On 07/16/03 20:26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann ) wrote:
> - maybe there is a need to have a gimp-specific file format, especially
> when you want to store the image data in a non-trivial way to speed up
> access.
> - maybe there is a need to have a nicely defined exchange format fo
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 16:12:37 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tino Schwarze)
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 12:42:49PM +0200, Marc A. Lehmann wrote:
> > >What happens if in the future someone writes a gimp-java interface
> > >(like gimp-perl)? Would there be any security issues there?
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 10:43:13PM +0200, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> designed as a GIMP-only format. People already use XCF in other apps
> simply because there is no reasonable format for layered images.
That is not true. MIFF was around for years, for example, was always
able to s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2003-07-16 at 2244.11 +0200):
> > Don't! Fullscreen mode is useful for more than that. It is nice when
> > working on a large image, or a smaller image with high magnification, to
> > get rid of superfluous stuff like the window decoration, but in that case
> > the user may sti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2003-07-16 at 2223.29 +0200):
> If we would design our own extremely simple wrapper format there would be
> no need to work with the compatibility mess existing formats are (all of
> them :). If we say that access by other tools than gimp is not important
Brainstorming, a dir na
Hi,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann )> writes:
> If we would design our own extremely simple wrapper format there would be
> no need to work with the compatibility mess existing formats are (all of
> them :). If we say that access by other tools than gimp is not important
> we could get
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 04:28:18PM +0100, "Adam D. Moss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Technically I don't know if that's true. From my ar man page:
>GNU ar can maintain archives whose members have names of
>any length; however, depending on how ar is configured on
>your
On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 18:28, Nathan Carl Summers wrote:
> Don't! Fullscreen mode is useful for more than that. It is nice when
> working on a large image, or a smaller image with high magnification, to
> get rid of superfluous stuff like the window decoration, but in that case
> the user may sti
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 03:39:25PM +0200, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Should I file a request in bugzilla, asking for a "Fullscreen with Menu"
> > option or do you think it would not be worth adding?
>
> I think it is not worth to clutter the menu with this since the menu
> is alwa
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 05:35:42PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> I don't think we should use a compressed archive. Instead the binary
> data in the archive should be compressed. That allows to choose the
> best compression scheme for the data and to combine different
> compression techniques in the
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Nathan Carl Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Fullscreen mode was added to be able to view the image in a neutral
> environment w/o being distracted by any user interface elements.
> Adding a menubar would completely ruin this effort.
I'm s
Hi,
"Adam D. Moss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> HOWEVER, this might be a good time to think about whether we'd
> prefer a compressed format that we can random-access de/compress
> on the fly instead of going via a huge (and with image data we
> can easily be talking HUGE) temporary intermediate
Hi,
Nathan Carl Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This actually could be a serious usablity issue, since a user who has the
> menubar on (which a distro might set as default) after going to fullscreen
> mode might not be able to figure out how to get the menubar back, or even
> how to return
Nathan Carl Summers wrote:
(bah, watching actual real users in usablity tests at work stumble around
when using really fairly simple interfaces has caused me to loose all
faith in the intelligence of humanity. Then again, our users are actual
real users, too.)
Yes, quite so. :( Seeing such studi
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tino Schwarze) writes:
> I think, the security argument against JAR is very far-fetched.
> A JAR is basically a ZIP with a META-INF directory containing a
> MANIFEST.MF file. That's it.
>
> There is a lot of code around for creating / reading ZIP files - I'm a
> bit worried
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann ) wrote:
Well, ar's limitations with respect to name length etc. are in practise
not every severe (nobody will have 1 character file names (the ar
limit), and even antique ar implemnentations will support up to 255
characters).
Technically I don't know if
Hi,
Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Go to the menu and toggle "View Menubar". How did you miss this?
>
> (Gimp 1.3.4) I had the menubar turned on I expected to still have the
> menubar in fullscreen mode.
I don't understand your answer but just to clarify my sentence I will
describe t
> This actually could be a serious usablity issue, since a user who has the
> menubar on (which a distro might set as default) after going to fullscreen
> mode might not be able to figure out how to get the menubar back, or even
> how to return to windowed mode.
Hit Escape (Esc) should work. Als
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Alan Horkan wrote:
>
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Sven Neumann wrote:
>
> > Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 13:57:18 +0200
> > From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Menubar in fullscreen mode [Re: [Gimp-devel
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 12:42:49PM +0200, Marc A. Lehmann wrote:
> > >What happens if in the future someone writes a gimp-java interface
> > >(like gimp-perl)? Would there be any security issues there?
> >
> > No.
>
> "I do not believe people like you."
>
> Sorry, but how can you so
Hi,
Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Should I file a request in bugzilla, asking for a "Fullscreen with Menu"
> option or do you think it would not be worth adding?
I think it is not worth to clutter the menu with this since the menu
is always available as right-click menu anyway. The m
On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 02:34:23PM +0200, Øyvind Kolås <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am currently working on some code related to how GEGL works/is going
Looks cool, however, one note:
>
>
You use id1, ref1 etc... attributes (and you are perfectly fine to use
them), however, XML i
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 11:57:09PM -0400, Leonard Rosenthol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >the ar file format is much better established then jar, quick to access
> >(unlike jar), and very very very much simpler.
>
> Excuse me?!?! JAR is used by every Java implementation in
> existence, an
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 13:57:18 +0200
> From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Menubar in fullscreen mode [Re: [Gimp-developer] the user
> installer]
>
> Hi,
>
> Alan Horkan
On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 10:16:28AM -0400, Leonard Rosenthol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 08:38 AM 7/14/2003 -0400, Robert L Krawitz wrote:
> >What happens if in the future someone writes a gimp-java interface
> >(like gimp-perl)? Would there be any security issues there?
>
> No.
"I do
25 matches
Mail list logo
