On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 7:54 AM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have been working on implementing the Save + export spec [1] for a while.
> Since it will affect the workflow for basically everyone it would be nice
> with getting some testing and comments before we finalize, merge and push to
>
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:56 PM, peter sikking wrote:
> OK, first the 5-slot color history:
>
>> So far, no one has given any feedback on the idea, or indeed any
>> acknowledgement of it. This disappoints me
>
>
> Sorry, I had to think about it more before stepping in to this,
> doing that yester
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Rob Antonishen
wrote:
> I just ran through my scripts.
>
> In the .scm files distributed with gimp, there were:
> 38 files containing gimp-context-set-foreground
> 65 files containing gimp-context-set-background
The ones I have looked at, mainly set background an
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 9:13 PM, yahvuu wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> here's a mockup idea on your proposal; might or might not help
> to identify the current<->previous color pair... just brainstorming.
>
> I hope you're not bothered i'm sending private mail - it's just
> i can't contribute anything gen
Hi Jon!
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Jon Senior wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:01:08 +0930
> David Gowers <00a...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> X could work almost unchanged (just, pressing X multiple times in
>> quick succession would move back through the 5-slot color hist
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 12:49 AM, Filipe Soares Dilly wrote:
>
>
> 2009/4/29 peter sikking
>> but some crucial things depend on the bg color.
>> the gradient tool being the big show-stopper for me.
>> the tool needs a redesign, but up to then the fg->bg
>> type of interaction looks to be the most
Hello,
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 5:37 PM, peter sikking wrote:
>> guys,
>>
>> here is sort of a review of what has been discussed here:
>>
>> To take this top-down: I can only see this change as an UI
>> improvement if it means getting
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
> yahvuu wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Alchemie foto\grafiche schrieb:
>>
>>> The possibility to add "CUSTOM " layer modes [..]
>>>
>>
>> that sounds interesting. Just curious: i wonder how custom layer modes
>> differ from filters that take a sec
Hi saulgoode,
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 7:00 PM,
wrote:
> Quoting David Gowers <00a...@gmail.com>:
>
>> The eraser currently does change color values, in the case of layers
>> without alpha (it's like using paintbrush or pencil with the
>> background color). Yahv
Hi saulgoode,
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:29 PM,
wrote:
> Perhaps I am misunderstanding this proposal, but the ramifications
> seem to be more confusing than the present method. And while I realize
> that GIMP does not make any guarantees about retaining the colors of
> transparent pixels, its cur
Hello,
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Krishna Revuru wrote:
> GIMP-Dev-team,
> I was trying to create an animated GIF on a Linux-machine and after quite
> some google-ing I came across the below site
>
> http://nativeraving.blogspot.com/2007/11/creating-animated-gif-files-with-ubuntu.html
> Th
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 4:42 AM, Rob Antonishen
wrote:
> Here is another question... Should the basic paint calls (I.e. Those
> with the description "using current brush") that have no parameters
> just be changed to paint respecting all the current brush options,
> like scaling, jitter, etc. ?
W
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 2:20 AM, yahvuu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> David Gowers schrieb:
>> One bump I see is things like "Cut" and "Float" -- quite often I want
>> them to fill the source area with a solid color rather than with
>> transparency. When
Hello yahvuu,
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 9:31 PM, yahvuu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> peter sikking schrieb:
>> I like the innovative nature of the idea.
>
> it would not be without a hint of irony if, after 40+ years of digital image
> processing,
> GIMP were the first to finally introduce the concept of
Hi Theodore,
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Theodore Imre wrote:
> gimp is not a good choise for digital painting because it doesnt have a
> blending tool. Paint tool sai in the respect is far superior because its
> brush engine is much more advanced for smooth blending
Please keep your replies
Hi LIMN,
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 7:07 PM, LightningIsMyName
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Gimp 2.6 allows to use brush dynamics to control opacity, size, hard and
> color.
> These features greatly increase the drawing capabilities of gimp, and many
> users find them very useful.
