On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 04:51:43PM +, Nick Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nobody understands the dependencies anymore.
I think that's the end of any useful technical discussion. I will look
Nick, we would have a lot less rpoblems if you just tried to communicate
instead of bumping a
Hi Nathan,
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Nathan C Summers wrote:
Having plug-ins available to run on other hosts would be nice. Think
a gimp farm. CORBA would seem to be an ideal solution to all of these
issues. Can CORBA handle the large amounts of data transfer gimp
requires at least as
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 04:53:14PM -0500, Michael Meeks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know what the gimp protocol is - clearly for _massive_
chunks of data, shared memory is the only way to go. Vladimir has a nice
CORBA interface for dealing with setting up shmem chunks to do
Marc Lehmann wrote:
I'd like to remind people that corba is not the only way to go, as there
is also dco and especially MCOP (which was designed for realtime and
multimedia applications). While CORBA might indeed be the best choice, it
mustn't be choosen just because it has more letters ;-
