On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 07:41:09PM -0500, Alexis King wrote:
> type applications in patterns are still not enough to satisfy me. I
> provided the empty argument list example because it was simple, but I’d
> also like this to typecheck:
>
> baz :: Int -> String -> Widget
> baz =
>
Hi Simon,
I haven't experienced this issue myself, but I've seen a merge request
intended to address it:
https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/merge_requests/5372
Cheers,
Simon
Am Fr., 26. März 2021 um 18:38 Uhr schrieb Simon Peyton Jones via
ghc-devs :
>
> Folks
>
> I’m getting a lot of this
>
Folks
I'm getting a lot of this
simonpj@MSRC-3645512:~/code/HEAD-3$ git status
On branch wip/T19569
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/wip/T19569'.
Changes not staged for commit:
(use "git add ..." to update what will be committed)
(use "git restore ..." to discard changes in
Hi Richard,
I am sorry, I have indeed forgotten one of the most important parts of my
email. :)
The Hadrian rules are
lint:base
lint:compiler
You can invoke them as simply as:
./hadrian/build lint:base
You need to have a recent version of HLint in your PATH. If you use
ghc.nix, this
This link gives some (old) background
https://wiki.haskell.org/GHC/FAQ#Why_isn.27t_GHC_available_for_.NET_or_on_the_JVM.3F
Simon
From: ghc-devs On Behalf Of Moritz Angermann
Sent: 26 March 2021 08:00
To: Clinton Mead
Cc: ghc-devs
Subject: Re: Options for targeting Windows XP?
I believe there
I believe there is a bit of misconception about what requires a new backend
or not. GHC is a bunch of different intermediate representations from which
one can take off to build backends. The STG, or Cmm ones are the most
popular. All our Native Code Generators and the LLVM code gen take off from