> However, we don't have a
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 12:05 AM, Alchemie foto\grafiche
wrote:
>
> I found the algorithms of many merging mode
>
> BUT all the the formula there do not take opacity into account so as now the
> blending may be done only at 100% opacity
> (btw is for a "blending filter" , that allow to merge als
Hi,
I was aware that migration of GNOME project version management to GIT
was underway; however, I just noticed that the GIT version (@
git.gnome.org/cgit/gimp) was more up-to-date, having '*
app/paint/gimppaintcore.[ch]: made GimpCoords* parameter of
GimpPaintCore::start() const.' by Mitc
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 8:07 PM, SHIRAKAWA Akira
wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:21:59 +0200, Eduardo Barijan
> wrote:
>
>> I was thinking this time about 3 new other features that Gimp could have:
>>
>> 1 - grouping layers by folder.
>>
>> This one should help artists who does their work in
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 5:11 AM, Mirai Warren
wrote:
> Ach. Sorry, but my meaning was simply that an artist can create art
> with any tool. mspaint was only an example.
>
>>Looks like you have to make a tough choice to stop contradicting yourself :)
> I wasn't contradicting myself. By "was resp
Hello Andrea,
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Andrea Olivotto
wrote:
> David Gowers wrote:
>>
>>
>> I hope I've addressed your concerns.
>>
>> David
>
> Thanks a lot for your fast reply and your answers!
>
> I'm happy to hear t
Hello Andrea!
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:57 AM, Andrea Olivotto
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm a photo amateur, and I do like gimp. I posted some time ago some
> hints to make gimp more useful for photo retouch, and some have been
> done in 2.6.
>
> At this time, gimp seems to me that need speed. It is f
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Nathael Pajani wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> The number of lines of code has nothing to do with what is important.
> Gnome is a UI
> Window managers are UI
> GIMP is an Image Manipulation Program
> The User interface is here to allow access to it's capabilities as an image
Hi Hadrien,
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 5:48 AM, Hadrien G. wrote:
> => I'm currently using Microsoft Windows XP as my main OS. Would it help
> greatly to get some Linux distro back on my hard drive ?
Yes, development is much easier on Linux.
> => How does one design the gimp UI ? Are there graphica
Hi Hadrian!
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Hadrien G. wrote:
> Hi !
>
> Playing with gimp lately, I've been thinking that it would be nice to be
> able to save the toolbox state (and maybe other things related to
> dockable window placement) in profiles.
>
> As an example, when I make photo edi
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Nathael Pajani wrote:
> David Gowers a écrit :
>>
>> Hello Nathael,
>
> Hi !
> Nice to have a constructive answer from time to time :)
>
>> Removing customizability is best. I'm not kidding. Customizability is
>> what h
Hello Nathael,
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Nathael Pajani wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> > It appears that your only problem is that things are changing. Sorry, but
> you
> > will have to get along with that. We are not going to stop ourselves from
> > changing the GIMP user interface to the bette
> gradation map - nearly the same: map image points to positions in the
> gradient
Yahvuu, you probably need to clarify: how is this different from
Colors->Map->Gradient Map?
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 4:12 AM, yahvuu wrote:
>
>> leve
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Rob Antonishen
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:15 PM, David Gowers wrote:
>> Hello Rob,
>>> It seems you can no longer paste into a channel.
>> In the latest SVN, you can.
>> It is confusing that the floating layer shows up in th
Hello Rob,
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Rob Antonishen
wrote:
>
>
> I dug up a copy of this manula, and discovered a couple things after
> playing with channels in 2.6.4 and 2.6.1 on Ubuntu.
>
> In the instructions, it states:
> Open the Channels tab and create a new channel. In the New Chan
Hello,
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do we need the full complexity of the current image hoses for this?
> Looks like a simple linear series of brushes could be sufficient.
No and no respectively, IMO.
