Greetings, everyone.
Announcing the second public release of a tarball for the Tiny-Fu plug-in
for the 2.1 version of GIMP. The tarball must currently be hooked in to a
copy of the GIMP 2.1.x source tree by using the supplied gimp.patch patch
file. As of last night (Wednesday, July 14) the new
On Thursday 15 July 2004 07:12 pm, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> Anyone can go and write another
> editor or bug tracker or window manager, if he'd like. That's one of the
> rights that Liberalism gives you. But if someone wishes to embark on
> something like that I'd advise him to contribute to an existin
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Markus Triska wrote:
> Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 18:52:36 +
> From: Markus Triska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Scheme [was Re: [Gimp-developer] OSCon attendance]
>
> On Thursday 15 July 2004 02:25 pm, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> Each of the nominated
On Thursday 15 July 2004 21:52, Markus Triska wrote:
> On Thursday 15 July 2004 02:25 pm, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > Another implementation of Scheme? Aren't the ones in:
> >
> > http://www.schemers.org/Documents/FAQ/#implementations
> >
> > enough? Or isn't any of them better suited as a starting poin
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, David Neary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > On Wednesday 14 July 2004 05:49, Nathan Carl Summers wrote:
> > > Heh, my vote is for Valgrind. :)
> >
> > Well, valgrind is a very nice and useful tool. (I know becuase I'm also using
> > it extensively) However, I think th
On Thursday 15 July 2004 02:25 pm, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> Another implementation of Scheme? Aren't the ones in:
>
> http://www.schemers.org/Documents/FAQ/#implementations
>
> enough? Or isn't any of them better suited as a starting point?
Please ask Tom, not me, because he is doing it, or visit his
On Wednesday 14 July 2004 15:17, Markus Triska wrote:
> > 2. Its main developer (Tom Lord) is desperately in need of cash, as he is
> > currently unemployed. (or at least was the last time I checked).
>
> Visit http://gnuarch.org/ for more information. While he is de facto
> unemployed, as you say,
Hi,
Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The reason I think Arch should win the award instead of the GIMP is
> because of the financial difficulties its main developer is
> facing. I'm not aware of a similar financial difficulty within the
> GIMP core developers. (but would like to be shown
On Thursday 15 July 2004 15:30, David Neary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > On Wednesday 14 July 2004 05:49, Nathan Carl Summers wrote:
> > > Heh, my vote is for Valgrind. :)
> >
> > Well, valgrind is a very nice and useful tool. (I know becuase I'm also
> > using it extensively) However,
Hi,
Shlomi Fish wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 July 2004 05:49, Nathan Carl Summers wrote:
> > Heh, my vote is for Valgrind. :)
>
> Well, valgrind is a very nice and useful tool. (I know becuase I'm also using
> it extensively) However, I think that perhaps GNU Arch deserves to win
> because:
And w
10 matches
Mail list logo
