MSYS2:
On 27. 6. 2016 10:01, Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs wrote:
> Friends, esp Tamar,
>
> I am in happy possession of a new Surface Book, running Windows 10, which is
> delightful – except that I can’t make the msys64 installation work, which is
> crucial for GHC. Can any of you help?
>
> ·
On 26 June 2016 at 11:28, Christopher Done wrote:
> I've been pondering how feasible it would be to:
>
> * Compile in stages a module with the byte code linker
> * Keep hold of the Core source
> * Interpret the Core AST within Haskell
>
Interestingly, the first
Friends, esp Tamar,
I am in happy possession of a new Surface Book, running Windows 10, which is
delightful - except that I can't make the msys64 installation work, which is
crucial for GHC. Can any of you help?
*I install it from here:
I believe I've just fixed this. I think it was non-deterministic in some
way that I don't fully understand, but hopefully I've made it deterministic
now.
https://phabricator.haskell.org/rGHC7843c71c7e48cdba115bef422184e855ede23a67
On 24 June 2016 at 15:12, Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs <
Yes, it was the sizeExpr fix. It validated locally and on Travis, but I'm
guessing it was right on the boundary.
On 22 June 2016 at 22:37, Bartosz Nitka wrote:
> Appears to be:
> a47b62cb3685 Second attempt to fix sizeExpr
>
>
12 matches
Mail list logo