Don't need full image-hose functionality for this; however IM
Hello,
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 9:52 PM, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 15:50 +1030, David Gowers wrote:
>
>> I think we would have to. At least, in my vision, where we want
>> GIH/GBR to be eventually deprecated in preference of SVG. This would
&g
Hello,
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 22:22 +0530, sumith pandilwar wrote:
>> by adding support for svg files i would like to add the feature to
>> import svg file and modify its properties like colour, fade out etc
>> and use it like a brush
Hello,
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 10:09 AM, gg wrote:
> there is a problem with this new attitude. Why does GIMP try to impose
> this " you will work with xcf or die" dictate?
Because it has always been an XCF editor, not an anything else editor.
Being able to modify images loaded from PNG, JPEG etc
Hello!
I have just been trying to get into Bugzilla, to mention this in the
'rotate brushes' bug, but Bugzilla is currently hanging for all
operations.
Anyway, suppose you have a brush of radius 16, and you set brush scale
to 0.25 and begin smudging. The smudge is performed with the original
sized
Hi!!!
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Rob Antonishen
wrote:
> I posted this as a bug, and was told by Sven Neumann the behaviour was
> intentional and to raise it here.
>
> Currently, when saving a selection to a channel, either using the UI
> or via the PDB, the active drawable gets changed fro
Hi!
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Tal wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm very close to finishing code for efficient bilinear interpolation of
> transformed brushes (Bug 520078 – Rotate brushes
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=520078).
>
> I will post again soon when the code is ready.
Excell
I had just pasted a piece of image (copied from a layer without alpha,
pasted back on to a layer without alpha) and, as I clicked to anchor
it, GIMP crashed with this message:
ERROR:gegl-node.c:1929:gegl_node_remove_child: assertion failed:
(child_priv->parent == self || child_priv->parent == NULL
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am aware that it is a work in progress --
> just to let you know (Alexia and others) - the changes in the two commits
> dated 10-feb-2009 got things a lot worse and less natural for me than it was
> before.
>
> I am nto complain
Hi!!
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Guillermo Espertino
wrote:
> Hi.
> I don't know if this can be considered as a bug, but I'd like to discuss
> some potential issues in the color profile embedding strategy.
> Currently (correct me if I'm wrong) the procedure for images without
> embedded profi
Hi!
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 7:42 AM, jEsuSdA 8) wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> Ramón Miranda has published his nice Gimp Paint Studio for Gimp.
>
> GPS is a set of brushes, presets and color palettes specifically made for
> digital painters.
>
> You could see information and download the GPS and the GPS M
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Hal V. Engel wrote:
> On Sunday 25 January 2009 21:53:54 Martin Nordholts wrote:
> Just curious. Since GEGL has support for more high bit depth formats than
> just 16 bit int/channel how much more work would be needed to support a wider
For proper 16bit suppo
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 11:47 PM, David Gowers <00a...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 2:48 PM, jungle wrote:
>>
>> Has anyone ever done any work implementing advanced interpolation schemes
>> (NEDI or ICBI)? They provide much better results than the spa
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 2:48 PM, jungle wrote:
>
> Has anyone ever done any work implementing advanced interpolation schemes
> (NEDI or ICBI)? They provide much better results than the spatially
> invariant schemes present in GIMP.
AFAIK no.
>
> I would probably be able to code up something, but
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Jonas Nicolaisen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am a level designer creating Quake levels. This means I often have to
> work with textures. At the moment, I have to rely on obscure '90s
> software running via wine, which is suboptimal. There are more people
> like me.
>
> Qua
As I was working on i18n, I noticed the following string bug in
app/tools/gimpforegroundselecttool.c:
status = _("Rougly outline the object to extract");
So, here's a tiny patch that fixes it (attached).
David.
Index: app/tools/gimpforegroundselecttool.c
=
Hello,
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Alchemie fotografiche
wrote:
> I believe there are some "artificial" limitation to the potential of script
> fu, derived by the exigence to "categorize " the scripts in 2 main categories:
> "Previous toolbox-scripts" that create a new imagine
> "imagine s
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 12:10 AM, Alpár Jüttner wrote:
>
>> GIMP is GPL and has always been. If you don't like the GPL license, for
>> whatever reason, then you should not contribute to this project.
>
> Interesting. I knew that GIMP developers must accept GPL as the license
> of GIMP, but it is n
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Cristian Secară wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 08:15:23 +0100, Martin Nordholts wrote:
>
>> > > Is this implemented ?
>> > yes, it is not hidden and it is implemented.
>> > the option associated with that is 'transient docks' (in the
>> > 'interface section of the pre
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 4:23 AM, Cristian Secară wrote:
> During the translation process I came across this tooltip:
> ===
> When enabled, dock windows (the toolbox and palettes) are set to be
> transient to the active image window. Most window managers will keep
> the dock windows above the image
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Chris Mohler wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Sven Neumann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sun, 2008-12-28 at 19:25 +, Chris Mohler wrote:
>>
>>> With a recent SVN I created a new image, added guides, and saved it as
>>> a template. However when I create
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 2008-12-28 at 19:25 +, Chris Mohler wrote:
>
>> With a recent SVN I created a new image, added guides, and saved it as
>> a template. However when I create a new image and select the
>> template, the guides are no lon
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 10:39 PM, Pablo Yaggi wrote:
>> Script-fu has no special status, it's just an extension to gimp
>
>> In fact, Gimp-Python has been the standard recommended language interface
>
>> for quite a while now.
>
> Will it be deprecated some time soon ?
No, Script-Fu will not be de
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Pablo Yaggi wrote:
> So, there will be no case of somebody passing the
>
> RUN-(NON)INTERACTIVE parameter to my script, will be ?
>
> If that is the case, why the pdb browser is showing as the
>
> first parameter to my scrypt the run-mode, isn't it confusing ?
>
>
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 6:15 AM, Pablo Yaggi wrote:
> Now I have my script running, It's a simple script that produces the
>
> table-mirror effect apple does, but is it possible to check whether
>
> the interface is available or not, I mean if gimp is running with -i mode
>
> (no interface).
Hi Lionel,
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 8:15 PM, Lionel Tarazón <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi David
>
>>
>> > I am currently developing a Gimp plug-in with a GTK+ user interface.
>> > My plug-in is unstable if the user modifies the image or calls other
>> > plug-ins while it is running.
>> What versi
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 6:35 AM, David Gowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 2:34 AM, Daniel Hornung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thursday 20 November 2008, David Gowers wrote:
>>>
>>> This is usually effectively th
Hello Lionel,
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 3:04 AM, Lionel Tarazón <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am currently developing a Gimp plug-in with a GTK+ user interface.
> My plug-in is unstable if the user modifies the image or calls other
> plug-ins while it is running.
What version of GI
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 2:34 AM, Daniel Hornung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 20 November 2008, David Gowers wrote:
>>
>> This is usually effectively the same as pasting (ctrl+V for most
>> people, Insert for me). Is creating a floating selection
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 6:41 AM, Daniel Hornung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in case it's not too late (meaning "a brand-new floating selection replacement
> is to be implemented soon"), I have a small proposal to make the current
> behaviour a bit more user-friendly:
>
> While working
Hello,
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 12:50 PM, David Gowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Lastly! I don't know whether this merges shadow-tiles in linear-light
> RGB or not. It appears that it does, but I haven't run proper tests
> ye
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 9:18 AM, David Gowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll see what happens when I make that change :)
> (apparently just one line, app/core/gimpprojection.c:391, is needed to
> be changed to implement this now :D)
This was slightly more complex t
Hello Martin,
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 8:18 AM, Martin Nordholts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi David
>
> David Gowers wrote:
>> Ah, so if I want to make the result preserve the alpha of the
>> underlying layer, I'll need to do that via layer mask?
>>
&g
Hello Martin,
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 4:36 AM, Martin Nordholts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2. With a 100% opaque Addition mode layer put on top a completely
> transparent layer, the resulting composite becomes 100% opaque
> containing the unblended Addition mode layer pixels when using GEGL, but
Hi Joao
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 12:15 PM, Joao S. O. Bueno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David,
> as far as filters are concerned, I'd strongly, and that means __strongly__,
> suggest you to use keyboard shrotcuts to get to your filters.
This is definitely important. I'm working on it. It takes time
Hi vabijou,
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 2:21 AM, vabijou2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> peter sikking wrote:
>>
>>
>> the only thing I would change is to swap the order of Grain merge and
>> Grain extract. simply because it is explained as a workflow in that
>> order in the manual.
>>
>>
>
> I would
Hi Viktor,
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 7:43 AM, Viktor Kojouharov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This has been discussed somewhat in the very distant past. The last
A lot, actually:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51937
> discussion ended with the verdict that recording user actions (and
> pla
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 6:46 PM, Martin Nordholts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Gowers wrote:
>> I'm assuming that the separate layer modes will eventually separate
>> into their own files for reasons of speed, in which case this is
I meant separate operat
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 9:34 AM, Martin Nordholts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I understand what you mean now. We are not doing the same kind of paring
> though. You are pairing layer modes that are cancelling each other out
> while I am paring layer modes that give opposite effects on lightness
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 8:22 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 12:36 AM, David Gowers wrote:
>
>>> It would be quite useful to be able using same snapping options (snapping to
>>> guides, grid, canvas border, active pat
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 12:02 AM, Martin Nordholts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Gowers wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 11:06 PM, Martin Nordholts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Actually, I didn't understand why you grouped them
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 4:59 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As requested to discuss it on list rather than on bgo...
>
> It would be quite useful to be able using same snapping options (snapping to
> guides, grid, canvas border, active path) across sessions, prefe
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 11:06 PM, Martin Nordholts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> peter sikking wrote:
>> Martin wrote:
>>> The darker and lighter modes have been internally sorted based on how
>>> much they tend to affect the image, see end of mail.
>>>
>>
>> is it then a coincidence you got imp
Hi Adam,
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 9:51 PM, Adam C Powell IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I am working on an image processing plug-in (which I'll offer for
> upstream contribution BSD-licensed), and would really like to have a
> couple of primitives that I can't find.
>
> One is findi
Hi Liam,
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Liam R E Quin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 01:44 +0100, Joern P. Meier wrote:
> [...]
>> By the way, what kind of downscaling is used for the view zooming?
>
> GEGL is doing that.
GEGL is not doing that. GEGL certainly has display-py
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:37 PM, Claus Berghammer (Bugzilla)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello Gimp Developers,
>
> Sven Neumann asked me to move this thread from the Users mailinglist, to
> developers. The original discussion can be found here:
> http://www.nabble.com/Scaling-in-Gimp-2.6
I just tried this out (again).
Is it possible for the text tool to only grab printable characters?
For example, I use the 'my calculator' key to repeat the last filter,
and I've remapped NumLock to XF86Save and use it for saving the image.
Neither of these produce a printable character, but the te
With a recent SVN build of GIMP, I noticed that after entering a new
size in the 'Resize Canvas' dialog, the dialog would not show the new
size, and became unresponsive until I moved the window -- then it
would show the new size and respond to input.
To be exact, I did this:
1. Bring up the 'resi
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Jim Michaels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please send only plain-text mail to this list. HTML mail annoys people here.
> Akima spline curves give drawing freedom, at least some kind of
> interpolating spline curve where you can just simply lay the points down a
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Chris Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 12:24 AM, Chris Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> I've been mucking around with a GIMP plugin a la python, and I have a
>> question:
>>
>> Is there a method to discover the GIM
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 5:17 AM, Kent Tenney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I wish the gimp-curves-tool.settings file, which contains sections
> starting with:
>
> (GimpCurvesConfig "2008-10-03 14:34:26"
>(time 1223062466)
>(channel value)
>(curve
>...
>
> also listed
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 1:20 AM, Kent Tenney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 7:01 PM,
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Quoting Kent Tenney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>> will there be provisions to apply a saved curve to an image without the
>>> gui?
>>>
>>
>> If you have the GIMP An
Hi Kent,
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 8:47 PM, Kent Tenney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 7:01 PM,
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Quoting Kent Tenney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>> will there be provisions to apply a saved curve to an image without the
>>> gui?
>>>
>>
>> If you have t
Hi Samuel,
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Samuel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been at the GIMP IRC channel and they told me that C is faster than
> Python if I want many pixel ops. I wrote a test plugin in Python which copies
> a layer pixel per pixel to another one and it needs several
Hi Guillermo,
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Guillermo Espertino
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm testing Gimp 2.5.4 and it's amazing.
> I know it's late for a feature request, but I think it's worth to
> discuss about the current behavior of the new feature present in the
> transform tools: th
Hi Paul.
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 8:56 AM, paul taney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why does he multiply the image by 256 and elsewhere divide image/256?
He's expecting an image with values ranging 0..1. If the values you
are providing are 0..255, you'll need to remove both of those.
>
>>
>> Which a
Hi Paul,
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 2:19 AM, paul taney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>
>> When it doesn't register, is there any console output
>> from GIMP?
>>
>> Chris
>
>
> I"ve got things working now and use numpy to convert bluelines to SVG lines
> or a python tuple that gets written out.
>
Hi Maciej,
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Maciej Pilichowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> From: bgw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> How does "draw with transparency" differ from using eraser tool
>> with x% opacity?
>
> Pencil and eraser are counterparts of course, but I wished for
> transpar
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 11:21 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Choi, JiHui wrote:
>> Hi, Sven
>>
>> Now I know. But in some environments, it's not convenient.
>> If your system supports cleartype fonts, it may be good, but if not
>> and you use
Hello,
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 4:12 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just pulled a clean svn gimp and wanted to build with
> --prefix=/usr/local , I supplied this arguement to autogen.sh and it
> output both that prefix and --prefix=/opt/gimp , which I presume is the
> new default.
...
Hello Nicolas,
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Nicolas Robidoux
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> http://web.cs.laurentian.ca/robidoux/misc/
>
> contains an add-on (the gzipped tar gimptests.tgz) to the "kingfisher" test
>
> http://svenfoo.org/scaletest/133-9.html
>
> and the "shefoxes" test
>
> ht
Hello,
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 5:27 AM, Daniel Eddeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Google Summer of Code Project: Improve the text-tool in GIMP
>
> By Daniel Eddeland (Skalle)
>
> In Gimp 2.4 and earlier versions, the text tool uses an external
> editor window, which is inconvenient in several w
Hi Aurimas, I've tried this out and read your PDF, this is what I think:
The basic idea is good and neatly implemented. It needs more
consistency upon integration with SVN HEAD.
For example
* 'Next Brush' / 'Previous Brush' actions don't move through the
filtered view, they move through the entir
Hello,
On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 2:38 AM, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 19:55 +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
>
>> This is probably because there is bug in your version of intltools or
>> that version is too old.
>>
>> For instance, the version from Ubuntu
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 7:30 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 22:20:00 +0200, Nicolas Robidoux
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> A student of mine and I have put together a gimp plug-in which ENLARGES
>> images using a method which is analogous to global cubic splines, that
The attached patch allows you to open several images, assign keyboard
shortcuts to them, and these shortcuts will persist, so that if you
assigned '1','2','3' to the first, second, and third image, you could
continue to switch between the first, second, and third opened image
with 1, 2, and 3.
Beca
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 5:06 AM, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 23:25 +0930, David Gowers wrote:
>
>> One or two messages (the english part) refer to 'Colorsize' where they
>> should refer to 'Colorize
Hello,
I just noticed a usability issue with the 'Windows' actions related to
image displays in SVN... They seem to be attached to specific
displays, rather than to the Nth display out of the current displays.
Currently, we can switch quickly between some active images by using
dynamic keyboard s
Hello,
As I was working on Esperanto translation for gimp, I noticed that it
(eo.po).. and the following .po files (in /po/ directory),
have a strange problem with a message.
pl
fr
ru
ja
lt
oc
One or two messages (the english part) refer to 'Colorsize' where they
should refer to 'Colorize'
(as
Hi solar,
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 6:58 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:53:36 +0200, David Gowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I've finished checking, and am just sending off the results and
>> webpage to Sven now.
>> David
&g
101 - 200 of 428 matches
Mail list logo